Determination of DNA content as quality control in decellularized tissues: challenges and pitfalls.

IF 5.6 1区 医学 Q1 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS
Regenerative Biomaterials Pub Date : 2024-10-24 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1093/rb/rbae123
Charlot Philips, Lisanne Terrie, Ewout Muylle, Lieven Thorrez
{"title":"Determination of DNA content as quality control in decellularized tissues: challenges and pitfalls.","authors":"Charlot Philips, Lisanne Terrie, Ewout Muylle, Lieven Thorrez","doi":"10.1093/rb/rbae123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Decellularized organs and tissues are emerging within the field of regenerative medicine to meet the growing demand for organ and tissue transplantation. Quality control of these acellular matrices prior to transplantation is of paramount importance to ensure the absence of an adverse reaction. In particular, thorough evaluation of the DNA content is essential but also poses technical challenges. Therefore, in this study, we compared different methods for quantitative and qualitative evaluation of DNA content in native and decellularized skeletal muscle tissue to identify strengths and weaknesses for each. Histological analysis revealed that Feulgen staining is more sensitive and robust than the commonly used hematoxylin-eosin and 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole staining for detection of remaining nuclear material. Furthermore, gel electrophoresis allowed to identify the quality and length of remaining DNA fragments. The results of the quantitative analysis indicated that direct measurement of DNA content in tissue lysates is preferred over silica-based extraction methods, since the latter resulted in the loss of small DNA fragments during extraction. Moreover, a weight loss correction factor should be implemented to take into account the impact of the decellularization on the extracellular matrix. With regard to the detection method, the results revealed that a fluorescence-based approach is more accurate than the use of UV/VIS absorbance. Through combination of the proposed methods, it should be possible to achieve a more standardized evaluation of novel acellular matrices in terms of DNA content and to enhance the predictability of clinical success.</p>","PeriodicalId":20929,"journal":{"name":"Regenerative Biomaterials","volume":"11 ","pages":"rbae123"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11578598/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regenerative Biomaterials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/rb/rbae123","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Decellularized organs and tissues are emerging within the field of regenerative medicine to meet the growing demand for organ and tissue transplantation. Quality control of these acellular matrices prior to transplantation is of paramount importance to ensure the absence of an adverse reaction. In particular, thorough evaluation of the DNA content is essential but also poses technical challenges. Therefore, in this study, we compared different methods for quantitative and qualitative evaluation of DNA content in native and decellularized skeletal muscle tissue to identify strengths and weaknesses for each. Histological analysis revealed that Feulgen staining is more sensitive and robust than the commonly used hematoxylin-eosin and 4',6-diamidino-2-phenylindole staining for detection of remaining nuclear material. Furthermore, gel electrophoresis allowed to identify the quality and length of remaining DNA fragments. The results of the quantitative analysis indicated that direct measurement of DNA content in tissue lysates is preferred over silica-based extraction methods, since the latter resulted in the loss of small DNA fragments during extraction. Moreover, a weight loss correction factor should be implemented to take into account the impact of the decellularization on the extracellular matrix. With regard to the detection method, the results revealed that a fluorescence-based approach is more accurate than the use of UV/VIS absorbance. Through combination of the proposed methods, it should be possible to achieve a more standardized evaluation of novel acellular matrices in terms of DNA content and to enhance the predictability of clinical success.

作为脱细胞组织质量控制的 DNA 含量测定:挑战与陷阱。
脱细胞器官和组织正在再生医学领域崭露头角,以满足日益增长的器官和组织移植需求。移植前对这些非细胞基质进行质量控制对确保无不良反应至关重要。尤其是对 DNA 含量的全面评估至关重要,但也带来了技术上的挑战。因此,在本研究中,我们比较了对原生和脱细胞骨骼肌组织中 DNA 含量进行定量和定性评估的不同方法,以确定每种方法的优缺点。组织学分析表明,与常用的苏木精-伊红和 4',6-二脒基-2-苯基吲哚染色法相比,Feulgen 染色法在检测残留核物质方面更灵敏、更稳健。此外,凝胶电泳还能鉴定残留 DNA 片段的质量和长度。定量分析的结果表明,直接测量组织裂解液中的 DNA 含量比基于二氧化硅的提取方法更可取,因为后者会在提取过程中损失小的 DNA 片段。此外,还应考虑脱细胞对细胞外基质的影响,采用失重校正因子。在检测方法方面,结果显示基于荧光的方法比使用紫外线/可见光吸光度更准确。通过结合所建议的方法,应该可以对新型无细胞基质的 DNA 含量进行更标准化的评估,并提高临床成功的可预测性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Regenerative Biomaterials
Regenerative Biomaterials Materials Science-Biomaterials
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
16.40%
发文量
92
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Regenerative Biomaterials is an international, interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed journal publishing the latest advances in biomaterials and regenerative medicine. The journal provides a forum for the publication of original research papers, reviews, clinical case reports, and commentaries on the topics relevant to the development of advanced regenerative biomaterials concerning novel regenerative technologies and therapeutic approaches for the regeneration and repair of damaged tissues and organs. The interactions of biomaterials with cells and tissue, especially with stem cells, will be of particular focus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信