Degenerateness, Mental Hygiene, and Spiritism: Debates in the Argentine Medical Press (1930–1946)

IF 0.6 3区 历史学 Q3 HISTORY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES
Alejandro Parra
{"title":"Degenerateness, Mental Hygiene, and Spiritism: Debates in the Argentine Medical Press (1930–1946)","authors":"Alejandro Parra","doi":"10.1002/jhbs.70003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>The disputes between spiritualists and physicians occurred in the context of hygienism and the degeneration theory, where spiritualists were considered agents requiring health care by alienists and psychiatrists. French psychiatry defended this interpretation to isolate and treat “spiritual delirium,” which came to have considerable importance in the debates between spiritism and psychiatry. Specifically, <i>pathologization</i> and <i>psychologization</i> became strategies to deal with the disruptive experience of mediumship and the sense of threat from spiritualism. Psychiatrists initiated anti-spiritualist campaigns, inspiring responses from the spiritualist communities and their representatives, along with arguments to refute such diagnostic criteria. The debates between alienists and spiritists are an example of how, the rhetoric of spiritists, physicians, and some philosophers led to hostile positions regarding the designation of limits in the recognition of psychological and religious experiences.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":46047,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences","volume":"61 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jhbs.70003","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The disputes between spiritualists and physicians occurred in the context of hygienism and the degeneration theory, where spiritualists were considered agents requiring health care by alienists and psychiatrists. French psychiatry defended this interpretation to isolate and treat “spiritual delirium,” which came to have considerable importance in the debates between spiritism and psychiatry. Specifically, pathologization and psychologization became strategies to deal with the disruptive experience of mediumship and the sense of threat from spiritualism. Psychiatrists initiated anti-spiritualist campaigns, inspiring responses from the spiritualist communities and their representatives, along with arguments to refute such diagnostic criteria. The debates between alienists and spiritists are an example of how, the rhetoric of spiritists, physicians, and some philosophers led to hostile positions regarding the designation of limits in the recognition of psychological and religious experiences.

堕落、精神卫生和唯灵论:阿根廷医学报刊上的辩论(1930-1946 年)
灵修主义者与医生之间的争论是在卫生学和退化理论的背景下发生的,灵修主义者被外来学家和精神病学家视为需要保健的代理人。法国精神病学捍卫这种解释,以隔离和治疗 "精神错乱",这在灵修主义和精神病学之间的争论中具有相当重要的意义。具体地说,病理化和心理化成为应对灵媒的破坏性体验和灵异主义威胁感的策略。精神病学家发起了反灵论运动,激发了灵论团体及其代表的回应,并提出了反驳此类诊断标准的论据。灵异论者、医生和一些哲学家之间的争论就是一个例子,他们的言论导致了对心理和宗教体验的认知限制的敌对立场。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
16.70%
发文量
69
期刊介绍: The Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences is a quarterly, peer-reviewed, international journal devoted to the scientific, technical, institutional, and cultural history of the social and behavioral sciences. The journal publishes research articles, book reviews, and news and notes that cover the development of the core disciplines of psychology, anthropology, sociology, psychiatry and psychoanalysis, economics, linguistics, communications, political science, and the neurosciences. The journal also welcomes papers and book reviews in related fields, particularly the history of science and medicine, historical theory, and historiography.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信