A critical review on spatially explicit life cycle assessment methodologies and applications

IF 10.9 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Shuning Shi, Xiaoyu Yan
{"title":"A critical review on spatially explicit life cycle assessment methodologies and applications","authors":"Shuning Shi,&nbsp;Xiaoyu Yan","doi":"10.1016/j.spc.2024.11.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Life cycle assessment (LCA) studies that have involved spatial information in the life cycle inventory (LCI) and/or life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) phases have steadily increased in recent years. A comprehensive and up-to-date critical review of recent spatially explicit LCA studies is urgently needed to facilitate wider and consistent employment of spatially explicit LCA. This study collated, classified and critically reviewed studies published over the past two decades on LCA methodologies and applications that integrate spatial information. Among 86 spatially explicit studies reviewed, 61 focus on LCIA method development, 4 on LCI or LCA methodology development, and 21 are applications of existing methodologies in different regions and sectors. Mathematical algorithms developed using Python or MATLAB and LCA software tools such as OpenLCA and Brightway 2 are the most commonly used methodologies to integrate spatial information. The adoption of spatially explicit LCAs remains limited in general mainly due to the lack of high-resolution inventory data and the technical expertise required for implementation. There are trade-offs between the expected benefits and increased complexity of spatially explicit LCA, and its actual net effect compared with aspatial LCA is not yet clear. Context-based recommendations for implementing the existing spatially explicit LCA methodologies are provided. Future research should focus on high-resolution inventory data generation and disclosure, accessible spatially explicit LCI/LCIA methodology improvements and developments, and the establishment of frameworks to systematically quantify the benefits of spatially explicit LCA.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48619,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","volume":"52 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":10.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Production and Consumption","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352550924003270","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Life cycle assessment (LCA) studies that have involved spatial information in the life cycle inventory (LCI) and/or life cycle impact assessment (LCIA) phases have steadily increased in recent years. A comprehensive and up-to-date critical review of recent spatially explicit LCA studies is urgently needed to facilitate wider and consistent employment of spatially explicit LCA. This study collated, classified and critically reviewed studies published over the past two decades on LCA methodologies and applications that integrate spatial information. Among 86 spatially explicit studies reviewed, 61 focus on LCIA method development, 4 on LCI or LCA methodology development, and 21 are applications of existing methodologies in different regions and sectors. Mathematical algorithms developed using Python or MATLAB and LCA software tools such as OpenLCA and Brightway 2 are the most commonly used methodologies to integrate spatial information. The adoption of spatially explicit LCAs remains limited in general mainly due to the lack of high-resolution inventory data and the technical expertise required for implementation. There are trade-offs between the expected benefits and increased complexity of spatially explicit LCA, and its actual net effect compared with aspatial LCA is not yet clear. Context-based recommendations for implementing the existing spatially explicit LCA methodologies are provided. Future research should focus on high-resolution inventory data generation and disclosure, accessible spatially explicit LCI/LCIA methodology improvements and developments, and the establishment of frameworks to systematically quantify the benefits of spatially explicit LCA.
关于空间明确生命周期评估方法和应用的重要评论
近年来,在生命周期清单(LCI)和/或生命周期影响评估(LCIA)阶段涉及空间信息的生命周期评估(LCA)研究稳步增加。为了促进更广泛和一致地使用空间显式生命周期评估,迫切需要对近期的空间显式生命周期评估研究进行全面和最新的评论。本研究对过去二十年中发表的有关整合空间信息的生命周期评估方法和应用的研究进行了整理、分类和严格审查。在所审查的 86 项空间明确性研究中,61 项侧重于 LCIA 方法的开发,4 项侧重于 LCI 或 LCA 方法的开发,21 项是现有方法在不同地区和部门的应用。使用 Python 或 MATLAB 开发的数学算法以及 LCA 软件工具(如 OpenLCA 和 Brightway 2)是整合空间信息最常用的方法。空间显式生命周期评估的采用总体上仍然有限,主要原因是缺乏高分辨率清单数据和实施所需的专业技术知识。空间显式生命周期评估的预期效益与增加的复杂性之间存在权衡,其与空间生命周期评估相比的实际净效果尚不明确。本文就实施现有的空间明确性生命周期评估方法提出了基于背景的建议。未来的研究应侧重于高分辨率清单数据的生成和披露、可获取的空间明确性 LCI/LCIA 方法的改进和发展,以及系统量化空间明确性生命周期评估效益的框架的建立。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sustainable Production and Consumption
Sustainable Production and Consumption Environmental Science-Environmental Engineering
CiteScore
17.40
自引率
7.40%
发文量
389
审稿时长
13 days
期刊介绍: Sustainable production and consumption refers to the production and utilization of goods and services in a way that benefits society, is economically viable, and has minimal environmental impact throughout its entire lifespan. Our journal is dedicated to publishing top-notch interdisciplinary research and practical studies in this emerging field. We take a distinctive approach by examining the interplay between technology, consumption patterns, and policy to identify sustainable solutions for both production and consumption systems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信