3D morphometric analysis of the epiglottis using CBCT: age and gender differences.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Ceren Özeren Keşkek, Emre Aytuğar
{"title":"3D morphometric analysis of the epiglottis using CBCT: age and gender differences.","authors":"Ceren Özeren Keşkek, Emre Aytuğar","doi":"10.1186/s12880-024-01506-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to perform a comprehensive morphometric analysis of the epiglottis using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images, including the determination of epiglottis dimensions, the investigation of shape variations, and the assessment of their relationship with gender and age.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective analysis was conducted on high-quality CBCT images from 100 patients, obtained using the NewTom 5G system. In CBCT images, epiglottis thicknesses (right, midline, left) and horizontal angle at three levels (suprahyoid, hyoid, infrahyoid) were measured in axial sections, while the length and vertical angle of epiglottis were measured in midsagittal view. Epiglottis shapes were identified through 3D visualization.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The midline epiglottis thicknesses were 4.68 mm at the suprahyoid level, 5.51 mm at the hyoid level, and 6.80 mm at the infrahyoid levels. Epiglottis thicknesses and length were statistically significantly greater in males. Of the 100 patients, 51 had a normal curvature, 41 had a flat epiglottis, and 8 had an omega epiglottis. The omega-shaped epiglottis was significantly longer compared to both the flat and normal curvature types (p = 0.011). There was a positive correlation between age and epiglottis thicknesses at the suprahyoid level and horizontal angles at three levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study visualizes epiglottis morphology and uncovers significant morphometric differences. Males exhibit greater epiglottis thickness and length compared to females, while the omega-shaped epiglottis is notably longer than other types. These findings underscore the need for further investigation into the clinical relevance of these morphometric differences, particularly in improving airway management and refining approaches to swallowing function.</p>","PeriodicalId":9020,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Imaging","volume":"24 1","pages":"319"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11590560/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-024-01506-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to perform a comprehensive morphometric analysis of the epiglottis using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images, including the determination of epiglottis dimensions, the investigation of shape variations, and the assessment of their relationship with gender and age.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on high-quality CBCT images from 100 patients, obtained using the NewTom 5G system. In CBCT images, epiglottis thicknesses (right, midline, left) and horizontal angle at three levels (suprahyoid, hyoid, infrahyoid) were measured in axial sections, while the length and vertical angle of epiglottis were measured in midsagittal view. Epiglottis shapes were identified through 3D visualization.

Results: The midline epiglottis thicknesses were 4.68 mm at the suprahyoid level, 5.51 mm at the hyoid level, and 6.80 mm at the infrahyoid levels. Epiglottis thicknesses and length were statistically significantly greater in males. Of the 100 patients, 51 had a normal curvature, 41 had a flat epiglottis, and 8 had an omega epiglottis. The omega-shaped epiglottis was significantly longer compared to both the flat and normal curvature types (p = 0.011). There was a positive correlation between age and epiglottis thicknesses at the suprahyoid level and horizontal angles at three levels.

Conclusions: This study visualizes epiglottis morphology and uncovers significant morphometric differences. Males exhibit greater epiglottis thickness and length compared to females, while the omega-shaped epiglottis is notably longer than other types. These findings underscore the need for further investigation into the clinical relevance of these morphometric differences, particularly in improving airway management and refining approaches to swallowing function.

使用 CBCT 对会厌进行三维形态分析:年龄和性别差异。
研究背景本研究旨在利用锥束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)图像对会厌进行全面的形态计量分析,包括确定会厌尺寸、调查形状变化以及评估其与性别和年龄的关系:对 100 名患者使用 NewTom 5G 系统获得的高质量 CBCT 图像进行了回顾性分析。在 CBCT 图像中,在轴切面上测量了会厌厚度(右侧、中线、左侧)和三个层面(舌骨上、舌骨下、舌骨下)的水平角度,在中矢状面测量了会厌长度和垂直角度。通过三维可视化确定会厌形状:会厌中线厚度在舌骨上水平为 4.68 毫米,在舌骨水平为 5.51 毫米,在舌骨下水平为 6.80 毫米。据统计,男性会厌厚度和长度明显更大。在 100 名患者中,51 人的会厌弧度正常,41 人的会厌平坦,8 人的会厌呈欧米茄状。与平坦型和正常弧度型会厌相比,欧米茄型会厌明显更长(p = 0.011)。年龄与会厌舌骨上水平厚度和三个水平角度之间存在正相关:这项研究将会厌形态可视化,并发现了显著的形态差异。与女性相比,男性会厌的厚度和长度更大,而Ω形会厌明显长于其他类型。这些发现突出表明,有必要进一步研究这些形态差异的临床意义,尤其是在改善气道管理和完善吞咽功能的方法方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Medical Imaging
BMC Medical Imaging RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
3.70%
发文量
198
审稿时长
27 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Imaging is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in the development, evaluation, and use of imaging techniques and image processing tools to diagnose and manage disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信