Yeon-Koo Kang, Seunggyun Ha, Ji Bong Jeong, So Won Oh
{"title":"The value of PET/CT radiomics for predicting survival outcomes in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.","authors":"Yeon-Koo Kang, Seunggyun Ha, Ji Bong Jeong, So Won Oh","doi":"10.1038/s41598-024-77022-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is associated with poor prognosis even without distant metastases, necessitating in-depth characterization of primary tumors for survival prediction. We assessed the feasibility of using FDG-PET/CT radiomics to predict overall survival (OS) in PDAC. This retrospective study included PDAC patients without distant metastasis who underwent FDG-PET/CT for initial staging. Primary tumors were segmented from FDG-PET/CT images, extracting 222 radiomics features. A radiomics-based risk score (Rad-score) was developed using Cox proportional hazards regression with LASSO to predict OS. The prognostic performance of the Rad-score was compared with a clinical model (demographics, disease stage, laboratory results) using Harrell's concordance index (C-index) and bootstrapping. 140 patients were included, with a mortality rate was 72.9% during follow-up (total population, 19.5 ± 19.2 months; survivors, 34.4 ± 28.8 months). Eleven radiomics features were significant for survival prediction. The Rad-score predicted OS with a C-index of 0.681 [95% CI, 0.632-0.731]. A model integrating clinical parameters and Rad-score outperformed the clinical-only model in predicting OS (C-index 0.740 [0.715-0.816] vs. 0.673 [0.650-0.766]; C-index difference 0.067 [0.014-0.113]; P < 0.001). These findings suggest that incorporating FDG-PET/CT radiomics into preexisting prognotic stratification paradiagm may enhance survival prediction in PDAC, warranting large-scale studies to confirm its applicability in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"14 1","pages":"28958"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11584753/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-77022-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is associated with poor prognosis even without distant metastases, necessitating in-depth characterization of primary tumors for survival prediction. We assessed the feasibility of using FDG-PET/CT radiomics to predict overall survival (OS) in PDAC. This retrospective study included PDAC patients without distant metastasis who underwent FDG-PET/CT for initial staging. Primary tumors were segmented from FDG-PET/CT images, extracting 222 radiomics features. A radiomics-based risk score (Rad-score) was developed using Cox proportional hazards regression with LASSO to predict OS. The prognostic performance of the Rad-score was compared with a clinical model (demographics, disease stage, laboratory results) using Harrell's concordance index (C-index) and bootstrapping. 140 patients were included, with a mortality rate was 72.9% during follow-up (total population, 19.5 ± 19.2 months; survivors, 34.4 ± 28.8 months). Eleven radiomics features were significant for survival prediction. The Rad-score predicted OS with a C-index of 0.681 [95% CI, 0.632-0.731]. A model integrating clinical parameters and Rad-score outperformed the clinical-only model in predicting OS (C-index 0.740 [0.715-0.816] vs. 0.673 [0.650-0.766]; C-index difference 0.067 [0.014-0.113]; P < 0.001). These findings suggest that incorporating FDG-PET/CT radiomics into preexisting prognotic stratification paradiagm may enhance survival prediction in PDAC, warranting large-scale studies to confirm its applicability in clinical practice.
期刊介绍:
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.