Three-Dimensional Characterization of Potatoes Under Different Drying Methods: Quality Optimization for Hybrid Drying Approach.

IF 4.7 2区 农林科学 Q1 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Foods Pub Date : 2024-11-14 DOI:10.3390/foods13223633
Yinka Sikiru, Jitendra Paliwal, Chyngyz Erkinbaev
{"title":"Three-Dimensional Characterization of Potatoes Under Different Drying Methods: Quality Optimization for Hybrid Drying Approach.","authors":"Yinka Sikiru, Jitendra Paliwal, Chyngyz Erkinbaev","doi":"10.3390/foods13223633","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The quality evaluation of processed potatoes is vital in the food industry. In this study, the effect of three different drying methods on the post-processing quality of potatoes utilizing 4, 8, 12, and 16 h of freeze drying (FD), infrared drying (ID), and oven drying (OD) was investigated. The impact of the drying methods on the potato's microstructure was analyzed and quantified using 3D X-ray micro-computed tomography images. A new Hybrid Quality Score Evaluator (HQSE) was introduced and used to assess the Quality Index (QI) and Specific Energy Consumption Index (SECI) across various drying methods and durations. Mathematical models were developed to predict the optimal drying method. FD showed significantly higher (<i>p</i> < 0.05) colour retention, rehydration ratio, and total porosity, with minimal shrinkage, although it had higher energy consumption. ID had the shortest drying time, followed by OD and FD. The optimization showed that for FD, the optimal time of 5.78 h increased QI by 9.7% and SECI by 30.6%. The mathematical models could accurately predict the QI and SECI under different drying methods, balancing quality preservation with energy efficiency. The findings suggest that a hybrid drying system could optimize potato quality and energy consumption.</p>","PeriodicalId":12386,"journal":{"name":"Foods","volume":"13 22","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foods","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/foods13223633","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The quality evaluation of processed potatoes is vital in the food industry. In this study, the effect of three different drying methods on the post-processing quality of potatoes utilizing 4, 8, 12, and 16 h of freeze drying (FD), infrared drying (ID), and oven drying (OD) was investigated. The impact of the drying methods on the potato's microstructure was analyzed and quantified using 3D X-ray micro-computed tomography images. A new Hybrid Quality Score Evaluator (HQSE) was introduced and used to assess the Quality Index (QI) and Specific Energy Consumption Index (SECI) across various drying methods and durations. Mathematical models were developed to predict the optimal drying method. FD showed significantly higher (p < 0.05) colour retention, rehydration ratio, and total porosity, with minimal shrinkage, although it had higher energy consumption. ID had the shortest drying time, followed by OD and FD. The optimization showed that for FD, the optimal time of 5.78 h increased QI by 9.7% and SECI by 30.6%. The mathematical models could accurately predict the QI and SECI under different drying methods, balancing quality preservation with energy efficiency. The findings suggest that a hybrid drying system could optimize potato quality and energy consumption.

不同干燥方法下马铃薯的三维特征:混合干燥法的质量优化。
加工马铃薯的质量评估在食品工业中至关重要。本研究调查了冷冻干燥(FD)、红外干燥(ID)和烘箱干燥(OD)4、8、12 和 16 小时三种不同干燥方法对马铃薯加工后质量的影响。使用三维 X 射线显微计算机断层扫描图像分析和量化了干燥方法对马铃薯微观结构的影响。引入了一种新的混合质量评分评估器(HQSE),用于评估不同干燥方法和持续时间下的质量指数(QI)和特定能耗指数(SECI)。建立了数学模型来预测最佳干燥方法。尽管能耗较高,但 FD 的保色率、复水率和总孔隙率明显更高(p < 0.05),收缩率也最小。ID 的干燥时间最短,其次是 OD 和 FD。优化结果表明,FD 的最佳时间为 5.78 小时,QI 提高了 9.7%,SECI 提高了 30.6%。数学模型可以准确预测不同干燥方法下的 QI 和 SECI,同时兼顾质量保证和能源效率。研究结果表明,混合干燥系统可以优化马铃薯的质量和能耗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Foods
Foods Immunology and Microbiology-Microbiology
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
15.40%
发文量
3516
审稿时长
15.83 days
期刊介绍: Foods (ISSN 2304-8158) is an international, peer-reviewed scientific open access journal which provides an advanced forum for studies related to all aspects of food research. It publishes reviews, regular research papers and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists, researchers, and other food professionals to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible or share their knowledge with as much readers unlimitedly as possible. There is no restriction on the length of the papers. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. There are, in addition, unique features of this journal: Ÿ manuscripts regarding research proposals and research ideas will be particularly welcomed Ÿ electronic files or software regarding the full details of the calculation and experimental procedure, if unable to be published in a normal way, can be deposited as supplementary material Ÿ we also accept manuscripts communicating to a broader audience with regard to research projects financed with public funds
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信