The clinical and economic value of enhanced influenza vaccines for the elderly in Argentina

IF 2.7 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY
Analía Urueña , Paula Micone , Joaquín Mould-Quevedo , Carolina Saenz , Micaela Delgado , José Luis Montes , Norberto Giglio
{"title":"The clinical and economic value of enhanced influenza vaccines for the elderly in Argentina","authors":"Analía Urueña ,&nbsp;Paula Micone ,&nbsp;Joaquín Mould-Quevedo ,&nbsp;Carolina Saenz ,&nbsp;Micaela Delgado ,&nbsp;José Luis Montes ,&nbsp;Norberto Giglio","doi":"10.1016/j.jvacx.2024.100587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Enhanced influenza vaccines are the best option for the elderly. In 2021, Argentina introduced the MF59-adjuvanted inactivated influenza vaccine (aIIV) for individuals aged 65 years. and above, in the national immunization program. High dose inactivated influenza vaccine (HD-IIV) is also currently registered. This study evaluates the clinical and economic outcomes of these noted enhanced influenza vaccines for the elderly in Argentina.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Using a static decision-tree model and adopting the payer's perspective during an average influenza season, the analysis incorporated influenza epidemiological data from pre-pandemic Argentinian seasons (2014–2019), strain distribution, vaccination uptake, influenza-related costs and Quality-Adjusted Life-Years (QALYs) gained. Results include two relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) scenarios from two published meta-analyses, due to reported rVE variability, although without statistical significance expected between enhanced vaccines. Vaccination acquisition costs were obtained from aIIV manufacturer, while HD-IIV costs were estimated using local (Argentinian private sector) and international public sector data (Europe). This assessment considered one GDP per-capita (US$13,696) as a cost-effectiveness threshold and included multiple sensitivity analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>With an expected lower vaccine cost and non-significant higher rVE for aIIV vs HD-IIV (3.2 %), aIIV generated 41.4 QALYs gained and US$8.7 M savings to the Argentinean public health system. In this scenario aIIV resulted as a dominant strategy over HD-IIV. On a second scenario, where HD-IIV has a non-significant higher rVE compared to aIIV (15.9 % and 13.9 % for HD-IIV and aIIV, respectively, both vs standard-dose IIV), HD-IIV would only result cost-effective compared to aIIV if its public price is up to 25 % the incremental cost in relation to the standard-dose IIV acquisition price.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In Argentina, the use of enhanced influenza vaccines in the elderly can increase vaccine effectiveness, reduce mortality and disease-related costs. Based on comparable effectiveness, the economic advantage of aIIV over HD-IIV confirms the current vaccination strategy employing aIIV in Argentina.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":43021,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine: X","volume":"21 ","pages":"Article 100587"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vaccine: X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590136224001608","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Enhanced influenza vaccines are the best option for the elderly. In 2021, Argentina introduced the MF59-adjuvanted inactivated influenza vaccine (aIIV) for individuals aged 65 years. and above, in the national immunization program. High dose inactivated influenza vaccine (HD-IIV) is also currently registered. This study evaluates the clinical and economic outcomes of these noted enhanced influenza vaccines for the elderly in Argentina.

Methods

Using a static decision-tree model and adopting the payer's perspective during an average influenza season, the analysis incorporated influenza epidemiological data from pre-pandemic Argentinian seasons (2014–2019), strain distribution, vaccination uptake, influenza-related costs and Quality-Adjusted Life-Years (QALYs) gained. Results include two relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) scenarios from two published meta-analyses, due to reported rVE variability, although without statistical significance expected between enhanced vaccines. Vaccination acquisition costs were obtained from aIIV manufacturer, while HD-IIV costs were estimated using local (Argentinian private sector) and international public sector data (Europe). This assessment considered one GDP per-capita (US$13,696) as a cost-effectiveness threshold and included multiple sensitivity analysis.

Results

With an expected lower vaccine cost and non-significant higher rVE for aIIV vs HD-IIV (3.2 %), aIIV generated 41.4 QALYs gained and US$8.7 M savings to the Argentinean public health system. In this scenario aIIV resulted as a dominant strategy over HD-IIV. On a second scenario, where HD-IIV has a non-significant higher rVE compared to aIIV (15.9 % and 13.9 % for HD-IIV and aIIV, respectively, both vs standard-dose IIV), HD-IIV would only result cost-effective compared to aIIV if its public price is up to 25 % the incremental cost in relation to the standard-dose IIV acquisition price.

Conclusions

In Argentina, the use of enhanced influenza vaccines in the elderly can increase vaccine effectiveness, reduce mortality and disease-related costs. Based on comparable effectiveness, the economic advantage of aIIV over HD-IIV confirms the current vaccination strategy employing aIIV in Argentina.
阿根廷老年人强化流感疫苗的临床和经济价值
背景强化流感疫苗是老年人的最佳选择。2021 年,阿根廷在国家免疫计划中为 65 岁及以上人群引入了 MF59 佐剂灭活流感疫苗(aIIV)。高剂量灭活流感疫苗(HD-IIV)目前也已注册。本研究评估了阿根廷老年人接种这些知名强化流感疫苗的临床和经济效果。方法采用静态决策树模型,从平均流感季节的支付方角度出发,分析了阿根廷流感大流行前季节(2014-2019 年)的流感流行病学数据、菌株分布、疫苗接种率、流感相关成本和获得的质量调整生命年 (QALY)。结果包括两个已发表的荟萃分析中的两种相对疫苗效力(rVE)方案,因为据报道rVE存在变异,尽管增强型疫苗之间没有统计学意义。疫苗接种成本来自于疫苗生产商,而 HD-IIV 成本是利用当地(阿根廷私营部门)和国际公共部门(欧洲)的数据估算的。评估将人均 GDP(13,696 美元)作为成本效益阈值,并进行了多重敏感性分析。结果aIIV 与 HD-IIV 相比,预期疫苗成本较低,rVE(3.2%)不明显较高,aIIV 为阿根廷公共卫生系统带来了 41.4 QALYs 的收益,节省了 870 万美元。在这种情况下,aIIV 比 HD-IIV 成了一种占主导地位的策略。在第二种情况下,HD-IIV 的 rVE 比 aIIV 高(HD-IIV 和 aIIV 与标准剂量 IIV 相比分别为 15.9% 和 13.9%),但只有当 HD-IIV 的公共价格达到标准剂量 IIV 采购价格增量成本的 25% 时,HD-IIV 与 aIIV 相比才具有成本效益。在效果可比的基础上,aIIV 相对于 HD-IIV 的经济优势证实了阿根廷目前使用 aIIV 的疫苗接种策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Vaccine: X
Vaccine: X Multiple-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
102
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信