[Validation of a rapid anesthesia satisfaction scale in the anesthetic procedure].

Arturo García-Galicia, Edgar Bautista-Soto, Álvaro José Montiel-Jarquín, Jared Milagros Hernández-Díaz, Martha Alicia Montes-Alvarado, Diana López-García, Maricarmen Tapia-Venancia, Nancy Rosalía Bertado-Ramírez
{"title":"[Validation of a rapid anesthesia satisfaction scale in the anesthetic procedure].","authors":"Arturo García-Galicia, Edgar Bautista-Soto, Álvaro José Montiel-Jarquín, Jared Milagros Hernández-Díaz, Martha Alicia Montes-Alvarado, Diana López-García, Maricarmen Tapia-Venancia, Nancy Rosalía Bertado-Ramírez","doi":"10.5281/zenodo.12667986","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The degree of satisfaction is an indicator of the quality of health care. Its measurement allows to understand the strengths and weaknesses associated with the anesthesia procedure and to improve the quality of service.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the validity and consistency of a new rapid scale of patient satisfaction with the anesthetic procedure.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>Comparative, longitudinal study in patients in post-anesthetic care. It consisted of two phases: Phase 1: Development of a Likert-type rapid scale to assess post-anesthesia patient satisfaction. Patients were pilot tested to evaluate the wording until 2 consecutive rounds were achieved. Phase 2: The developed instrument (ERSAPA according to its initials in Spanish) and the control questionnaire (LPPSq) were administered to patients after their discharge from the Post-Anesthesia Care Unit. Cronbach's alpha was used to evaluate the internal consistency between both tests, and Sperman's rho for convergent validity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 250 patients were surveyed. An overall satisfaction was achieved in 82.46% of the population. The domain with the highest agreement was pre-anesthesia consultation care. The internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) was 0.84, with a Spearman's convergent validity of 0.719 (p = 0.001), and an intra-observer reliability analysis by intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.945 (p = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The ERSAPA scale is consistent and valid for assessing patient satisfaction in the Anesthesia Service.</p>","PeriodicalId":94200,"journal":{"name":"Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social","volume":"62 5","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12667986","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The degree of satisfaction is an indicator of the quality of health care. Its measurement allows to understand the strengths and weaknesses associated with the anesthesia procedure and to improve the quality of service.

Objective: To evaluate the validity and consistency of a new rapid scale of patient satisfaction with the anesthetic procedure.

Material and methods: Comparative, longitudinal study in patients in post-anesthetic care. It consisted of two phases: Phase 1: Development of a Likert-type rapid scale to assess post-anesthesia patient satisfaction. Patients were pilot tested to evaluate the wording until 2 consecutive rounds were achieved. Phase 2: The developed instrument (ERSAPA according to its initials in Spanish) and the control questionnaire (LPPSq) were administered to patients after their discharge from the Post-Anesthesia Care Unit. Cronbach's alpha was used to evaluate the internal consistency between both tests, and Sperman's rho for convergent validity.

Results: A total of 250 patients were surveyed. An overall satisfaction was achieved in 82.46% of the population. The domain with the highest agreement was pre-anesthesia consultation care. The internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) was 0.84, with a Spearman's convergent validity of 0.719 (p = 0.001), and an intra-observer reliability analysis by intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.945 (p = 0.001).

Conclusions: The ERSAPA scale is consistent and valid for assessing patient satisfaction in the Anesthesia Service.

[麻醉过程中快速麻醉满意度量表的验证]。
背景:满意度是衡量医疗质量的一个指标。通过对其进行测量,可以了解麻醉程序的优缺点,从而提高服务质量:评估新的麻醉过程患者满意度快速量表的有效性和一致性:材料和方法:对麻醉后患者进行纵向比较研究。研究分为两个阶段:第一阶段:制定李克特快速量表,评估麻醉后患者的满意度。对患者进行试点测试,以评估其措辞,直到连续两轮测试结果出来为止。第二阶段:在患者从麻醉后护理病房出院后,对其使用所开发的工具(ERSAPA,西班牙文首字母缩写)和对照问卷(LPPSq)。采用克朗巴赫系数(Cronbach's alpha)评估两个测试的内部一致性,采用斯佩尔曼系数(Sperman's rho)评估两个测试的收敛有效性:共有 250 名患者接受了调查。总体满意度为 82.46%。同意度最高的领域是麻醉前咨询护理。内部一致性(Cronbach's alpha)为 0.84,斯皮尔曼收敛效度为 0.719(P = 0.001),通过类内相关系数分析得出的观察者内部可靠性为 0.945(P = 0.001):ERSAPA量表在评估麻醉科患者满意度方面具有一致性和有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信