Pouching System Leakage and Peristomal Skin Complications Following Ostomy Surgery in the Immediate Postoperative Period: A Retrospective Review.

IF 1.7 3区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Cecilia Zamarripa, Alexandra Craig, Matthew T Kelly, Carol Mathews, Amy Folk
{"title":"Pouching System Leakage and Peristomal Skin Complications Following Ostomy Surgery in the Immediate Postoperative Period: A Retrospective Review.","authors":"Cecilia Zamarripa, Alexandra Craig, Matthew T Kelly, Carol Mathews, Amy Folk","doi":"10.1097/WON.0000000000001124","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to explore the performance of pouching systems with respect to leakage and the development of peristomal skin complications (PSCs) in an acute care setting immediately following ostomy creation.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Non-experimental, retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Subjects and setting: </strong>The sample comprised 214 patients admitted for stoma-creation surgery at one of the 2 University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Presbyterian-Shadyside campuses located in the Northeastern United States (Pittsburgh, PA). Patients were seen in an in-patient care setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Electronic health records from patients who were in the hospital for ostomy creation surgery were reviewed by wound ostomy continence nurses from each hospital. Demographic and selected clinical data were collected. The main outcome variables used to evaluate pouching system performance were leakage and PSCs. These outcomes were assessed starting at pouch placement in the operating room and at every subsequent pouch change (up to 5) through discharge or 2 weeks following surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Use of an elastic tapeless barrier (ETB) significantly reduced the risk of leakage compared to a ceramide-infused tape-border barrier (CIB) for patients (41% reduced risk of leakage, P = .011). Use of the ETB also reduced leakage risk compared to the CIB for patients who experienced leakage 2 or more times during the observation period (31% reduction in leakage risk, P = .043). Five types of PSCs occurred during the study and statistical analysis indicated no significant differences in the number of PSCs was documented between barrier types.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The use of an ETB significantly reduced the risk of leakage compared to a CIB.</p>","PeriodicalId":49950,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Wound Ostomy and Continence Nursing","volume":"51 6","pages":"478-483"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Wound Ostomy and Continence Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WON.0000000000001124","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to explore the performance of pouching systems with respect to leakage and the development of peristomal skin complications (PSCs) in an acute care setting immediately following ostomy creation.

Design: Non-experimental, retrospective cohort study.

Subjects and setting: The sample comprised 214 patients admitted for stoma-creation surgery at one of the 2 University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Presbyterian-Shadyside campuses located in the Northeastern United States (Pittsburgh, PA). Patients were seen in an in-patient care setting.

Methods: Electronic health records from patients who were in the hospital for ostomy creation surgery were reviewed by wound ostomy continence nurses from each hospital. Demographic and selected clinical data were collected. The main outcome variables used to evaluate pouching system performance were leakage and PSCs. These outcomes were assessed starting at pouch placement in the operating room and at every subsequent pouch change (up to 5) through discharge or 2 weeks following surgery.

Results: Use of an elastic tapeless barrier (ETB) significantly reduced the risk of leakage compared to a ceramide-infused tape-border barrier (CIB) for patients (41% reduced risk of leakage, P = .011). Use of the ETB also reduced leakage risk compared to the CIB for patients who experienced leakage 2 or more times during the observation period (31% reduction in leakage risk, P = .043). Five types of PSCs occurred during the study and statistical analysis indicated no significant differences in the number of PSCs was documented between barrier types.

Conclusion: The use of an ETB significantly reduced the risk of leakage compared to a CIB.

造口手术后即刻出现的布袋系统渗漏和肛周皮肤并发症:回顾性综述。
目的:本研究旨在探讨造口袋系统在造口术后急症护理环境中的渗漏和肛周皮肤并发症(PSCs)的表现:设计:非实验性、回顾性队列研究:样本包括在位于美国东北部(宾夕法尼亚州匹兹堡市)的匹兹堡大学医学中心 Presbyterian-Shadyside 两个校区之一接受造口手术的 214 名患者。患者在住院治疗环境中就诊:方法:每家医院的伤口造口护士对住院接受造口手术的患者的电子健康记录进行审查。收集了人口统计学和部分临床数据。用于评估造口袋系统性能的主要结果变量是渗漏和PSCs。这些结果从手术室放置尿袋开始评估,之后每次更换尿袋(最多 5 次)直至出院或术后 2 周:与注入陶瓷酰胺的胶带边界屏障(CIB)相比,使用弹性无胶带屏障(ETB)可显著降低患者的渗漏风险(渗漏风险降低 41%,P = .011)。与 CIB 相比,使用 ETB 也降低了在观察期间发生 2 次或 2 次以上渗漏的患者的渗漏风险(渗漏风险降低 31%,P = .043)。研究期间发生了五种类型的 PSC,统计分析表明不同屏障类型之间的 PSC 数量无明显差异:结论:与 CIB 相比,使用 ETB 能显著降低渗漏风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
34.60%
发文量
186
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​The Journal of Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nursing (JWOCN), the official journal of the Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society™ (WOCN®), is the premier publication for wound, ostomy and continence practice and research. The Journal’s mission is to publish current best evidence and original research to guide the delivery of expert health care. The WOCN Society is a professional nursing society which supports its members by promoting educational, clinical and research opportunities to advance the practice and guide the delivery of expert health care to individuals with wounds, ostomies and continence care needs.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信