Entrepreneurial bricolage: A systematic literature network analysis and TCCM approach

IF 2.7 Q2 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Brahim Aaouid , Abdellah Elboussadi , Omar Boubker , Zakaria Nejjari
{"title":"Entrepreneurial bricolage: A systematic literature network analysis and TCCM approach","authors":"Brahim Aaouid ,&nbsp;Abdellah Elboussadi ,&nbsp;Omar Boubker ,&nbsp;Zakaria Nejjari","doi":"10.1016/j.sciaf.2024.e02474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In recent years, bricolage, often considered an alternative approach to traditional methods of entrepreneurial action, has attracted increasing interest from researchers. This article aims to provide an in-depth overview of the current state of bricolage research and to illuminate the historical development of knowledge in this area. To achieve this objective, we analyzed the literature by adopting the SLNA (Systematic Literature Network Analysis) methodology which combines the systematic review approach with bibliographic network analysis. To enrich this analysis, we also integrated the TCCM approach, which evaluates the literature from the angles of Theory (T), Context (C), Characteristics (C), and Methodology (M). This combination provides an integrated and comprehensive view of the current literature on entrepreneurial bricolage, thereby facilitating an in-depth and structured understanding of this research area. The results of this analysis show that research on bricolage is fragmented across several strands of research, producing a great wealth of knowledge on this entrepreneurial approach. Furthermore, this study identifies existing gaps in the literature and offers a roadmap to guide future research on entrepreneurial bricolage.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":21690,"journal":{"name":"Scientific African","volume":"26 ","pages":"Article e02474"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific African","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468227624004162","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, bricolage, often considered an alternative approach to traditional methods of entrepreneurial action, has attracted increasing interest from researchers. This article aims to provide an in-depth overview of the current state of bricolage research and to illuminate the historical development of knowledge in this area. To achieve this objective, we analyzed the literature by adopting the SLNA (Systematic Literature Network Analysis) methodology which combines the systematic review approach with bibliographic network analysis. To enrich this analysis, we also integrated the TCCM approach, which evaluates the literature from the angles of Theory (T), Context (C), Characteristics (C), and Methodology (M). This combination provides an integrated and comprehensive view of the current literature on entrepreneurial bricolage, thereby facilitating an in-depth and structured understanding of this research area. The results of this analysis show that research on bricolage is fragmented across several strands of research, producing a great wealth of knowledge on this entrepreneurial approach. Furthermore, this study identifies existing gaps in the literature and offers a roadmap to guide future research on entrepreneurial bricolage.
创业 "嬉戏":系统文献网络分析和 TCCM 方法
近年来,"双创 "这一通常被视为传统创业行动方法之外的另一种方法,吸引了越来越多研究人员的关注。本文旨在深入概述双创研究的现状,并阐明该领域知识的历史发展。为实现这一目标,我们采用了 SLNA(系统文献网络分析)方法对文献进行了分析,该方法结合了系统综述法和书目网络分析法。为了丰富这一分析,我们还结合了 TCCM 方法,即从理论(T)、背景(C)、特征(C)和方法(M)的角度对文献进行评估。这样的组合提供了一个综合全面的视角来看待当前有关创业 "双创 "的文献,从而促进了对这一研究领域的深入和结构化理解。分析结果表明,有关 "双创 "的研究分散在多个研究领域,产生了大量有关这种创业方式的知识。此外,本研究还发现了文献中的现有空白,并为指导未来的创业 "双创 "研究提供了路线图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Scientific African
Scientific African Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
332
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信