Enhancing waste management in batang regency: Integrating circular economy principles with life cycle assessment and material flow analysis

Q1 Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Syafrudin , Mochamad Arief Budihardjo , Indah Fajarini Sri Wahyuningrum , Amin Chegenizadeh , Annisa Sila Puspita , Syahrul Al Qadar
{"title":"Enhancing waste management in batang regency: Integrating circular economy principles with life cycle assessment and material flow analysis","authors":"Syafrudin ,&nbsp;Mochamad Arief Budihardjo ,&nbsp;Indah Fajarini Sri Wahyuningrum ,&nbsp;Amin Chegenizadeh ,&nbsp;Annisa Sila Puspita ,&nbsp;Syahrul Al Qadar","doi":"10.1016/j.joitmc.2024.100437","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Batang Regency encountered persistent waste management challenges, requiring effective mitigation strategies. This study evaluated residential waste management utilizing life cycle assessment (LCA) and material flow analysis (MFA) to propose sustainable plans. Three scenarios were compared: the current conditions (Scenario 1) had the highest environmental impact. In contrast, Scenarios 2 and 3, which included sorting and recycling processes, demonstrated improved energy and product recovery, making them more sustainable. The results indicated that Scenario 1 had a global warming potential (GWP) of up to 1.65E+04 CO<sub>2</sub> eq/t MSW, Scenario 2 had up to 2.88E+03 CO<sub>2</sub> eq/t MSW, and Scenario 3 had up to 3.08E+03 03 CO<sub>2</sub> eq/t MSW. Scenario 2 exhibited a lower GWP than Scenario 1, while Scenario 3, although higher in GWP, was recommended for excluding landfills. These findings highlighted the potential for waste sorting improvements and adjustments to classified waste treatment with environmental regulations, supporting sustainability in Batang Regency's waste management.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":16678,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity","volume":"10 4","pages":"Article 100437"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2199853124002312","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Batang Regency encountered persistent waste management challenges, requiring effective mitigation strategies. This study evaluated residential waste management utilizing life cycle assessment (LCA) and material flow analysis (MFA) to propose sustainable plans. Three scenarios were compared: the current conditions (Scenario 1) had the highest environmental impact. In contrast, Scenarios 2 and 3, which included sorting and recycling processes, demonstrated improved energy and product recovery, making them more sustainable. The results indicated that Scenario 1 had a global warming potential (GWP) of up to 1.65E+04 CO2 eq/t MSW, Scenario 2 had up to 2.88E+03 CO2 eq/t MSW, and Scenario 3 had up to 3.08E+03 03 CO2 eq/t MSW. Scenario 2 exhibited a lower GWP than Scenario 1, while Scenario 3, although higher in GWP, was recommended for excluding landfills. These findings highlighted the potential for waste sorting improvements and adjustments to classified waste treatment with environmental regulations, supporting sustainability in Batang Regency's waste management.
加强巴塘县的废物管理:将循环经济原则与生命周期评估和物料流分析相结合
巴塘县(Batang Regency)面临着持续的废物管理挑战,需要有效的缓解策略。本研究利用生命周期评估(LCA)和物质流分析(MFA)对住宅废物管理进行了评估,以提出可持续发展计划。对三种方案进行了比较:当前状况(方案 1)对环境的影响最大。相比之下,方案 2 和方案 3(包括分类和回收流程)在能源和产品回收方面有所改善,更具可持续性。结果表明,方案 1 的全球升温潜能值(GWP)高达 1.65E+04 CO2 当量/吨 MSW,方案 2 高达 2.88E+03 CO2 当量/吨 MSW,方案 3 高达 3.08E+03 03 CO2 当量/吨 MSW。方案 2 的全球升温潜能值低于方案 1,而方案 3 虽然全球升温潜能值较高,但建议将其排除在垃圾填埋场之外。这些发现凸显了改进废物分类和调整废物分类处理以符合环境法规的潜力,从而支持巴塘县废物管理的可持续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity
Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
11.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
196
审稿时长
1 day
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信