A Two-Country Questionnaire Study of Biomedical Student Opinions Regarding Online Teaching During COVID-19.

Irena Ognjanovic, Irina Yakushina, Elena Shustikova, Maria Mikerova, Vladimir Reshetnikov, Sara Mijailovic, Jelena Nedeljkovic, Dragan Milovanovic, Ljiljana Tasic, Vladimir Jakovljevic, Tamara Nikolic Turnic
{"title":"A Two-Country Questionnaire Study of Biomedical Student Opinions Regarding Online Teaching During COVID-19.","authors":"Irena Ognjanovic, Irina Yakushina, Elena Shustikova, Maria Mikerova, Vladimir Reshetnikov, Sara Mijailovic, Jelena Nedeljkovic, Dragan Milovanovic, Ljiljana Tasic, Vladimir Jakovljevic, Tamara Nikolic Turnic","doi":"10.3390/epidemiologia5040048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this study was to compare the opinions of biomedical students from Russia and Central Serbia about learning methods in the time of the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a comparative questionnaire study that used the validated questionnaire tool eMedQ, conducted via the online platform Anketolog.ru from February to May 2022 at Sechenov University and the University of Kragujevac in the same period. At Sechenov University, 694 students took part in the survey, while at the University of Kragujevac, the total number of participants was 209. The eMedQ questionnaire, in Russian and Serbian, consists of 45 closed-ended questions with 7 domains: demographic characteristics, experience with online teaching, education process (teaching organization), aspects of mental functioning, clinical skills, technical aspects, and quality of life.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the COVID-19 lockdown, in Serbian and Russian biomedical faculties, we observed the high flexibility of Russian students with greater experience when it comes to online education before the pandemic compared to students from Serbia. Also, the Russian students declared that they were strongly motivated to achieve clinical skills and to learn, while a larger number of Serbian students reported disrupted mental functioning and learning problems.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>At the time of isolation, at Serbian and Russian biomedical faculties, we noticed the higher flexibility of Russian students with more experience than students from Serbia. Also, the Russian students declared that they were strongly motivated both to acquire clinical skills and to learn, while a larger number of Serbian students reported reduced mental functioning and learning problems.</p>","PeriodicalId":72944,"journal":{"name":"Epidemiolgia (Basel, Switzerland)","volume":"5 4","pages":"692-705"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11587014/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Epidemiolgia (Basel, Switzerland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/epidemiologia5040048","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to compare the opinions of biomedical students from Russia and Central Serbia about learning methods in the time of the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: This is a comparative questionnaire study that used the validated questionnaire tool eMedQ, conducted via the online platform Anketolog.ru from February to May 2022 at Sechenov University and the University of Kragujevac in the same period. At Sechenov University, 694 students took part in the survey, while at the University of Kragujevac, the total number of participants was 209. The eMedQ questionnaire, in Russian and Serbian, consists of 45 closed-ended questions with 7 domains: demographic characteristics, experience with online teaching, education process (teaching organization), aspects of mental functioning, clinical skills, technical aspects, and quality of life.

Results: During the COVID-19 lockdown, in Serbian and Russian biomedical faculties, we observed the high flexibility of Russian students with greater experience when it comes to online education before the pandemic compared to students from Serbia. Also, the Russian students declared that they were strongly motivated to achieve clinical skills and to learn, while a larger number of Serbian students reported disrupted mental functioning and learning problems.

Conclusions: At the time of isolation, at Serbian and Russian biomedical faculties, we noticed the higher flexibility of Russian students with more experience than students from Serbia. Also, the Russian students declared that they were strongly motivated both to acquire clinical skills and to learn, while a larger number of Serbian students reported reduced mental functioning and learning problems.

关于 COVID-19 期间生物医学学生对在线教学看法的两国问卷调查研究。
研究背景本研究的目的是比较俄罗斯和塞尔维亚中部地区生物医学专业学生对 COVID-19 大流行时期学习方法的看法:这是一项比较问卷调查研究,使用了经过验证的问卷工具 eMedQ,于 2022 年 2 月至 5 月通过在线平台 Anketolog.ru 在塞切诺夫大学和克拉古耶瓦茨大学进行。塞切诺夫大学共有 694 名学生参加了调查,克拉古耶瓦茨大学共有 209 名学生参加了调查。eMedQ 问卷用俄语和塞尔维亚语编制,由 45 个封闭式问题组成,涉及 7 个领域:人口统计特征、在线教学经验、教育过程(教学组织)、心理功能方面、临床技能、技术方面和生活质量:结果:在 COVID-19 封锁期间,我们在塞尔维亚和俄罗斯的生物医学院系观察到,与塞尔维亚学生相比,俄罗斯学生的灵活性很高,他们在大流行前的在线教育方面拥有更丰富的经验。此外,俄罗斯学生表示,他们有很强的动力去掌握临床技能和学习,而更多的塞尔维亚学生则表示,他们的心理功能受到了干扰,出现了学习问题:我们注意到,在塞尔维亚和俄罗斯的生物医学学院进行隔离时,经验丰富的俄罗斯学生比塞尔维亚学生更灵活。此外,俄罗斯学生宣称他们对获得临床技能和学习都有很强的动力,而更多的塞尔维亚学生则报告说他们的心理功能减退和学习有问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
7 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信