Advanced landslide susceptibility mapping and analysis of driving mechanisms using ensemble machine learning models

IF 1.7 4区 地球科学 Q3 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Mashael Maashi , Nada Alzaben , Noha Negm , V. Venkatesan , S. Sabarunisha Begum , P. Geetha
{"title":"Advanced landslide susceptibility mapping and analysis of driving mechanisms using ensemble machine learning models","authors":"Mashael Maashi ,&nbsp;Nada Alzaben ,&nbsp;Noha Negm ,&nbsp;V. Venkatesan ,&nbsp;S. Sabarunisha Begum ,&nbsp;P. Geetha","doi":"10.1016/j.jsames.2024.105272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study focuses on advanced landslide susceptibility mapping in Bertioga, utilizing ensemble machine-learning models to identify and predict landslide-prone regions. Four algorithms—Adaptive Boosting (AdaBoost), Gradient-Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT), Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), and Random Forest (RF)—were employed to model landslide susceptibility at a 30-m spatial scale, using thirteen landslide conditioning factors (LCFs). These LCFs include topographical, geological, and environmental variables significantly influencing landslide occurrence. The performance of each model was evaluated based on precision (P), recall (R), F1-Score, and area under the curve (AUC), ensuring a robust assessment of prediction accuracy. Furthermore, the models demonstrated varying area coverage in terms of susceptibility classes. For instance, MLP identified 15% of the study area as very low susceptibility, 22% as low, 18% as moderate, 18% as high, and 27% as very high. RF predicted 40% of the region as very low susceptibility, whereas GBDT indicated a substantial 45% of the area as very high risk. AdaBoost, on the other hand, assigned the highest moderate risk coverage at 31%. These results provide a comprehensive understanding of the spatial distribution of landslide risks. Results show that MLP and GBDT achieved higher accuracies in the susceptibility mapping, with AUC values ranging from 0.85 to 0.96. For instance, in Parque CauiBura, MLP and GBDT performed exceptionally well with AUC scores of 0.98 and 0.97, respectively. The average prediction for all cities yielded a high accuracy of 0.95 in Parque CauiBura, followed by 0.92 in Centro. These findings highlight the importance of using ensemble machine learning techniques in regional landslide susceptibility mapping, offering valuable insights for risk management and mitigation strategies in landslide-prone areas such as Bertioga.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50047,"journal":{"name":"Journal of South American Earth Sciences","volume":"151 ","pages":"Article 105272"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of South American Earth Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0895981124004942","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study focuses on advanced landslide susceptibility mapping in Bertioga, utilizing ensemble machine-learning models to identify and predict landslide-prone regions. Four algorithms—Adaptive Boosting (AdaBoost), Gradient-Boosting Decision Tree (GBDT), Multilayer Perceptron (MLP), and Random Forest (RF)—were employed to model landslide susceptibility at a 30-m spatial scale, using thirteen landslide conditioning factors (LCFs). These LCFs include topographical, geological, and environmental variables significantly influencing landslide occurrence. The performance of each model was evaluated based on precision (P), recall (R), F1-Score, and area under the curve (AUC), ensuring a robust assessment of prediction accuracy. Furthermore, the models demonstrated varying area coverage in terms of susceptibility classes. For instance, MLP identified 15% of the study area as very low susceptibility, 22% as low, 18% as moderate, 18% as high, and 27% as very high. RF predicted 40% of the region as very low susceptibility, whereas GBDT indicated a substantial 45% of the area as very high risk. AdaBoost, on the other hand, assigned the highest moderate risk coverage at 31%. These results provide a comprehensive understanding of the spatial distribution of landslide risks. Results show that MLP and GBDT achieved higher accuracies in the susceptibility mapping, with AUC values ranging from 0.85 to 0.96. For instance, in Parque CauiBura, MLP and GBDT performed exceptionally well with AUC scores of 0.98 and 0.97, respectively. The average prediction for all cities yielded a high accuracy of 0.95 in Parque CauiBura, followed by 0.92 in Centro. These findings highlight the importance of using ensemble machine learning techniques in regional landslide susceptibility mapping, offering valuable insights for risk management and mitigation strategies in landslide-prone areas such as Bertioga.
利用集合机器学习模型绘制高级滑坡易发性地图并分析驱动机制
本研究的重点是在贝尔蒂奥加绘制先进的滑坡易发性地图,利用集合机器学习模型来识别和预测滑坡易发区域。研究采用了四种算法--自适应提升(AdaBoost)、梯度提升决策树(GBDT)、多层感知器(MLP)和随机森林(RF),利用 13 个滑坡条件因子(LCF)在 30 米的空间范围内建立滑坡易发性模型。这些 LCF 包括对滑坡发生有重大影响的地形、地质和环境变量。根据精确度(P)、召回率(R)、F1-分数和曲线下面积(AUC)对每个模型的性能进行了评估,确保对预测准确性进行稳健的评估。此外,这些模型在易感性类别方面显示出不同的区域覆盖率。例如,MLP 将 15%的研究区域确定为极低易感性区域,22%为低易感性区域,18%为中等易感性区域,18%为高易感性区域,27%为极高易感性区域。RF 预测 40% 的区域为极低易感性,而 GBDT 则显示 45% 的区域为极高风险。另一方面,AdaBoost 预测的中度风险覆盖率最高,为 31%。这些结果提供了对滑坡风险空间分布的全面了解。结果表明,MLP 和 GBDT 在绘制易感性地图方面取得了更高的准确度,AUC 值在 0.85 到 0.96 之间。例如,在 CauiBura 公园,MLP 和 GBDT 的 AUC 值分别为 0.98 和 0.97,表现优异。在 Parque CauiBura,所有城市的平均预测准确率高达 0.95,其次是 Centro,为 0.92。这些发现凸显了在绘制区域滑坡易发性地图时使用集合机器学习技术的重要性,为贝尔蒂奥加等滑坡易发地区的风险管理和减灾战略提供了宝贵的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of South American Earth Sciences
Journal of South American Earth Sciences 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
22.20%
发文量
364
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Papers must have a regional appeal and should present work of more than local significance. Research papers dealing with the regional geology of South American cratons and mobile belts, within the following research fields: -Economic geology, metallogenesis and hydrocarbon genesis and reservoirs. -Geophysics, geochemistry, volcanology, igneous and metamorphic petrology. -Tectonics, neo- and seismotectonics and geodynamic modeling. -Geomorphology, geological hazards, environmental geology, climate change in America and Antarctica, and soil research. -Stratigraphy, sedimentology, structure and basin evolution. -Paleontology, paleoecology, paleoclimatology and Quaternary geology. New developments in already established regional projects and new initiatives dealing with the geology of the continent will be summarized and presented on a regular basis. Short notes, discussions, book reviews and conference and workshop reports will also be included when relevant.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信