Isolated and Combined Effects of Sedentary Behaviour and Physical Activity on Muscle Strength in Older Adults: A Prospective Cohort Study.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Helen Rocha Machado, Lucas Lima Galvão, Rizia Rocha-Silva, Jorge Lopes Cavalcante Neto, Jair Sindra Virtuoso Junior, Sheilla Tribess, Ricardo Borges Viana, Claudio Andre Barbosa de Lira, Douglas de Assis Teles Santos
{"title":"Isolated and Combined Effects of Sedentary Behaviour and Physical Activity on Muscle Strength in Older Adults: A Prospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Helen Rocha Machado, Lucas Lima Galvão, Rizia Rocha-Silva, Jorge Lopes Cavalcante Neto, Jair Sindra Virtuoso Junior, Sheilla Tribess, Ricardo Borges Viana, Claudio Andre Barbosa de Lira, Douglas de Assis Teles Santos","doi":"10.1111/jocn.17540","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>We aim the isolated and combined effects of sedentary behaviour exposure time and physical activity levels on muscle strength in older adults.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This prospective observational cohort study, analytical in nature, using exploratory survey methods and physical performance testing. With 5-year longitudinal follow-up (2015-2020).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 459 older adults participated in the baseline, with a total of 224 being included/located again in the follow-up. We evaluate muscle strength using handgrip tests and sit-to-stand tests. The international physical activity questionnaire was used to measure physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Generalised Estimation Equations tested both independent and combined effects, reporting results as β coefficients and confidence intervals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Older adults exhibiting low sedentary behaviour displayed enhanced handgrip strength compared to those with high sedentary behaviour. Notably, older adults who were sufficiently active with low sedentary behaviour, sufficiently active with high sedentary behaviour, and insufficiently active with low sedentary behaviour showed increased handgrip strength compared to their counterparts who were insufficiently active with high sedentary behaviour. This trend was consistent for lower limb strength.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Interventions that encourage a reduction in sedentary behaviour and an increase in physical activity are essential to maintain muscle strength among older adults.</p><p><strong>Implications for practice: </strong>The findings of this study underscore the importance of addressing both sedentary behaviour and physical activity levels in clinical interventions aimed at preserving muscle strength in older adults. Routine assessments of physical activity and sedentary behaviour could help tailor personalised exercise programs, potentially enhancing functional independence and reducing the risk of frailty and disability in older patients.</p><p><strong>Patient or public contribution: </strong>Patients were involved in the sample of the study.</p><p><strong>Reporting method: </strong>This study was conducted in accordance with the Strengthening Research in Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines.</p>","PeriodicalId":50236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.17540","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: We aim the isolated and combined effects of sedentary behaviour exposure time and physical activity levels on muscle strength in older adults.

Design: This prospective observational cohort study, analytical in nature, using exploratory survey methods and physical performance testing. With 5-year longitudinal follow-up (2015-2020).

Methods: A total of 459 older adults participated in the baseline, with a total of 224 being included/located again in the follow-up. We evaluate muscle strength using handgrip tests and sit-to-stand tests. The international physical activity questionnaire was used to measure physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Generalised Estimation Equations tested both independent and combined effects, reporting results as β coefficients and confidence intervals.

Results: Older adults exhibiting low sedentary behaviour displayed enhanced handgrip strength compared to those with high sedentary behaviour. Notably, older adults who were sufficiently active with low sedentary behaviour, sufficiently active with high sedentary behaviour, and insufficiently active with low sedentary behaviour showed increased handgrip strength compared to their counterparts who were insufficiently active with high sedentary behaviour. This trend was consistent for lower limb strength.

Conclusion: Interventions that encourage a reduction in sedentary behaviour and an increase in physical activity are essential to maintain muscle strength among older adults.

Implications for practice: The findings of this study underscore the importance of addressing both sedentary behaviour and physical activity levels in clinical interventions aimed at preserving muscle strength in older adults. Routine assessments of physical activity and sedentary behaviour could help tailor personalised exercise programs, potentially enhancing functional independence and reducing the risk of frailty and disability in older patients.

Patient or public contribution: Patients were involved in the sample of the study.

Reporting method: This study was conducted in accordance with the Strengthening Research in Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines.

久坐行为和体育锻炼对老年人肌肉力量的单独和综合影响:一项前瞻性队列研究
目的:我们旨在研究久坐行为暴露时间和体力活动水平对老年人肌肉力量的单独和综合影响:这项前瞻性观察队列研究具有分析性质,采用探索性调查方法和体能测试。方法:共有 459 名老年人参加了这项研究:共有 459 名老年人参与了基线研究,其中 224 人在后续研究中再次被纳入/定位。我们通过手握测试和坐立测试来评估肌肉力量。国际体力活动问卷用于测量体力活动和久坐行为。广义估计方程测试了独立效应和综合效应,以β系数和置信区间报告结果:结果:与久坐行为严重的老年人相比,久坐行为较少的老年人手握力增强。值得注意的是,与久坐行为严重而活动不足的老年人相比,久坐行为少而活动充分的老年人、久坐行为多而活动充分的老年人以及久坐行为少而活动不足的老年人的手握力都有所增强。这一趋势与下肢力量一致:结论:鼓励减少久坐行为和增加体育锻炼的干预措施对于保持老年人的肌肉力量至关重要:本研究结果强调了在旨在保持老年人肌肉力量的临床干预中解决久坐行为和体育锻炼水平的重要性。对体力活动和久坐行为进行常规评估有助于量身定制个性化的锻炼计划,从而有可能提高老年患者的功能独立性并降低其体弱和残疾的风险:患者或公众的贡献:患者参与了研究样本的采集:本研究根据加强流行病学观察性研究(STROBE)指南进行。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Nursing (JCN) is an international, peer reviewed, scientific journal that seeks to promote the development and exchange of knowledge that is directly relevant to all spheres of nursing practice. The primary aim is to promote a high standard of clinically related scholarship which advances and supports the practice and discipline of nursing. The Journal also aims to promote the international exchange of ideas and experience that draws from the different cultures in which practice takes place. Further, JCN seeks to enrich insight into clinical need and the implications for nursing intervention and models of service delivery. Emphasis is placed on promoting critical debate on the art and science of nursing practice. JCN is essential reading for anyone involved in nursing practice, whether clinicians, researchers, educators, managers, policy makers, or students. The development of clinical practice and the changing patterns of inter-professional working are also central to JCN''s scope of interest. Contributions are welcomed from other health professionals on issues that have a direct impact on nursing practice. We publish high quality papers from across the methodological spectrum that make an important and novel contribution to the field of clinical nursing (regardless of where care is provided), and which demonstrate clinical application and international relevance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信