Assessing progress toward sustainable development in China and its impact on human well-being

IF 9.8 1区 社会学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Chaoyue Yu, Wencang Shen, Zhengfeng Zhang
{"title":"Assessing progress toward sustainable development in China and its impact on human well-being","authors":"Chaoyue Yu,&nbsp;Wencang Shen,&nbsp;Zhengfeng Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.eiar.2024.107729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The rising call for prioritizing specific sustainable development goals (SDGs) over holistic SDG achievement may worsen development imbalances and limit the enhancement of human well-being. It is essential to assess the progress and evenness of SDGs across time and space, as well as their impact on human well-being. Here, we assessed 16 SDGs for 31 provinces in China over the period 2000–2020, evaluated the SDG index (SDGI) and SDG evenness (SDGE), and explored the impact of SDGE and GDP on human well-being in terms of basic needs, security needs, and spiritual needs. Our findings indicate improvements in both SDGI and SDGE at the national and provincial levels. Most provinces witnessed progress across the majority of SDGs, except SDG 10 (reduced inequalities) and SDG 12 (responsible consumption and production). Over the past two decades, eastern China consistently exhibited a higher SDGI compared to western China. However, the region demonstrating the best SDGE performance gradually shifted from the eastern coastal region to northern China. SDGs 1 (no poverty), 3 (good health and well-being), 8 (decent work and economic growth), and 16 (peace, justice, and strong institutions) made significant contributions to the enhancement of SDGI and SDGE. Furthermore, economic development and the improvement of SDGE significantly influenced human well-being, albeit with some variations. Both of them positively affected health but also exacerbated environmental challenges. For gender equality, SDGE had a positive impact, while GDP had a negative influence. To achieve sustainable development, it is imperative to promote the decoupling of development from resource consumption and environmental pollution. Additionally, comprehensive measures should be implemented to enhance the equity and inclusiveness of economic development outcomes. This study contributes to the comprehensive achievement of the SDGs and serves as a valuable reference for assessing sustainable development paths and optimizing development patterns globally.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":309,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","volume":"110 ","pages":"Article 107729"},"PeriodicalIF":9.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Impact Assessment Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0195925524003160","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rising call for prioritizing specific sustainable development goals (SDGs) over holistic SDG achievement may worsen development imbalances and limit the enhancement of human well-being. It is essential to assess the progress and evenness of SDGs across time and space, as well as their impact on human well-being. Here, we assessed 16 SDGs for 31 provinces in China over the period 2000–2020, evaluated the SDG index (SDGI) and SDG evenness (SDGE), and explored the impact of SDGE and GDP on human well-being in terms of basic needs, security needs, and spiritual needs. Our findings indicate improvements in both SDGI and SDGE at the national and provincial levels. Most provinces witnessed progress across the majority of SDGs, except SDG 10 (reduced inequalities) and SDG 12 (responsible consumption and production). Over the past two decades, eastern China consistently exhibited a higher SDGI compared to western China. However, the region demonstrating the best SDGE performance gradually shifted from the eastern coastal region to northern China. SDGs 1 (no poverty), 3 (good health and well-being), 8 (decent work and economic growth), and 16 (peace, justice, and strong institutions) made significant contributions to the enhancement of SDGI and SDGE. Furthermore, economic development and the improvement of SDGE significantly influenced human well-being, albeit with some variations. Both of them positively affected health but also exacerbated environmental challenges. For gender equality, SDGE had a positive impact, while GDP had a negative influence. To achieve sustainable development, it is imperative to promote the decoupling of development from resource consumption and environmental pollution. Additionally, comprehensive measures should be implemented to enhance the equity and inclusiveness of economic development outcomes. This study contributes to the comprehensive achievement of the SDGs and serves as a valuable reference for assessing sustainable development paths and optimizing development patterns globally.

Abstract Image

评估中国可持续发展的进展及其对人类福祉的影响
将具体的可持续发展目标(SDGs)置于全面实现可持续发展目标之上的呼声日益高涨,这可能会加剧发展的不平衡,限制人类福祉的提高。评估可持续发展目标在不同时间和空间的进展和均衡性及其对人类福祉的影响至关重要。在此,我们评估了 2000-2020 年间中国 31 个省份的 16 项可持续发展目标,评价了可持续发展目标指数(SDGI)和可持续发展目标均衡度(SDGE),并从基本需求、安全需求和精神需求三个方面探讨了可持续发展目标均衡度和 GDP 对人类福祉的影响。我们的研究结果表明,在国家和省级层面,SDGI 和 SDGE 都有所改善。除可持续发展目标 10(减少不平等)和可持续发展目标 12(负责任的消费和生产)外,大多数省份在大多数可持续发展目标方面都取得了进展。在过去二十年中,中国东部地区的可持续发展目标指数一直高于西部地区。然而,SDGE 表现最好的地区逐渐从东部沿海地区转移到中国北部。可持续发展目标 1(消除贫困)、3(良好的健康和福祉)、8(体面工作和经济增长)和 16(和平、公正和强有力的机构)为提高 SDGI 和 SDGE 做出了重要贡献。此外,经济发展和改善可持续发展教育和性别平等也对人类福祉产生了重大影响,尽管存在一些差异。两者都对健康产生了积极影响,但也加剧了环境挑战。在性别平等方面,可持续发展教育对性别平等有积极影响,而国内生产总值则有消极影响。要实现可持续发展,必须促进发展与资源消耗和环境污染脱钩。此外,还应采取综合措施,提高经济发展成果的公平性和包容性。本研究有助于全面实现可持续发展目标,对评估可持续发展路径和优化全球发展模式具有重要参考价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
10.10%
发文量
200
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Impact Assessment Review is an interdisciplinary journal that serves a global audience of practitioners, policymakers, and academics involved in assessing the environmental impact of policies, projects, processes, and products. The journal focuses on innovative theory and practice in environmental impact assessment (EIA). Papers are expected to present innovative ideas, be topical, and coherent. The journal emphasizes concepts, methods, techniques, approaches, and systems related to EIA theory and practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信