Radiographic Assessment of Total Knee Arthroplasty Alignment with and without Accelerometer-Based Navigation at a Resident Training Institution.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS
Brett G Brazier, Christian Bryce Allen, Daryl Hillyard, Darshan Shah, David Vizurraga, Donald Hope
{"title":"Radiographic Assessment of Total Knee Arthroplasty Alignment with and without Accelerometer-Based Navigation at a Resident Training Institution.","authors":"Brett G Brazier, Christian Bryce Allen, Daryl Hillyard, Darshan Shah, David Vizurraga, Donald Hope","doi":"10.1055/a-2481-8647","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Malalignment and lack of surgeon experience are cited as risk factors for prosthetic failure and the need for subsequent revision surgery in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Various Conventional (CON) and Computer Assisted Surgical (CAS) methods have been developed to try and prevent malalignment and limit outliers. One of these methods is through an accelerometer-based CAS (aCAS) which intra-operatively helps determine the angulation and amount of resection necessary to restore alignment in TKA. The purpose of this study was to determine the number of TKA alignment outliers in TKA's performed both with CON and aCAS methods at a single training institution in cases that trainees were involved in.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this retrospective single center study, radiographic analysis of 150 primary TKAs performed at our training institution was performed. The medial distal femoral angle (DFA), medial proximal tibial angle (PTA), and posterior slope angle (PSA) were evaluated on immediate post-operative radiographs of 75 aCAS and 75 CON knees. Outlier measurements were defined as DFA outside of 5° ±3° valgus; PTA >±3° from neutral axis; and PSA outside 0-7° for Cruciate Retaining (CR) and 0-5° for Posterior Stabilized (PS) implants. Data was analyzed using chi-squared, ANOVA and Student's t-tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was no significant difference found between these two groups in the total number of outliers (8% aCAS versus 9.8% CON, p=0.508). Additionally, there was also no significant difference found for any of the radiographic measurements independently; DFA (8% versus 8%, p=1.00), PTA (4% versus 9%, p=0.184), and PSA (12% versus 12%, p=1.00), when comparing aCAS and CON TKA's.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Primary TKAs performed at a single training institution demonstrated no significant difference between aCAS and CON methods in the total number of outliers or in the number of outliers for each postoperative radiographic measurement. This study would suggest that there is no advantage in limiting outliers when utilizing aCAS for TKAs at training institutions in cases that trainees are involved in.</p>","PeriodicalId":48798,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Knee Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Knee Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2481-8647","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Malalignment and lack of surgeon experience are cited as risk factors for prosthetic failure and the need for subsequent revision surgery in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Various Conventional (CON) and Computer Assisted Surgical (CAS) methods have been developed to try and prevent malalignment and limit outliers. One of these methods is through an accelerometer-based CAS (aCAS) which intra-operatively helps determine the angulation and amount of resection necessary to restore alignment in TKA. The purpose of this study was to determine the number of TKA alignment outliers in TKA's performed both with CON and aCAS methods at a single training institution in cases that trainees were involved in.

Methods: In this retrospective single center study, radiographic analysis of 150 primary TKAs performed at our training institution was performed. The medial distal femoral angle (DFA), medial proximal tibial angle (PTA), and posterior slope angle (PSA) were evaluated on immediate post-operative radiographs of 75 aCAS and 75 CON knees. Outlier measurements were defined as DFA outside of 5° ±3° valgus; PTA >±3° from neutral axis; and PSA outside 0-7° for Cruciate Retaining (CR) and 0-5° for Posterior Stabilized (PS) implants. Data was analyzed using chi-squared, ANOVA and Student's t-tests.

Results: There was no significant difference found between these two groups in the total number of outliers (8% aCAS versus 9.8% CON, p=0.508). Additionally, there was also no significant difference found for any of the radiographic measurements independently; DFA (8% versus 8%, p=1.00), PTA (4% versus 9%, p=0.184), and PSA (12% versus 12%, p=1.00), when comparing aCAS and CON TKA's.

Conclusions: Primary TKAs performed at a single training institution demonstrated no significant difference between aCAS and CON methods in the total number of outliers or in the number of outliers for each postoperative radiographic measurement. This study would suggest that there is no advantage in limiting outliers when utilizing aCAS for TKAs at training institutions in cases that trainees are involved in.

一家住院医师培训机构在使用和未使用加速度计导航的情况下对全膝关节置换术的对位情况进行放射学评估。
导言:在全膝关节置换术(TKA)中,错位和外科医生经验不足被认为是导致假体失败和需要进行后续翻修手术的风险因素。目前已开发出各种常规(CON)和计算机辅助手术(CAS)方法,试图防止对位不当和限制异常值。其中一种方法是通过基于加速度计的 CAS(aCAS),在术中帮助确定恢复 TKA 对准所需的角度和切除量。本研究的目的是确定在一个培训机构的受训者参与的病例中,采用CON和aCAS方法进行的TKA对位异常值的数量:在这项回顾性单中心研究中,我们对培训机构实施的 150 例初次 TKA 进行了放射学分析。在 75 个 aCAS 和 75 个 CON 膝关节的术后即刻 X 光片上评估了股骨远端内侧角 (DFA)、胫骨近端内侧角 (PTA) 和后斜角 (PSA)。离群测量的定义是:DFA超出外翻5°±3°;PTA超出中轴±3°;PSA超出0-7°(CR)和0-5°(PS)(Posterior Stabilized)。数据采用卡方检验、方差分析和学生 t 检验进行分析:结果:两组的异常值总数没有明显差异(8% aCAS 对 9.8% CON,P=0.508)。此外,在对 aCAS 和 CON TKA 进行比较时,DFA(8% 对 8%,P=1.00)、PTA(4% 对 9%,P=0.184)和 PSA(12% 对 12%,P=1.00)等放射学测量结果也无明显差异:在一家培训机构进行的初级 TKA 显示,aCAS 和 CON 方法在异常值总数或术后各影像学测量的异常值数量方面没有显著差异。这项研究表明,在培训机构的受训者参与的病例中,使用 aCAS 进行 TKAs 时,限制异常值没有优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
139
期刊介绍: The Journal of Knee Surgery covers a range of issues relating to the orthopaedic techniques of arthroscopy, arthroplasty, and reconstructive surgery of the knee joint. In addition to original peer-review articles, this periodical provides details on emerging surgical techniques, as well as reviews and special focus sections. Topics of interest include cruciate ligament repair and reconstruction, bone grafting, cartilage regeneration, and magnetic resonance imaging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信