Blockchain’s role in operation strategy of power battery closed-loop supply chain

IF 6.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Jing Jia , Weida Chen , Zheng Wang , Ligang Shi , Shuaishuai Fu
{"title":"Blockchain’s role in operation strategy of power battery closed-loop supply chain","authors":"Jing Jia ,&nbsp;Weida Chen ,&nbsp;Zheng Wang ,&nbsp;Ligang Shi ,&nbsp;Shuaishuai Fu","doi":"10.1016/j.cie.2024.110742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>With the rapid development of the electric vehicle industry, the issue of recycling retired power batteries is becoming increasingly prominent. Considering the adoption of blockchain technology to enhance information traceability for retired power batteries, we construct three closed-loop supply chain decision-making models: a supply chain that does not adopt blockchain technology, a manufacturing enterprise that independently bears the input cost of blockchain technology, and a scenario which both manufacturing and selling enterprises jointly bear the blockchain technology input costs. Through the comparative analysis of the equilibrium solutions of these models, including the profits of each supply chain member, consumer surplus, environmental impact, and social welfare, it is concluded that the level of information traceability increases with the increase of the blockchain technology input cost-sharing ratio <em>λ</em> by the selling enterprise. However, there is a threshold for <em>λ</em> and <em>λ</em> cannot be infinitely increased. The profits of both manufacturing and selling enterprises increase with the adoption of blockchain technology, yet the ladder-utilizing enterprise achieves the highest profits when not adopting blockchain technology. Furthermore, the adoption of blockchain technology can increase consumer surplus and social welfare while reducing the impact on the environment. These studies provide theoretical guidance on both economic and social environment for the operation decision of each member in the closed-loop supply chain of power batteries.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55220,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Industrial Engineering","volume":"198 ","pages":"Article 110742"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Industrial Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360835224008647","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the rapid development of the electric vehicle industry, the issue of recycling retired power batteries is becoming increasingly prominent. Considering the adoption of blockchain technology to enhance information traceability for retired power batteries, we construct three closed-loop supply chain decision-making models: a supply chain that does not adopt blockchain technology, a manufacturing enterprise that independently bears the input cost of blockchain technology, and a scenario which both manufacturing and selling enterprises jointly bear the blockchain technology input costs. Through the comparative analysis of the equilibrium solutions of these models, including the profits of each supply chain member, consumer surplus, environmental impact, and social welfare, it is concluded that the level of information traceability increases with the increase of the blockchain technology input cost-sharing ratio λ by the selling enterprise. However, there is a threshold for λ and λ cannot be infinitely increased. The profits of both manufacturing and selling enterprises increase with the adoption of blockchain technology, yet the ladder-utilizing enterprise achieves the highest profits when not adopting blockchain technology. Furthermore, the adoption of blockchain technology can increase consumer surplus and social welfare while reducing the impact on the environment. These studies provide theoretical guidance on both economic and social environment for the operation decision of each member in the closed-loop supply chain of power batteries.
区块链在动力电池闭环供应链运营战略中的作用
随着电动汽车产业的快速发展,报废动力电池的回收问题日益突出。考虑到采用区块链技术加强报废动力电池的信息溯源,我们构建了三种闭环供应链决策模型:不采用区块链技术的供应链、独立承担区块链技术投入成本的生产企业、生产企业和销售企业共同承担区块链技术投入成本的情景。通过对这些模型的均衡解,包括供应链各成员的利润、消费者剩余、环境影响、社会福利等进行比较分析,得出结论:信息溯源水平随着销售企业对区块链技术投入成本分担比例λ的增加而提高。但是,λ存在一个临界值,λ不能无限提高。生产企业和销售企业的利润都会随着区块链技术的采用而增加,但阶梯使用企业在不采用区块链技术时获得的利润最高。此外,采用区块链技术可以增加消费者剩余和社会福利,同时减少对环境的影响。这些研究为动力电池闭环供应链中各成员的经营决策提供了经济环境和社会环境两方面的理论指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Computers & Industrial Engineering
Computers & Industrial Engineering 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
12.70%
发文量
794
审稿时长
10.6 months
期刊介绍: Computers & Industrial Engineering (CAIE) is dedicated to researchers, educators, and practitioners in industrial engineering and related fields. Pioneering the integration of computers in research, education, and practice, industrial engineering has evolved to make computers and electronic communication integral to its domain. CAIE publishes original contributions focusing on the development of novel computerized methodologies to address industrial engineering problems. It also highlights the applications of these methodologies to issues within the broader industrial engineering and associated communities. The journal actively encourages submissions that push the boundaries of fundamental theories and concepts in industrial engineering techniques.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信