Frontal alpha asymmetry as a marker of approach motivation? Insights from a cooperative forking path analysis.

IF 6.4 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Katharina Paul, André Beauducel, Jürgen Hennig, Johannes Hewig, Andrea Hildebrandt, Corinna Kührt, Leon Lange, Erik Malte Mueller, Roman Osinsky, Elisa Porth, Anja Riesel, Johannes Rodrigues, Christoph Scheffel, Cassie Ann Short, Jutta Stahl, Alexander Strobel, Jan Wacker
{"title":"Frontal alpha asymmetry as a marker of approach motivation? Insights from a cooperative forking path analysis.","authors":"Katharina Paul, André Beauducel, Jürgen Hennig, Johannes Hewig, Andrea Hildebrandt, Corinna Kührt, Leon Lange, Erik Malte Mueller, Roman Osinsky, Elisa Porth, Anja Riesel, Johannes Rodrigues, Christoph Scheffel, Cassie Ann Short, Jutta Stahl, Alexander Strobel, Jan Wacker","doi":"10.1037/pspp0000503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Frontal alpha asymmetry has been proposed as a ubiquitous marker of state and trait approach motivation, but recent meta-analyses found weak or nonexistent links with personality traits. It has been suggested that frontal asymmetry may show stronger individual differences in situations that elicit approach motivation (state-trait interaction). To investigate this with sufficient statistical power, we utilized data from the CoScience project (<i>N</i> = 740). Frontal asymmetry was measured during a resting period, a picture viewing task, and a guessing task, which were expected to trigger different levels of approach motivation. Results showed that frontal asymmetry was not reliably affected by task manipulations and did not relate to self-reported traits. Furthermore, Bayesian statistics and a cooperative forking path analysis were used to supplement the preregistered analyses. To conclude, this comprehensive analysis could not support the validity of frontal asymmetry as a marker of approach motivation, neither as a reliable state nor as a trait marker. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":16691,"journal":{"name":"Journal of personality and social psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of personality and social psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000503","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Frontal alpha asymmetry has been proposed as a ubiquitous marker of state and trait approach motivation, but recent meta-analyses found weak or nonexistent links with personality traits. It has been suggested that frontal asymmetry may show stronger individual differences in situations that elicit approach motivation (state-trait interaction). To investigate this with sufficient statistical power, we utilized data from the CoScience project (N = 740). Frontal asymmetry was measured during a resting period, a picture viewing task, and a guessing task, which were expected to trigger different levels of approach motivation. Results showed that frontal asymmetry was not reliably affected by task manipulations and did not relate to self-reported traits. Furthermore, Bayesian statistics and a cooperative forking path analysis were used to supplement the preregistered analyses. To conclude, this comprehensive analysis could not support the validity of frontal asymmetry as a marker of approach motivation, neither as a reliable state nor as a trait marker. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).

额叶α不对称是接近动机的标记?合作分叉路径分析的启示。
额叶α不对称被认为是状态和特质接近动机的普遍标记,但最近的荟萃分析发现,它与人格特质之间的联系很弱或根本不存在联系。有人认为,额叶不对称可能会在引起接近动机的情境中表现出更强的个体差异(状态-特质交互作用)。为了以足够的统计能力对此进行研究,我们利用了来自 CoScience 项目(N = 740)的数据。在休息时间、观看图片任务和猜测任务期间测量了额叶不对称,这些任务预计会引发不同程度的接近动机。结果表明,额叶不对称并没有受到任务操作的可靠影响,也与自我报告的特质无关。此外,贝叶斯统计法和合作分叉路径分析也用于补充预先登记的分析。总之,这项综合分析不能支持额叶不对称作为接近动机标记的有效性,无论是作为一种可靠的状态还是作为一种特质标记。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.70
自引率
3.90%
发文量
250
期刊介绍: Journal of personality and social psychology publishes original papers in all areas of personality and social psychology and emphasizes empirical reports, but may include specialized theoretical, methodological, and review papers.Journal of personality and social psychology is divided into three independently edited sections. Attitudes and Social Cognition addresses all aspects of psychology (e.g., attitudes, cognition, emotion, motivation) that take place in significant micro- and macrolevel social contexts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信