Two Handheld Retinograph Devices Evaluated by Ophthalmologists and an Artificial Intelligence Algorithm.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Pedro Romero-Aroca, Benilde Fontoba-Poveda, Eugeni Garcia-Curto, Aida Valls, Julián Cristiano, Monica Llagostera-Serra, Cristian Morente-Lorenzo, Isabel Mendez-Marín, Marc Baget-Bernaldiz
{"title":"Two Handheld Retinograph Devices Evaluated by Ophthalmologists and an Artificial Intelligence Algorithm.","authors":"Pedro Romero-Aroca, Benilde Fontoba-Poveda, Eugeni Garcia-Curto, Aida Valls, Julián Cristiano, Monica Llagostera-Serra, Cristian Morente-Lorenzo, Isabel Mendez-Marín, Marc Baget-Bernaldiz","doi":"10.3390/jcm13226935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background/Objectives:</b> Telemedicine in diabetic retinopathy (RD) screening is effective but does not reach the entire diabetes population. The use of portable cameras and artificial intelligence (AI) can help in screening diabetes. <b>Methods:</b> We evaluated the ability of two handheld cameras, one based on a smartphone and the other on a smartscope, to obtain images for comparison with OCT. Evaluation was carried out in two stages: the first by two retina specialists and the second using an artificial intelligence algorithm that we developed. <b>Results:</b> The retina specialists reported that the smartphone images required mydriasis in all cases, compared to 73.05% of the smartscope images and 71.11% of the OCT images. Images were ungradable in 27.98% of the retinographs with the smartphone and in 7.98% with the smartscope. The detection of any DR using the AI algorithm showed that the smartphone obtained lower recall values (0.89) and F1 scores (0.89) than the smartscope, with 0.99. Low results were also obtained using the smartphone to detect mild DR (146 retinographs), compared to using the smartscope (218 retinographs). <b>Conclusions:</b> we consider that the use of handheld devices together with AI algorithms for reading retinographs can be useful for DR screening, although the ease of image acquisition through small pupils with these devices needs to be improved.</p>","PeriodicalId":15533,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","volume":"13 22","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13226935","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Telemedicine in diabetic retinopathy (RD) screening is effective but does not reach the entire diabetes population. The use of portable cameras and artificial intelligence (AI) can help in screening diabetes. Methods: We evaluated the ability of two handheld cameras, one based on a smartphone and the other on a smartscope, to obtain images for comparison with OCT. Evaluation was carried out in two stages: the first by two retina specialists and the second using an artificial intelligence algorithm that we developed. Results: The retina specialists reported that the smartphone images required mydriasis in all cases, compared to 73.05% of the smartscope images and 71.11% of the OCT images. Images were ungradable in 27.98% of the retinographs with the smartphone and in 7.98% with the smartscope. The detection of any DR using the AI algorithm showed that the smartphone obtained lower recall values (0.89) and F1 scores (0.89) than the smartscope, with 0.99. Low results were also obtained using the smartphone to detect mild DR (146 retinographs), compared to using the smartscope (218 retinographs). Conclusions: we consider that the use of handheld devices together with AI algorithms for reading retinographs can be useful for DR screening, although the ease of image acquisition through small pupils with these devices needs to be improved.

由眼科医生和人工智能算法对两款手持式视网膜造影仪进行评估。
背景/目标:远程医疗在糖尿病视网膜病变(RD)筛查中很有效,但并不能覆盖所有糖尿病患者。使用便携式摄像头和人工智能(AI)有助于糖尿病筛查。方法:我们评估了两款手持相机(一款基于智能手机,另一款基于智能眼镜)获取图像与 OCT 进行对比的能力。评估分两个阶段进行:第一阶段由两位视网膜专家进行,第二阶段使用我们开发的人工智能算法。结果:视网膜专家报告说,智能手机图像在所有情况下都需要散瞳,而智能视网膜镜图像和 OCT 图像的散瞳率分别为 73.05% 和 71.11%。27.98%的智能手机视网膜图像无法分级,7.98%的智能视网膜图像无法分级。使用人工智能算法检测任何 DR 显示,智能手机的召回值(0.89)和 F1 分数(0.89)均低于智能视网膜镜的 0.99。使用智能手机检测轻度 DR(146 张视网膜图像)的结果也低于使用智能显微镜(218 张视网膜图像)的结果。结论:我们认为,使用手持设备和人工智能算法读取视网膜图像可用于 DR 筛查,但使用这些设备通过小瞳孔获取图像的便利性有待提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Journal of Clinical Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
6468
审稿时长
16.32 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383), is an international scientific open access journal, providing a platform for advances in health care/clinical practices, the study of direct observation of patients and general medical research. This multi-disciplinary journal is aimed at a wide audience of medical researchers and healthcare professionals. Unique features of this journal: manuscripts regarding original research and ideas will be particularly welcomed.JCM also accepts reviews, communications, and short notes. There is no limit to publication length: our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信