KangDuo surgical robot versus da Vinci robotic system in urologic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 2.2 3区医学 Q2 SURGERY

Journal of Robotic Surgery Pub Date : 2024-11-21 DOI:10.1007/s11701-024-02165-5

Zhi Wen, Yan-Xin Yang, Sha Yu, Qing-Feng Liu, Yu Zhang, Wen-Wen Yang, Le Yang

{"title":"KangDuo surgical robot versus da Vinci robotic system in urologic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Zhi Wen, Yan-Xin Yang, Sha Yu, Qing-Feng Liu, Yu Zhang, Wen-Wen Yang, Le Yang","doi":"10.1007/s11701-024-02165-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>It was a systematic review and meta-analysis that aimed to compare the efficiency and safety of robot-assisted urological surgery using both the KangDuo and da Vinci robotic systems. The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for all papers published through September 1, 2024. The focus was on English-language papers comparing the KangDuo surgical robot and the da Vinci system in urological procedures. The screening method focused on RCTs and cohort studies and followed strict criteria. Three cohort studies and two randomised controlled trials with 300 adult urological surgery patients met the inclusion criteria. These 150 patients were operated on with the KangDuo robotic system and 150 with the da Vinci system. The investigation showed that whereas KangDuo operations were slightly longer, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, and postoperative complication rates were similar. The KangDuo robotic system performs urological surgery as well as the da Vinci system, although it takes longer. Future large-scale multicenter randomized trials are recommended to gather further evidence and enhance clinical understanding.</p>","PeriodicalId":47616,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","volume":"19 1","pages":"6"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Robotic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-024-02165-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

It was a systematic review and meta-analysis that aimed to compare the efficiency and safety of robot-assisted urological surgery using both the KangDuo and da Vinci robotic systems. The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched for all papers published through September 1, 2024. The focus was on English-language papers comparing the KangDuo surgical robot and the da Vinci system in urological procedures. The screening method focused on RCTs and cohort studies and followed strict criteria. Three cohort studies and two randomised controlled trials with 300 adult urological surgery patients met the inclusion criteria. These 150 patients were operated on with the KangDuo robotic system and 150 with the da Vinci system. The investigation showed that whereas KangDuo operations were slightly longer, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, and postoperative complication rates were similar. The KangDuo robotic system performs urological surgery as well as the da Vinci system, although it takes longer. Future large-scale multicenter randomized trials are recommended to gather further evidence and enhance clinical understanding.

查看原文本刊更多论文

康导手术机器人与达芬奇机器人系统在泌尿外科手术中的对比：系统综述与荟萃分析。

这是一项系统综述和荟萃分析，旨在比较使用康导和达芬奇机器人系统进行机器人辅助泌尿外科手术的效率和安全性。研究人员在 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane Library 数据库中检索了 2024 年 9 月 1 日之前发表的所有论文。重点是在泌尿外科手术中比较康导手术机器人和达芬奇系统的英文论文。筛选方法侧重于随机对照研究和队列研究，并遵循严格的标准。有三项队列研究和两项随机对照试验符合纳入标准，共涉及 300 名成人泌尿外科手术患者。其中150名患者使用康导机器人系统进行手术，150名患者使用达芬奇系统进行手术。调查显示，康导手术时间稍长，但术中失血量、住院时间和术后并发症发生率相似。康导机器人系统与达芬奇系统一样能完成泌尿外科手术，只是手术时间更长。建议今后开展大规模多中心随机试验，以收集更多证据，提高临床认识。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of Robotic Surgery SURGERY-

CiteScore

4.20

自引率

8.70%

发文量

145

期刊介绍： The aim of the Journal of Robotic Surgery is to become the leading worldwide journal for publication of articles related to robotic surgery, encompassing surgical simulation and integrated imaging techniques. The journal provides a centralized, focused resource for physicians wishing to publish their experience or those wishing to avail themselves of the most up-to-date findings.The journal reports on advance in a wide range of surgical specialties including adult and pediatric urology, general surgery, cardiac surgery, gynecology, ENT, orthopedics and neurosurgery.The use of robotics in surgery is broad-based and will undoubtedly expand over the next decade as new technical innovations and techniques increase the applicability of its use. The journal intends to capture this trend as it develops.