Modeling the relative response factor of small molecules in positive electrospray ionization†

IF 3.9 3区 化学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
RSC Advances Pub Date : 2024-11-22 DOI:10.1039/D4RA06695B
Dimitri Abrahamsson, Lelouda-Athanasia Koronaiou, Trevor Johnson, Junjie Yang, Xiaowen Ji and Dimitra A. Lambropoulou
{"title":"Modeling the relative response factor of small molecules in positive electrospray ionization†","authors":"Dimitri Abrahamsson, Lelouda-Athanasia Koronaiou, Trevor Johnson, Junjie Yang, Xiaowen Ji and Dimitra A. Lambropoulou","doi":"10.1039/D4RA06695B","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Technological advancements in liquid chromatography (LC) electrospray ionization (ESI) high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) have made it an increasingly popular analytical technique in non-targeted analysis (NTA) of environmental and biological samples. One critical limitation of current methods in NTA is the lack of available analytical standards for many of the compounds detected in biological and environmental samples. Computational approaches can provide estimates of concentrations by modeling the relative response factor of a compound (RRF) expressed as the peak area of a given peak divided by its concentration. In this paper, we explore the application of molecular dynamics (MD) in the development of a computational workflow for predicting RRF. We obtained measurements of RRF for 48 compounds with LC – quadrupole time-of-flight (QTOF) MS and calculated their RRF. We used the CGenFF force field to generate the topologies and GROMACS to conduct the (MD) simulations. We calculated the Lennard-Jones and Coulomb interactions between the analytes and all other molecules in the ESI droplet, which were then sampled to construct a multilinear regression model for predicting RRF using Monte Carlo simulations. The best performing model showed a coefficient of determination (<em>R</em><small><sup>2</sup></small>) of 0.82 and a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.13 log units. This performance is comparable to other predictive models including machine learning models. While there is a need for further evaluation of diverse chemical structures, our approach showed promise in predictions of RRF.</p>","PeriodicalId":102,"journal":{"name":"RSC Advances","volume":" 50","pages":" 37470-37482"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlepdf/2024/ra/d4ra06695b?page=search","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RSC Advances","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2024/ra/d4ra06695b","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Technological advancements in liquid chromatography (LC) electrospray ionization (ESI) high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) have made it an increasingly popular analytical technique in non-targeted analysis (NTA) of environmental and biological samples. One critical limitation of current methods in NTA is the lack of available analytical standards for many of the compounds detected in biological and environmental samples. Computational approaches can provide estimates of concentrations by modeling the relative response factor of a compound (RRF) expressed as the peak area of a given peak divided by its concentration. In this paper, we explore the application of molecular dynamics (MD) in the development of a computational workflow for predicting RRF. We obtained measurements of RRF for 48 compounds with LC – quadrupole time-of-flight (QTOF) MS and calculated their RRF. We used the CGenFF force field to generate the topologies and GROMACS to conduct the (MD) simulations. We calculated the Lennard-Jones and Coulomb interactions between the analytes and all other molecules in the ESI droplet, which were then sampled to construct a multilinear regression model for predicting RRF using Monte Carlo simulations. The best performing model showed a coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.82 and a mean absolute error (MAE) of 0.13 log units. This performance is comparable to other predictive models including machine learning models. While there is a need for further evaluation of diverse chemical structures, our approach showed promise in predictions of RRF.

Abstract Image

小分子在正电喷雾离子化过程中的相对响应因子建模†。
液相色谱(LC)电喷雾离子化(ESI)高分辨率质谱(HRMS)技术的进步使其在环境和生物样本的非目标分析(NTA)中成为一种越来越受欢迎的分析技术。当前 NTA 方法的一个关键局限是缺乏生物和环境样本中检测到的许多化合物的可用分析标准。计算方法可以通过模拟化合物的相对响应因子(RRF)来估算浓度,RRF 用给定峰值的峰面积除以浓度表示。本文探讨了分子动力学(MD)在预测 RRF 的计算工作流程开发中的应用。我们利用 LC - quadrupole time-of-flight (QTOF) MS 获得了 48 种化合物的 RRF 测量值,并计算了它们的 RRF。我们使用 CGenFF 力场生成拓扑结构,并使用 GROMACS 进行 (MD) 模拟。我们计算了分析物与 ESI 液滴中所有其他分子之间的伦纳德-琼斯和库仑相互作用,然后对其进行采样,利用蒙特卡罗模拟构建了一个多线性回归模型来预测 RRF。表现最好的模型的决定系数 (R2) 为 0.82,平均绝对误差 (MAE) 为 0.13 对数单位。这一性能可与包括机器学习模型在内的其他预测模型相媲美。虽然还需要对不同的化学结构进行进一步评估,但我们的方法在预测 RRF 方面显示出了良好的前景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
RSC Advances
RSC Advances chemical sciences-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.60%
发文量
3116
审稿时长
1.6 months
期刊介绍: An international, peer-reviewed journal covering all of the chemical sciences, including multidisciplinary and emerging areas. RSC Advances is a gold open access journal allowing researchers free access to research articles, and offering an affordable open access publishing option for authors around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信