In vitro cyto- and geno-toxicity of asbestiform erionite from New Zealand

IF 7.7 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Sonia Scarfì , Vanessa Almonti , Serena Mirata , Mario Passalacqua , Stefania Vernazza , Janki Prakash Patel , Martin Brook , Ayrton Hamilton , Melanie Kah , Alessandro F. Gualtieri
{"title":"In vitro cyto- and geno-toxicity of asbestiform erionite from New Zealand","authors":"Sonia Scarfì ,&nbsp;Vanessa Almonti ,&nbsp;Serena Mirata ,&nbsp;Mario Passalacqua ,&nbsp;Stefania Vernazza ,&nbsp;Janki Prakash Patel ,&nbsp;Martin Brook ,&nbsp;Ayrton Hamilton ,&nbsp;Melanie Kah ,&nbsp;Alessandro F. Gualtieri","doi":"10.1016/j.envres.2024.120415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This work is an <em>in vitro</em> toxicity study of two asbestiform erionites from Kaipara and Gawler Downs in New Zealand. This study is the first, to the knowledge of the authors, to investigate the mechanisms that trigger adverse effects leading to carcinogenicity from New Zealand erionites. The effects induced by the erionite fibres from New Zealand were compared with those produced by positive (crocidolite) and negative (wollastonite) standards, and other erionite fibres described in the literature. The cytotoxicity/genotoxicity/inflammatory potential was determined by: (i) analysis of the cytotoxic potential by MTT tests on human cell lines mimicking primary cells making direct contact with fibres in the lungs, combined with apoptosis tests and cell membrane damage by fluorescence microscopy analyses; (ii) analysis of the genotoxic potential by quantification of DNA damage measuring double strand break foci by γ-H2AX nuclear staining in confocal microscopy analyses; (iii) analyses of the acute (24–72h) and early-chronic (7d) inflammatory effect by gene expression analyses of several cytokines, as well as of fibrotic and Epithelial to Mesenchymal transition (EMT) markers. The intensity of cell responses to these erionites are comparable to that of standard carcinogenic crocidolite, indicating that the two erionite fibres exhibit a significant acute toxic potential, with a particular alarming effect from the Gawler Downs sample from South Island. Our results confirm that the investigated erionites from New Zealand may represent an environmental hazard. However, further investigation is required to determine potential environmental exposure pathways by which erionite may become airborne and assess any environmental risks that may arise.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":312,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Research","volume":"265 ","pages":"Article 120415"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Research","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0013935124023223","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This work is an in vitro toxicity study of two asbestiform erionites from Kaipara and Gawler Downs in New Zealand. This study is the first, to the knowledge of the authors, to investigate the mechanisms that trigger adverse effects leading to carcinogenicity from New Zealand erionites. The effects induced by the erionite fibres from New Zealand were compared with those produced by positive (crocidolite) and negative (wollastonite) standards, and other erionite fibres described in the literature. The cytotoxicity/genotoxicity/inflammatory potential was determined by: (i) analysis of the cytotoxic potential by MTT tests on human cell lines mimicking primary cells making direct contact with fibres in the lungs, combined with apoptosis tests and cell membrane damage by fluorescence microscopy analyses; (ii) analysis of the genotoxic potential by quantification of DNA damage measuring double strand break foci by γ-H2AX nuclear staining in confocal microscopy analyses; (iii) analyses of the acute (24–72h) and early-chronic (7d) inflammatory effect by gene expression analyses of several cytokines, as well as of fibrotic and Epithelial to Mesenchymal transition (EMT) markers. The intensity of cell responses to these erionites are comparable to that of standard carcinogenic crocidolite, indicating that the two erionite fibres exhibit a significant acute toxic potential, with a particular alarming effect from the Gawler Downs sample from South Island. Our results confirm that the investigated erionites from New Zealand may represent an environmental hazard. However, further investigation is required to determine potential environmental exposure pathways by which erionite may become airborne and assess any environmental risks that may arise.
新西兰石棉状二沸石的体外细胞毒性和基因毒性。
这项研究是对新西兰凯帕拉(Kaipara)和高勒唐斯(Gawler Downs)的两种石棉状电离石进行的体外毒性研究。据作者所知,这项研究是首次调查新西兰电离石引发致癌不良效应的机制。研究人员将新西兰麦饭石纤维所产生的影响与阳性(青石棉)和阴性(硅灰石)标准以及文献中描述的其他麦饭石纤维所产生的影响进行了比较。细胞毒性/遗传毒性/炎症潜力是通过以下方法确定的:(i) 通过 MTT 试验分析细胞毒性潜力,试验对象是模拟与肺部纤维直接接触的原代细胞的人体细胞系,同时进行细胞凋亡试验,并通过荧光显微镜分析细胞膜损伤情况;(ii) 通过共聚焦显微镜分析中的γ-H2AX 核染色对 DNA 损伤进行量化,测量双股断裂灶,从而分析遗传毒性潜力;(iii) 通过对几种细胞因子以及纤维化和上皮细胞向间质转化(EMT)标志物的基因表达分析,分析急性(24-72 小时)和早期慢性(7 天)炎症效应。细胞对这些麦饭石的反应强度与标准致癌青石棉相当,这表明这两种麦饭石纤维具有明显的急性毒性潜能,南岛高勒唐斯(Gawler Downs)样本的影响尤其令人担忧。我们的研究结果证实,所调查的新西兰麦饭石可能会对环境造成危害。不过,还需要进一步调查,以确定空气中可能存在的潜在环境接触途径,并评估可能出现的环境风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Research
Environmental Research 环境科学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
8.40%
发文量
2480
审稿时长
4.7 months
期刊介绍: The Environmental Research journal presents a broad range of interdisciplinary research, focused on addressing worldwide environmental concerns and featuring innovative findings. Our publication strives to explore relevant anthropogenic issues across various environmental sectors, showcasing practical applications in real-life settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信