Evaluation of the elastic modulus improvement in geocell-reinforced unbound aggregates: Full-scale experimental sections on a highway

IF 4.9 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
L.X. Feng , J.O. Avesani Neto , J.G. Zornberg
{"title":"Evaluation of the elastic modulus improvement in geocell-reinforced unbound aggregates: Full-scale experimental sections on a highway","authors":"L.X. Feng ,&nbsp;J.O. Avesani Neto ,&nbsp;J.G. Zornberg","doi":"10.1016/j.trgeo.2024.101444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This article presents back analyzed results from experimental full-scale field test zones involving unreinforced and geocell-reinforced layers with unbound aggregate infill subjected to in-situ Benkelman Beam test (BBT). The field tests were conducted on experimental test zones during the construction of a new highway. Two types of Unbound Granular Materials (UGM), placed on layers of various thicknesses, were employed in unreinforced and geocell-reinforced pavement zones. Deflection measurements were collected for the different pavement structure layers using the BBT. The main objectives of the testing program were (1) to back calculate the elastic moduli on all test zones in both unreinforced and reinforced layers; (2) to determine the improvement in elastic modulus of the UGM, as quantified by the Modulus Improvement Factor (MIF), which results from geocell reinforcement; (3) to compare the measured MIF with MIF values reported in the literature under similar conditions; and (4) to evaluate the accuracy of available analytical methods to estimate the MIF. The results demonstrated a significant improvement in the elastic modulus of the UGM using geocell reinforcement, with MIF values ranging from 2.6 to 3.3, depending on the fill material. One analytical method used to calculate MIF values was found to have good predictive capability, confirming its potential to the design of pavements with geocell-reinforced layers.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":56013,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Geotechnics","volume":"49 ","pages":"Article 101444"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Geotechnics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214391224002654","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article presents back analyzed results from experimental full-scale field test zones involving unreinforced and geocell-reinforced layers with unbound aggregate infill subjected to in-situ Benkelman Beam test (BBT). The field tests were conducted on experimental test zones during the construction of a new highway. Two types of Unbound Granular Materials (UGM), placed on layers of various thicknesses, were employed in unreinforced and geocell-reinforced pavement zones. Deflection measurements were collected for the different pavement structure layers using the BBT. The main objectives of the testing program were (1) to back calculate the elastic moduli on all test zones in both unreinforced and reinforced layers; (2) to determine the improvement in elastic modulus of the UGM, as quantified by the Modulus Improvement Factor (MIF), which results from geocell reinforcement; (3) to compare the measured MIF with MIF values reported in the literature under similar conditions; and (4) to evaluate the accuracy of available analytical methods to estimate the MIF. The results demonstrated a significant improvement in the elastic modulus of the UGM using geocell reinforcement, with MIF values ranging from 2.6 to 3.3, depending on the fill material. One analytical method used to calculate MIF values was found to have good predictive capability, confirming its potential to the design of pavements with geocell-reinforced layers.
评估土工格室加固非约束集料的弹性模量改善情况:高速公路上的全尺寸实验路段
本文介绍了对未加固层和土工凝胶加固层进行原位本克尔曼梁试验(BBT)的全尺寸现场试验区的结果进行的回溯分析。现场测试是在一条新高速公路的施工过程中在实验测试区进行的。在非加固路面区和土工格室加固路面区使用了两种类型的无粘结颗粒材料(UGM),分别置于不同厚度的层上。使用 BBT 收集了不同路面结构层的挠度测量数据。测试程序的主要目标是:(1)反向计算所有测试区未加固层和加固层的弹性模量;(2)确定土工格室加固对 UGM 弹性模量的改善,以模量改善系数 (MIF) 量化;(3)将测得的 MIF 与文献中报道的类似条件下的 MIF 值进行比较;以及(4)评估可用来估算 MIF 的分析方法的准确性。结果表明,使用土工格室加固 UGM 的弹性模量有了明显改善,MIF 值从 2.6 到 3.3 不等,具体取决于填充材料。用于计算 MIF 值的一种分析方法具有良好的预测能力,证实了其在设计土工格室加固层路面方面的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Transportation Geotechnics
Transportation Geotechnics Social Sciences-Transportation
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
11.30%
发文量
194
审稿时长
51 days
期刊介绍: Transportation Geotechnics is a journal dedicated to publishing high-quality, theoretical, and applied papers that cover all facets of geotechnics for transportation infrastructure such as roads, highways, railways, underground railways, airfields, and waterways. The journal places a special emphasis on case studies that present original work relevant to the sustainable construction of transportation infrastructure. The scope of topics it addresses includes the geotechnical properties of geomaterials for sustainable and rational design and construction, the behavior of compacted and stabilized geomaterials, the use of geosynthetics and reinforcement in constructed layers and interlayers, ground improvement and slope stability for transportation infrastructures, compaction technology and management, maintenance technology, the impact of climate, embankments for highways and high-speed trains, transition zones, dredging, underwater geotechnics for infrastructure purposes, and the modeling of multi-layered structures and supporting ground under dynamic and repeated loads.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信