Fracture Resistance, Surface Roughness, and Microtensile Bond Strength of Monolithic Zirconia to Resin Cements after Plasma Treatment.

Q3 Dentistry
Frontiers in Dentistry Pub Date : 2024-10-01 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.18502/fid.v21i37.16594
Mahsa Vafaei, Homayoon Alaghemand, Ghazaleh Ahmadizenous, Farshad Sohbatzadeh, Faraneh Mokhtarpour
{"title":"Fracture Resistance, Surface Roughness, and Microtensile Bond Strength of Monolithic Zirconia to Resin Cements after Plasma Treatment.","authors":"Mahsa Vafaei, Homayoon Alaghemand, Ghazaleh Ahmadizenous, Farshad Sohbatzadeh, Faraneh Mokhtarpour","doi":"10.18502/fid.v21i37.16594","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objectives:</b> This study aimed to assess the effect of surface treatment with plasma on surface roughness (SR) and fracture resistance (FR) of monolithic zirconia, and its microtensile bond strength (MTBS) to resin cements. <b>Materials and Methods:</b> This in vitro, experimental study was conducted on 40 monolithic zirconia crowns for FR test, 100 zirconia rods for MTBS test, and 40 zirconia blocks for profilometry. According to the surface treatment type, the samples were randomly assigned to 4 groups of (I) control (no surface treatment), (II) argon-oxygen plasma (AOP), (III) argon plasma (AP), and (IV) sandblasting (SB). FR of crowns and MTBS of zirconia rods to Allcem Dual and Panavia SA resin cements were measured by a universal testing machine, surface texture was evaluated by atomic force microscopy (AFM), and SR was measured by a profilometer. Data were analyzed by one-way and two-way ANOVA, Tukey's test, and independent t-test (alpha=0.05). <b>Results:</b> There was a significant difference in SR among the groups (P=0.003). The AP group had significantly lower SR than other groups (P=0.01). FR was not significantly different among the four groups. The MTBS in the SB and AOP groups was significantly higher than that in the control and AP groups for both resin cements. MTBS was not significantly different between the two resin cements within each group. <b>Conclusion:</b> None of the surface treatments affected the FR of zirconia crowns. AOP and sandblasting techniques increased the MTBS of zirconia to resin cements with unnoticeable change in SR.</p>","PeriodicalId":12445,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Dentistry","volume":"21 ","pages":"37"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11586640/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/fid.v21i37.16594","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to assess the effect of surface treatment with plasma on surface roughness (SR) and fracture resistance (FR) of monolithic zirconia, and its microtensile bond strength (MTBS) to resin cements. Materials and Methods: This in vitro, experimental study was conducted on 40 monolithic zirconia crowns for FR test, 100 zirconia rods for MTBS test, and 40 zirconia blocks for profilometry. According to the surface treatment type, the samples were randomly assigned to 4 groups of (I) control (no surface treatment), (II) argon-oxygen plasma (AOP), (III) argon plasma (AP), and (IV) sandblasting (SB). FR of crowns and MTBS of zirconia rods to Allcem Dual and Panavia SA resin cements were measured by a universal testing machine, surface texture was evaluated by atomic force microscopy (AFM), and SR was measured by a profilometer. Data were analyzed by one-way and two-way ANOVA, Tukey's test, and independent t-test (alpha=0.05). Results: There was a significant difference in SR among the groups (P=0.003). The AP group had significantly lower SR than other groups (P=0.01). FR was not significantly different among the four groups. The MTBS in the SB and AOP groups was significantly higher than that in the control and AP groups for both resin cements. MTBS was not significantly different between the two resin cements within each group. Conclusion: None of the surface treatments affected the FR of zirconia crowns. AOP and sandblasting techniques increased the MTBS of zirconia to resin cements with unnoticeable change in SR.

等离子处理后整体氧化锆与树脂粘结剂的抗断裂性、表面粗糙度和微拉伸粘结强度。
研究目的本研究旨在评估等离子体表面处理对整体氧化锆表面粗糙度(SR)、抗断裂强度(FR)及其与树脂水门汀的微拉伸结合强度(MTBS)的影响。材料和方法:这项体外实验研究对 40 个整体氧化锆冠进行了 FR 测试,对 100 根氧化锆棒进行了 MTBS 测试,并对 40 个氧化锆块进行了轮廓测量。根据表面处理类型,样品被随机分配为 4 组:(I) 对照组(无表面处理)、(II) 氩氧等离子体组 (AOP)、(III) 氩等离子体组 (AP) 和 (IV) 喷砂组 (SB)。用万能试验机测量牙冠的 FR 值和氧化锆棒与 Allcem Dual 和 Panavia SA 树脂水门汀的 MTBS 值,用原子力显微镜(AFM)评估表面纹理,用轮廓仪测量 SR 值。数据分析采用单因素和双因素方差分析、Tukey 检验和独立 t 检验(α=0.05)。结果各组间的 SR 有明显差异(P=0.003)。AP 组的 SR 明显低于其他组(P=0.01)。四组的 FR 无明显差异。对于两种树脂水门汀,SB 组和 AOP 组的 MTBS 都明显高于对照组和 AP 组。各组内两种树脂水门汀的 MTBS 无明显差异。结论所有表面处理方法都不会影响氧化锆冠的FR。AOP和喷砂技术增加了氧化锆对树脂水门汀的MTBS,而SR的变化并不明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Frontiers in Dentistry
Frontiers in Dentistry Dentistry-General Dentistry
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信