The rising tide: Trends in induction of labor at term over a 5-year period at a single centre.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Sarah M Nicholson, Susan Hatt, Etaoin M Kent, Michael P Geary, Patrick Dicker, Zara E Molphy, Karen Flood, Fergal D Malone
{"title":"The rising tide: Trends in induction of labor at term over a 5-year period at a single centre.","authors":"Sarah M Nicholson, Susan Hatt, Etaoin M Kent, Michael P Geary, Patrick Dicker, Zara E Molphy, Karen Flood, Fergal D Malone","doi":"10.1002/ijgo.16054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Induction of labor (IOL) is a controversial topic in contemporary obstetric practice, with some suggesting that the increase in elective induction (eIOL) as a potential contributor to increasing cesarean delivery (CD) rates. The objectives of this single-center study were to examine the rates of IOL, trends in indications for IOL, and the contribution of IOL to the overall CD rate at one of Europe's largest obstetric hospitals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective observational cohort study evaluated the outcomes of patients who were delivered following IOL from 2018 to 2022 inclusive at the largest obstetric hospital in Ireland.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 36 938 women (16 155 nulliparous and 20 783 multiparous) were delivered during the 5-year study period, of whom 8072 nulliparous and 6343 multiparous women underwent IOL. There was a significant increase in rates of induction, increasing from 42% to 57% (P <0.001) in nulliparous women, and from 27% to 33% (P < 0.001) in multiparous women. The highest contributions to the hospital CD rate were from those being induced for 'fetal' (5%), spontaneous rupture of membranes ('SROM') (4%), and 'maternal' (4%) reasons, with the lowest CD rates in the eIOL category (<1%) in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our data confirm that the rate of IOL is increasing. The contribution of maternal and fetal reasons for IOL to the overall CD rate may reflect increasing numbers of higher-risk pregnancies. Despite current controversy regarding the role of eIOL, our data do not confirm a significant contribution to either the overall IOL or CD rates in this center.</p>","PeriodicalId":14164,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.16054","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Induction of labor (IOL) is a controversial topic in contemporary obstetric practice, with some suggesting that the increase in elective induction (eIOL) as a potential contributor to increasing cesarean delivery (CD) rates. The objectives of this single-center study were to examine the rates of IOL, trends in indications for IOL, and the contribution of IOL to the overall CD rate at one of Europe's largest obstetric hospitals.

Methods: This retrospective observational cohort study evaluated the outcomes of patients who were delivered following IOL from 2018 to 2022 inclusive at the largest obstetric hospital in Ireland.

Results: A total of 36 938 women (16 155 nulliparous and 20 783 multiparous) were delivered during the 5-year study period, of whom 8072 nulliparous and 6343 multiparous women underwent IOL. There was a significant increase in rates of induction, increasing from 42% to 57% (P <0.001) in nulliparous women, and from 27% to 33% (P < 0.001) in multiparous women. The highest contributions to the hospital CD rate were from those being induced for 'fetal' (5%), spontaneous rupture of membranes ('SROM') (4%), and 'maternal' (4%) reasons, with the lowest CD rates in the eIOL category (<1%) in both groups.

Conclusion: Our data confirm that the rate of IOL is increasing. The contribution of maternal and fetal reasons for IOL to the overall CD rate may reflect increasing numbers of higher-risk pregnancies. Despite current controversy regarding the role of eIOL, our data do not confirm a significant contribution to either the overall IOL or CD rates in this center.

潮起潮落:一个中心 5 年间的临产引产趋势。
目的:引产(IOL)是当代产科实践中一个有争议的话题,一些人认为选择性引产(eIOL)的增加是导致剖宫产率(CD)上升的潜在因素。这项单中心研究的目的是在欧洲最大的产科医院之一检查 IOL 的使用率、IOL 适应症的趋势以及 IOL 对总体剖宫产率的贡献:这项回顾性观察队列研究评估了2018年至2022年(含2022年)在爱尔兰最大的产科医院进行IOL后分娩的患者的结果:在为期5年的研究期间,共有36 938名产妇(16 155名单胎产妇和20 783名多胎产妇)接受了IOL分娩,其中8072名单胎产妇和6343名多胎产妇接受了IOL分娩。引产率明显上升,从 42% 上升至 57%(P 结语:我们的数据证实了 IOL 的使用率从 42% 上升至 57%:我们的数据证实,人工流产率正在上升。母体和胎儿原因导致的 IOL 对总 CD 率的贡献可能反映了高危妊娠数量的增加。尽管目前对电子人工晶体的作用存在争议,但我们的数据并未证实电子人工晶体对该中心的总体 IOL 或 CD 率有显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
493
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics publishes articles on all aspects of basic and clinical research in the fields of obstetrics and gynecology and related subjects, with emphasis on matters of worldwide interest.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信