Communicating the risk of recall in mammography screening - Enskilment in breast radiography.

IF 2.5 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
E G Gram, A B R Jønsson, L B Larsen, M Adlouni, B Mussmann
{"title":"Communicating the risk of recall in mammography screening - Enskilment in breast radiography.","authors":"E G Gram, A B R Jønsson, L B Larsen, M Adlouni, B Mussmann","doi":"10.1016/j.radi.2024.10.025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In Denmark, there are no official guidelines on how to inform women about the risk of recall during mammography screening, leading to varied local practices. This study explored the experiences of radiographers at a Danish mammography screening unit and breast cancer assessment clinic communicating the risk of recall and false-positive results.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study involved 12 weeks of ethnographic fieldwork over the course of one year, along with eleven semi-structured interviews with radiographers.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Radiographers worked at the screening unit and the breast cancer assessment clinic. This provided them an opportunity to learn from their colleagues, improve communication skills, and the ability to recognise and respond to emotional reactions. The radiographers were aware that recalls might cause psychosocial consequences and had thus established a local practice sensitive to this. The radiographers informed women at their first screening about the risk of recall and false positives, aiming to mitigate these consequences.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings highlight the advantages of radiographers working in both screening and clinical settings.</p><p><strong>Implications for practice: </strong>Insights from this study may inspire future guidelines or local screening practices and improve patient care. Furthermore, results may inform department managers' workload organisation.</p>","PeriodicalId":47416,"journal":{"name":"Radiography","volume":"31 1","pages":"139-145"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiography","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radi.2024.10.025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: In Denmark, there are no official guidelines on how to inform women about the risk of recall during mammography screening, leading to varied local practices. This study explored the experiences of radiographers at a Danish mammography screening unit and breast cancer assessment clinic communicating the risk of recall and false-positive results.

Methods: This study involved 12 weeks of ethnographic fieldwork over the course of one year, along with eleven semi-structured interviews with radiographers.

Results: Radiographers worked at the screening unit and the breast cancer assessment clinic. This provided them an opportunity to learn from their colleagues, improve communication skills, and the ability to recognise and respond to emotional reactions. The radiographers were aware that recalls might cause psychosocial consequences and had thus established a local practice sensitive to this. The radiographers informed women at their first screening about the risk of recall and false positives, aiming to mitigate these consequences.

Conclusion: These findings highlight the advantages of radiographers working in both screening and clinical settings.

Implications for practice: Insights from this study may inspire future guidelines or local screening practices and improve patient care. Furthermore, results may inform department managers' workload organisation.

传达乳腺放射摄影筛查中的召回风险 - Enskilment in breast radiography.
导言:在丹麦,关于如何告知妇女乳腺 X 射线摄影筛查中的召回风险并没有官方指南,因此当地的做法各不相同。本研究探讨了丹麦一家乳腺 X 射线照相筛查机构和乳腺癌评估诊所的放射技师在告知回访风险和假阳性结果方面的经验:本研究在一年内进行了为期 12 周的人种学实地调查,并对放射技师进行了 11 次半结构化访谈:结果:放射技师在筛查单位和乳腺癌评估诊所工作。这为他们提供了向同事学习的机会,提高了沟通技巧以及识别和应对情绪反应的能力。放射技师们意识到召回可能会造成社会心理后果,因此在当地建立了对这一问题敏感的做法。放射技师在妇女第一次筛查时就告知她们召回和假阳性的风险,旨在减轻这些后果:这些发现凸显了放射技师在筛查和临床环境中工作的优势:本研究的启示可能会对未来的指南或当地筛查实践有所启发,并改善患者护理。此外,研究结果还可为科室管理人员的工作量安排提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Radiography
Radiography RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
34.60%
发文量
169
审稿时长
63 days
期刊介绍: Radiography is an International, English language, peer-reviewed journal of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy. Radiography is the official professional journal of the College of Radiographers and is published quarterly. Radiography aims to publish the highest quality material, both clinical and scientific, on all aspects of diagnostic imaging and radiation therapy and oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信