ABO-identical versus incompatible platelet transfusion in patients with intracranial hemorrhage.

IF 2.9 3区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
PLoS ONE Pub Date : 2024-11-21 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0312602
Lauren K Dunn, Emily Venner, Matthew Nguyen, Jose Perdomo Trejo, Zachary Holley, Bhiken I Naik, Jenna Khan, Michael Mazzeffi
{"title":"ABO-identical versus incompatible platelet transfusion in patients with intracranial hemorrhage.","authors":"Lauren K Dunn, Emily Venner, Matthew Nguyen, Jose Perdomo Trejo, Zachary Holley, Bhiken I Naik, Jenna Khan, Michael Mazzeffi","doi":"10.1371/journal.pone.0312602","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients with spontaneous and traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) are frequently transfused platelets to treat thrombocytopenia, platelet function defects, and reverse antiplatelet drugs. ABO-identical platelet transfusion has been suggested to lead to higher post-transfusion platelet increments compared to major-ABO incompatible transfusion. We hypothesized that patients who received ABO-identical transfusion would have higher post-transfusion platelet increments and superior neurologic outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adults with traumatic or non-traumatic ICH from January 1st 2018 to December 31st 2022 were identified using electronic medical records and international classification of disease (ICD)-10 codes. Patients were excluded if they lacked a platelet count within 24 hours before and within 24 hours after transfusion or if they received multiple platelet transfusions before their platelet count was remeasured. After stratification by ABO-identical, ABO-major incompatible, and ABO-minor incompatible transfusion, post transfusion increments were compared, as were clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 167 patients who received platelet transfusion, 76 (45.5%) received ABO-identical transfusion, 54 (32.3%) received ABO-major incompatible transfusion, and 37 (22.2%) received ABO-minor incompatible transfusion. There were no significant differences in absolute platelet increment between groups. The median increment was 7x109/L for ABO-identical platelets, 10x109/L for ABO-major incompatible platelets, and 11x109/L for ABO-minor incompatible platelets, p = .87. There was no significant difference in the percentage of patients discharged alive with modified Rankin score of 1 or 2 or cerebral performance category 1 or 2 between groups (p = .56 and .39 respectively). After adjusting for confounders in a general linear model there remained no associations between ABO compatibility and platelet increment after transfusion.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our data support similar efficacy for ABO-identical and ABO-incompatible platelet transfusion in patients with ICH.</p>","PeriodicalId":20189,"journal":{"name":"PLoS ONE","volume":"19 11","pages":"e0312602"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11581237/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS ONE","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0312602","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients with spontaneous and traumatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) are frequently transfused platelets to treat thrombocytopenia, platelet function defects, and reverse antiplatelet drugs. ABO-identical platelet transfusion has been suggested to lead to higher post-transfusion platelet increments compared to major-ABO incompatible transfusion. We hypothesized that patients who received ABO-identical transfusion would have higher post-transfusion platelet increments and superior neurologic outcomes.

Methods: Adults with traumatic or non-traumatic ICH from January 1st 2018 to December 31st 2022 were identified using electronic medical records and international classification of disease (ICD)-10 codes. Patients were excluded if they lacked a platelet count within 24 hours before and within 24 hours after transfusion or if they received multiple platelet transfusions before their platelet count was remeasured. After stratification by ABO-identical, ABO-major incompatible, and ABO-minor incompatible transfusion, post transfusion increments were compared, as were clinical outcomes.

Results: Among 167 patients who received platelet transfusion, 76 (45.5%) received ABO-identical transfusion, 54 (32.3%) received ABO-major incompatible transfusion, and 37 (22.2%) received ABO-minor incompatible transfusion. There were no significant differences in absolute platelet increment between groups. The median increment was 7x109/L for ABO-identical platelets, 10x109/L for ABO-major incompatible platelets, and 11x109/L for ABO-minor incompatible platelets, p = .87. There was no significant difference in the percentage of patients discharged alive with modified Rankin score of 1 or 2 or cerebral performance category 1 or 2 between groups (p = .56 and .39 respectively). After adjusting for confounders in a general linear model there remained no associations between ABO compatibility and platelet increment after transfusion.

Conclusions: Our data support similar efficacy for ABO-identical and ABO-incompatible platelet transfusion in patients with ICH.

颅内出血患者输注 ABO 相同血小板与不相容血小板的比较。
背景:自发性和外伤性颅内出血(ICH)患者经常需要输注血小板来治疗血小板减少症、血小板功能缺陷和逆转抗血小板药物。有研究表明,与主要 ABO 血型不相容的输血相比,ABO 相同的血小板输注会导致更高的输血后血小板增量。我们假设,接受 ABO 相同输血的患者输血后血小板增量会更高,神经系统预后会更好:使用电子病历和国际疾病分类(ICD)-10 代码识别 2018 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 12 月 31 日期间患有创伤性或非创伤性 ICH 的成人。如果患者在输血前 24 小时内和输血后 24 小时内未进行血小板计数,或在重新测量血小板计数前接受过多次血小板输注,则将其排除在外。按ABO血型相同、ABO血型主要不相容和ABO血型次要不相容进行分层后,比较了输血后的增量和临床结果:在 167 名接受血小板输注的患者中,76 人(45.5%)接受了 ABO 血型相同的输注,54 人(32.3%)接受了 ABO 大体不相容的输注,37 人(22.2%)接受了 ABO 小体不相容的输注。各组间血小板绝对增量无明显差异。ABO血型相同的血小板增量中位数为7x109/L,ABO血型大体不相容的血小板增量中位数为10x109/L,ABO血型小体不相容的血小板增量中位数为11x109/L,P = .87。改良 Rankin 评分为 1 分或 2 分或脑功能为 1 级或 2 级的患者出院时存活的比例在各组间无明显差异(p = .56 和 .39)。在一般线性模型中对混杂因素进行调整后,ABO相容性与输血后血小板增量之间仍然没有关联:我们的数据支持对 ICH 患者输注 ABO 相同和 ABO 不相容血小板具有相似的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PLoS ONE
PLoS ONE 生物-生物学
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
5.40%
发文量
14242
审稿时长
3.7 months
期刊介绍: PLOS ONE is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online publication. PLOS ONE welcomes reports on primary research from any scientific discipline. It provides: * Open-access—freely accessible online, authors retain copyright * Fast publication times * Peer review by expert, practicing researchers * Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact * Community-based dialogue on articles * Worldwide media coverage
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信