Evaluation of Different Mode of Action Insecticides for the Control of Bemisia tabaci; Enhancement of Pesticide Efficacy.

IF 2.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 ENTOMOLOGY
Insects Pub Date : 2024-11-20 DOI:10.3390/insects15110907
Jackie Dunn, Debbie Ann Collins, Neil Audsley
{"title":"Evaluation of Different Mode of Action Insecticides for the Control of <i>Bemisia tabaci</i>; Enhancement of Pesticide Efficacy.","authors":"Jackie Dunn, Debbie Ann Collins, Neil Audsley","doi":"10.3390/insects15110907","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Bemisia tabaci</i> (Gennadius) is a major pest worldwide, causing damage to a vast range of plants through its feeding on phloem sap and its vectoring of >100 plant viruses. Although not established in the UK, it is regularly introduced on planting material, which poses a significant plant health risk. Restrictions on pesticide use and increasing resistance to available active ingredients limit options for effective control of potential outbreaks. Alternative management options are required to mitigate this risk. There was high variability in the efficacy of the different modes of action products tested against two life stages (adults and larvae) as well as the Middle East-Asia Minor 1 (MEAM1) and Mediterranean (MED) cryptic species of <i>B. tabaci</i>. For both adults and larvae, MEAM1 were more susceptible than MED insects, possibly due to differences in resistance developed against some active ingredients. All products tested were effective to varying degrees against MEAM1 adults with Tracer (spinosad), PREV-AM (orange oil), Sequoia (sulfoxaflor), and FLiPPER (fatty acids) having similar efficacies (59-78% mortality). In contrast, PREV-AM and FLiPPER were most effective against MED adults (74% and 65% mortalities, respectively). Both MED and MEAM1 larvae were highly susceptible to FLiPPER and PREV-AM (>95% mortality), and the efficacy of Tracer and FLiPPER can be enhanced by using in combination with PREV-AM, and this can be achieved by using low doses of each product. Synergy was measured between PREV-AM and Tracer against MEAM1 larvae, which has the potential to provide effective control with a reduced pesticide application.</p>","PeriodicalId":13642,"journal":{"name":"Insects","volume":"15 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11594740/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Insects","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/insects15110907","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) is a major pest worldwide, causing damage to a vast range of plants through its feeding on phloem sap and its vectoring of >100 plant viruses. Although not established in the UK, it is regularly introduced on planting material, which poses a significant plant health risk. Restrictions on pesticide use and increasing resistance to available active ingredients limit options for effective control of potential outbreaks. Alternative management options are required to mitigate this risk. There was high variability in the efficacy of the different modes of action products tested against two life stages (adults and larvae) as well as the Middle East-Asia Minor 1 (MEAM1) and Mediterranean (MED) cryptic species of B. tabaci. For both adults and larvae, MEAM1 were more susceptible than MED insects, possibly due to differences in resistance developed against some active ingredients. All products tested were effective to varying degrees against MEAM1 adults with Tracer (spinosad), PREV-AM (orange oil), Sequoia (sulfoxaflor), and FLiPPER (fatty acids) having similar efficacies (59-78% mortality). In contrast, PREV-AM and FLiPPER were most effective against MED adults (74% and 65% mortalities, respectively). Both MED and MEAM1 larvae were highly susceptible to FLiPPER and PREV-AM (>95% mortality), and the efficacy of Tracer and FLiPPER can be enhanced by using in combination with PREV-AM, and this can be achieved by using low doses of each product. Synergy was measured between PREV-AM and Tracer against MEAM1 larvae, which has the potential to provide effective control with a reduced pesticide application.

评估不同作用模式的杀虫剂对 Bemisia tabaci 的防治效果;提高杀虫剂的药效。
烟粉虱(Bemisia tabaci,Gennadius)是世界上的一种主要害虫,通过吸食韧皮部汁液和传播超过 100 种植物病毒,对大量植物造成损害。虽然它没有在英国定居,但经常被引入种植材料中,对植物健康构成重大威胁。对杀虫剂使用的限制以及现有活性成分抗药性的增加限制了有效控制潜在疫情的选择。需要采用其他管理方案来降低这一风险。针对两种生命阶段(成虫和幼虫)以及中东-小亚细亚 1 号(MEAM1)和地中海(MED)隐种烟草虱,所测试的不同作用模式产品的药效差异很大。就成虫和幼虫而言,MEAM1 比 MED 昆虫更易感,这可能是由于对某些活性成分产生的抗药性不同所致。测试的所有产品对 MEAM1 成虫都有不同程度的效果,其中 Tracer(旋喷磷)、PREV-AM(桔子油)、Sequoia(磺胺草酮)和 FLiPPER(脂肪酸)的效果相似(死亡率为 59-78%)。相比之下,PREV-AM 和 FLiPPER 对 MED 成虫最有效(死亡率分别为 74% 和 65%)。MED和MEAM1幼虫对FLiPPER和PREV-AM的敏感性都很高(死亡率>95%),Tracer和FLiPPER与PREV-AM联用可提高药效,而且每种产品的剂量都很低。据测定,PREV-AM 和 Tracer 对 MEAM1 幼虫具有协同增效作用,有可能在减少杀虫剂用量的情况下实现有效防治。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Insects
Insects Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Insect Science
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
1013
审稿时长
21.77 days
期刊介绍: Insects (ISSN 2075-4450) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal of entomology published by MDPI online quarterly. It publishes reviews, research papers and communications related to the biology, physiology and the behavior of insects and arthropods. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Electronic files regarding the full details of the experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信