What to expect from microscopic nuclear modelling for keff calculations?

IF 1.7 4区 物理与天体物理 Q2 PHYSICS, NUCLEAR
D. Rochman , A. Koning , S. Goriely , S. Hilaire
{"title":"What to expect from microscopic nuclear modelling for keff calculations?","authors":"D. Rochman ,&nbsp;A. Koning ,&nbsp;S. Goriely ,&nbsp;S. Hilaire","doi":"10.1016/j.nuclphysa.2024.122979","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Comparisons between predicted and benchmark k<sub>eff</sub> values from criticality-safety systems are often used as metrics to estimate the quality of evaluated nuclear data libraries. Relevant nuclear data for these critical systems generally come from a mixture of expert knowledge and phenomenological predictions. In the present work, we use solely microscopic nuclear modelling from TALYS to estimate actinides cross sections and angular distributions, and we compare the calculated MCNP k<sub>eff</sub> values for fast systems between the JEFF-3.3 evaluated library, phenomenological and microscopic modelling. The conclusion is that even if the evaluated library leads to the most adequate results, the microscopic nuclear modelling can reach very similar results for these integral quantities. It demonstrates the remarkable advances in the recent decades of microscopic nuclear reaction ingredients for applied integral observables.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":19246,"journal":{"name":"Nuclear Physics A","volume":"1054 ","pages":"Article 122979"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nuclear Physics A","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0375947424001611","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHYSICS, NUCLEAR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Comparisons between predicted and benchmark keff values from criticality-safety systems are often used as metrics to estimate the quality of evaluated nuclear data libraries. Relevant nuclear data for these critical systems generally come from a mixture of expert knowledge and phenomenological predictions. In the present work, we use solely microscopic nuclear modelling from TALYS to estimate actinides cross sections and angular distributions, and we compare the calculated MCNP keff values for fast systems between the JEFF-3.3 evaluated library, phenomenological and microscopic modelling. The conclusion is that even if the evaluated library leads to the most adequate results, the microscopic nuclear modelling can reach very similar results for these integral quantities. It demonstrates the remarkable advances in the recent decades of microscopic nuclear reaction ingredients for applied integral observables.
从微观核建模到 keff 计算的预期结果是什么?
临界安全系统的预测 Keff 值与基准 Keff 值之间的比较通常被用作评估核数据库质量的指标。这些临界系统的相关核数据通常来自专家知识和现象学预测的混合。在本研究中,我们仅使用 TALYS 的微观核建模来估算锕系元素的截面和角分布,并比较了 JEFF-3.3 评估库、现象学建模和微观建模计算出的快速系统 MCNP keff 值。结论是,即使评估库得出了最充分的结果,微观核建模也能为这些积分量得出非常相似的结果。这表明近几十年来应用积分观测量的微观核反应成分取得了显著进步。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nuclear Physics A
Nuclear Physics A 物理-物理:核物理
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
7.10%
发文量
113
审稿时长
61 days
期刊介绍: Nuclear Physics A focuses on the domain of nuclear and hadronic physics and includes the following subsections: Nuclear Structure and Dynamics; Intermediate and High Energy Heavy Ion Physics; Hadronic Physics; Electromagnetic and Weak Interactions; Nuclear Astrophysics. The emphasis is on original research papers. A number of carefully selected and reviewed conference proceedings are published as an integral part of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信