Optimization of deficit irrigation level and phosphorus fertilizer rate for soybean production in Jimma, Southwest Ethiopia

IF 5.9 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Minda Tadesse , Addisu Asefa , Robel Admasu , Etefa Tilahun
{"title":"Optimization of deficit irrigation level and phosphorus fertilizer rate for soybean production in Jimma, Southwest Ethiopia","authors":"Minda Tadesse ,&nbsp;Addisu Asefa ,&nbsp;Robel Admasu ,&nbsp;Etefa Tilahun","doi":"10.1016/j.agwat.2024.109189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Soybean is a vital oil crop in Ethiopia to attract foreign income. In southwest Ethiopia's irrigated conditions, phosphorus fertilization and water stress limits soybean yield. A three-year field experiment (2018/19–2020/21) assessed the impact of deficit irrigation (DI) and phosphorus rate (P rate) on crop water productivity (WP<sub>c</sub>), agronomic efficiency of phosphorus (AE<sub>P</sub>) and soybean yields. It included two DI levels and one control treatment (I50 = 50 % ETc, I75 = 75 % ETc, and I100 = 100 % ETc) in the main plot and five P rates (P0 = 0, P10 = 10, P20 = 20, P30 = 30, and P40 = 40 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> P) in the subplot, arranged in a randomized split plot design with three replicates. P rates were optimized for each DI level using a quadratic polynomial regression model, predicting maximum agronomic yield and economically optimal P rate based on yield and cultivation cost. The study's results demonstrated a highly significant difference in soybean yield, WP<sub>c</sub>, and AE<sub>P</sub> among various P treatments. Furthermore, the highest WP<sub>c</sub> (0.63 kg m<sup>−3</sup>) and AE<sub>P</sub> (31.67 kg kg<sup>−1</sup>) were achieved with treatments with 30 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> P and 10 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> P. Among DI treatments, 75 % ETc reduced water usage by 25 % and increased WP<sub>c</sub> by 13.3 %. The application of 30 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> P improved WP<sub>c</sub> and increased yield by 91 % and 90 %, respectively. The combined effect of I100×P30 significantly increased plant height (68.23 cm), dry matter (4.4 t ha<sup>−1</sup>), and yield (2965.49 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>) by 40.3 %, 104.3 %, and 215.2 %, respectively. The maximum WP<sub>c</sub> (0.83 kg m<sup>−3</sup>) and the lowest (0.30 kg m<sup>−3</sup>) were achieved at I50×P30 and I100×P0, respectively. The lowest AE<sub>P</sub> (9.36 kg ha<sup>−1</sup>) was obtained at I50×P40, while AE<sub>P</sub> (64.49 kg kg<sup>−1</sup>) significantly improved by 85 % at I100×P10. The maximum agronomic yields ranged from 1842.5 to 2895 kg ha⁻¹, with the corresponding combined treatments of I50×P26 to I100×P32. Economically optimal P rates ranged from 26 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> (I50) to 31 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> P (I100), giving net returns of $1666.1 to $3028.4 ha<sup>−1</sup>. Efficient management of DI and P can optimize irrigation, reduce P losses, and mitigate economic and environmental risks. Based on the result of this finding, applying 31 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> of P under 100 % ETc and 28 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> of P under 75 % ETc is recommended as the optimal P application strategy to achieve higher yield, WP<sub>c</sub>, AE<sub>P</sub>, and maximize economic returns in southwest Ethiopia. In addition, the breeder needs to develop soybean varieties that are more resistant to water stress and efficient in P uptake.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7634,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Water Management","volume":"306 ","pages":"Article 109189"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Water Management","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378377424005250","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Soybean is a vital oil crop in Ethiopia to attract foreign income. In southwest Ethiopia's irrigated conditions, phosphorus fertilization and water stress limits soybean yield. A three-year field experiment (2018/19–2020/21) assessed the impact of deficit irrigation (DI) and phosphorus rate (P rate) on crop water productivity (WPc), agronomic efficiency of phosphorus (AEP) and soybean yields. It included two DI levels and one control treatment (I50 = 50 % ETc, I75 = 75 % ETc, and I100 = 100 % ETc) in the main plot and five P rates (P0 = 0, P10 = 10, P20 = 20, P30 = 30, and P40 = 40 kg ha−1 P) in the subplot, arranged in a randomized split plot design with three replicates. P rates were optimized for each DI level using a quadratic polynomial regression model, predicting maximum agronomic yield and economically optimal P rate based on yield and cultivation cost. The study's results demonstrated a highly significant difference in soybean yield, WPc, and AEP among various P treatments. Furthermore, the highest WPc (0.63 kg m−3) and AEP (31.67 kg kg−1) were achieved with treatments with 30 kg ha−1 P and 10 kg ha−1 P. Among DI treatments, 75 % ETc reduced water usage by 25 % and increased WPc by 13.3 %. The application of 30 kg ha−1 P improved WPc and increased yield by 91 % and 90 %, respectively. The combined effect of I100×P30 significantly increased plant height (68.23 cm), dry matter (4.4 t ha−1), and yield (2965.49 kg ha−1) by 40.3 %, 104.3 %, and 215.2 %, respectively. The maximum WPc (0.83 kg m−3) and the lowest (0.30 kg m−3) were achieved at I50×P30 and I100×P0, respectively. The lowest AEP (9.36 kg ha−1) was obtained at I50×P40, while AEP (64.49 kg kg−1) significantly improved by 85 % at I100×P10. The maximum agronomic yields ranged from 1842.5 to 2895 kg ha⁻¹, with the corresponding combined treatments of I50×P26 to I100×P32. Economically optimal P rates ranged from 26 kg ha−1 (I50) to 31 kg ha−1 P (I100), giving net returns of $1666.1 to $3028.4 ha−1. Efficient management of DI and P can optimize irrigation, reduce P losses, and mitigate economic and environmental risks. Based on the result of this finding, applying 31 kg ha−1 of P under 100 % ETc and 28 kg ha−1 of P under 75 % ETc is recommended as the optimal P application strategy to achieve higher yield, WPc, AEP, and maximize economic returns in southwest Ethiopia. In addition, the breeder needs to develop soybean varieties that are more resistant to water stress and efficient in P uptake.
优化埃塞俄比亚西南部吉马地区大豆生产的亏缺灌溉水平和磷肥施用量
大豆是埃塞俄比亚吸引外来收入的重要油料作物。在埃塞俄比亚西南部的灌溉条件下,磷肥和水胁迫限制了大豆产量。一项为期三年(2018/19-2020/21)的田间试验评估了亏缺灌溉(DI)和磷率(P率)对作物水分生产率(WPc)、磷的农艺效率(AEP)和大豆产量的影响。该研究在主小区包括两个 DI 水平和一个对照处理(I50 = 50 % ETc、I75 = 75 % ETc 和 I100 = 100 % ETc),在副小区包括五个磷率(P0 = 0、P10 = 10、P20 = 20、P30 = 30 和 P40 = 40 kg ha-1 P),采用随机分小区设计,三次重复。利用二次多项式回归模型对每个 DI 水平的 P 率进行了优化,根据产量和种植成本预测了最大农艺学产量和经济上的最佳 P 率。研究结果表明,在不同的磷肥处理中,大豆产量、WPc 和 AEP 的差异非常显著。此外,30 kg ha-1 P 和 10 kg ha-1 P 处理的 WPc(0.63 kg m-3)和 AEP(31.67 kg kg-1)最高。在 DI 处理中,75 % ETc 使用水量减少 25%,WPc 增加 13.3%。施用 30 kg ha-1 P 可分别提高 WPc 和产量 91 % 和 90 %。I100×P30 的综合效应显著增加了株高(68.23 厘米)、干物质(4.4 吨/公顷-1)和产量(2965.49 千克/公顷-1),增幅分别为 40.3%、104.3% 和 215.2%。在 I50×P30 和 I100×P0 条件下,WPc 分别达到最高(0.83 kg m-3)和最低(0.30 kg m-3)。在 I50×P40 时,AEP 最低(9.36 千克/公顷-1),而在 I100×P10 时,AEP(64.49 千克/千克-1)显著提高了 85%。在 I50×P26 至 I100×P32 的相应组合处理中,最高农艺产量为 1842.5 至 2895 千克/公顷-¹。最经济的磷肥用量为 26 千克/公顷-1(I50)至 31 千克/公顷-1(I100),净收益为 1666.1 美元至 3028.4 美元/公顷-1。DI 和 P 的高效管理可以优化灌溉,减少 P 损失,降低经济和环境风险。根据这一研究结果,建议在埃塞俄比亚西南部地区,在 100 % ETc 条件下每公顷施用 31 千克磷,在 75 % ETc 条件下每公顷施用 28 千克磷,以获得更高的产量、WPc 和 AEP,并最大限度地提高经济收益。此外,育种者还需要培育出更能抵抗水分胁迫、更能有效吸收钾的大豆品种。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Agricultural Water Management
Agricultural Water Management 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
12.10
自引率
14.90%
发文量
648
审稿时长
4.9 months
期刊介绍: Agricultural Water Management publishes papers of international significance relating to the science, economics, and policy of agricultural water management. In all cases, manuscripts must address implications and provide insight regarding agricultural water management.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信