Heat strain differences walking in hot-dry and warm-wet environments of equivalent wet bulb globe temperature.

Q1 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Temperature Pub Date : 2024-08-26 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1080/23328940.2024.2384185
Nathan E Bartman, Nicole T Vargas, Lora A Cavuoto, David Hostler, Riana R Pryor
{"title":"Heat strain differences walking in hot-dry and warm-wet environments of equivalent wet bulb globe temperature.","authors":"Nathan E Bartman, Nicole T Vargas, Lora A Cavuoto, David Hostler, Riana R Pryor","doi":"10.1080/23328940.2024.2384185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Wet bulb globe temperature (WBGT) is a commonly used measure to predict heat strain in workers. Different combinations of environmental conditions can create equivalent WBGT, yet it remains unknown whether biophysical, physiological, and perceptual responses vary when working in different but equivalent hot conditions. The purpose of the study was to compare body heat storage and physiological and perceptual strain during walking in hot-dry and warm-wet conditions of the same WBGT. Twelve subjects (age: 22 ± 2 y) walked for 90 min at 60% maximum heart rate in a 27.8°C WBGT environment of hot-dry (HD: 40°C, 19% relative humidity) or warm-wet (WW: 30°C, 77% relative humidity) conditions. Partitional calorimetry was used to estimate heat storage. Core temperature at 90 min (HD: 38.5 ± 0.5°C; WW: 38.4 ± 0.3°C, <i>p</i> = 0.244) and cumulative heat storage (HD: 115 ± 531 Kj; WW: 333 ± 269 Kj, <i>p</i> = 0.242) were not different. At 90 min, heart rate was not different (HD: 160 ± 19 bpm; WW: 154 ± 15 bpm, <i>p</i> = 0.149) but skin temperature (HD: 36.6 ± 0.9°C; WW: 34.7 ± 0.6°C, <i>p</i> < 0.001), thirst (HD: 6.8 a.u.; WW: 5.3 a.u. <i>p</i> = 0.043), and sweat rate (HD: 15.1 ± 4.4 g·min<sup>-1</sup>; WW: 10.0 ± 4.1 g·min<sup>-1</sup>, <i>p</i> < 0.001) were greater in HD compared to WW. Hot environments of equivalent 27.8°C WBGT created equivalent core temperature despite differences in physiological strain during exercise, including earlier onset of cardiovascular strain, greater sweat rate, and higher skin temperature compared to a WW environment. ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT04624919.</p>","PeriodicalId":36837,"journal":{"name":"Temperature","volume":"11 4","pages":"333-349"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11583583/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Temperature","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23328940.2024.2384185","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Wet bulb globe temperature (WBGT) is a commonly used measure to predict heat strain in workers. Different combinations of environmental conditions can create equivalent WBGT, yet it remains unknown whether biophysical, physiological, and perceptual responses vary when working in different but equivalent hot conditions. The purpose of the study was to compare body heat storage and physiological and perceptual strain during walking in hot-dry and warm-wet conditions of the same WBGT. Twelve subjects (age: 22 ± 2 y) walked for 90 min at 60% maximum heart rate in a 27.8°C WBGT environment of hot-dry (HD: 40°C, 19% relative humidity) or warm-wet (WW: 30°C, 77% relative humidity) conditions. Partitional calorimetry was used to estimate heat storage. Core temperature at 90 min (HD: 38.5 ± 0.5°C; WW: 38.4 ± 0.3°C, p = 0.244) and cumulative heat storage (HD: 115 ± 531 Kj; WW: 333 ± 269 Kj, p = 0.242) were not different. At 90 min, heart rate was not different (HD: 160 ± 19 bpm; WW: 154 ± 15 bpm, p = 0.149) but skin temperature (HD: 36.6 ± 0.9°C; WW: 34.7 ± 0.6°C, p < 0.001), thirst (HD: 6.8 a.u.; WW: 5.3 a.u. p = 0.043), and sweat rate (HD: 15.1 ± 4.4 g·min-1; WW: 10.0 ± 4.1 g·min-1, p < 0.001) were greater in HD compared to WW. Hot environments of equivalent 27.8°C WBGT created equivalent core temperature despite differences in physiological strain during exercise, including earlier onset of cardiovascular strain, greater sweat rate, and higher skin temperature compared to a WW environment. ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT04624919.

在湿球温度相等的干热和温湿环境中行走的热应变差异。
湿球温度(WBGT)是预测工人热应变的常用指标。不同的环境条件组合可产生等效的 WBGT,但在不同但等效的高温条件下工作时,生物物理、生理和知觉反应是否会有所不同,目前仍是未知数。本研究的目的是比较在相同 WBGT 的干热和温湿条件下行走时的体热储存以及生理和知觉应变。12 名受试者(年龄:22 ± 2 岁)在 27.8°C WBGT 的高温干燥(HD:40°C,相对湿度 19%)或温湿(WW:30°C,相对湿度 77%)环境中,以 60% 的最大心率步行 90 分钟。采用部分量热法估算热量储存。90 分钟时的核心温度(HD:38.5 ± 0.5°C;WW:38.4 ± 0.3°C,p = 0.244)和累积热量储存(HD:115 ± 531 Kj;WW:333 ± 269 Kj,p = 0.242)没有差异。90 分钟时,心率没有差异(HD:160 ± 19 bpm;WW:154 ± 15 bpm,p = 0.149),但皮肤温度(HD:36.6 ± 0.9°C;WW:34.7 ± 0.6°C,p = 0.043)和出汗率(HD:15.1 ± 4.4 g-min-1;WW:10.0 ± 4.1 g-min-1,p = 0.043)却有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Temperature
Temperature Medicine-Physiology (medical)
CiteScore
10.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信