Posterior Lumbar Element Enforcement by Decompression Alone with Interspinous Fixation without Interbody Fusion for the Surgical Management of Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Hyun-Woong Park, Moon-Soo Han, Ji-Ho Jung, Jong-Hwan Hong, Shin-Seok Lee, Jung-Kil Lee
{"title":"Posterior Lumbar Element Enforcement by Decompression Alone with Interspinous Fixation without Interbody Fusion for the Surgical Management of Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.","authors":"Hyun-Woong Park, Moon-Soo Han, Ji-Ho Jung, Jong-Hwan Hong, Shin-Seok Lee, Jung-Kil Lee","doi":"10.3340/jkns.2024.0172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis, interbody fusion surgery (IFS) has long been recommended as the gold standard of surgical management. However, IFS is less recommended for high-risk patients such as the elderly because it involves extensive surgery, with a long operation time and high volumes of blood loss, which lead to marked perioperative morbidity. We report an alternative primary and salvage treatment technique for high-risk lumbar spondylolisthesis through posterior lumbar element reinforcement using interspinous fixation (ISF) and decompression alone without interbody fusion.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Plain radiographs, computed tomography scans, and magnetic resonance imaging, taken at different intervals, were used to measure local disc height (DH), vertebral body slippage (BS), and segmental motion angle (SMA). A visual analogue scale (VAS) and the Oswestry disability index (ODI) were applied pre-operation and at the last follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The local SMA decreased significantly by 3.46±3.07°, from 10.61±3.42° preoperatively to 7.15±3.70 at the last follow-up (p<0.001). The DH decreased from 8.61±2.88 mm preoperatively to 8.41±2.48 mm at the last follow-up (p=0.074). The BS decreased from 3.49±4.29 mm preoperatively to 3.41±4.91 mm at the last follow-up (p=0.092). None of the patients reported worsening pain or an increased ODI after surgery, and there were no surgery-related complications.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Posterior lumbar element reinforcement by decompression alone with SPIRE™ fixation is an alternative primary and salvage treatment option for select patients with spondylolisthesis.</p>","PeriodicalId":16283,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2024.0172","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: In degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis, interbody fusion surgery (IFS) has long been recommended as the gold standard of surgical management. However, IFS is less recommended for high-risk patients such as the elderly because it involves extensive surgery, with a long operation time and high volumes of blood loss, which lead to marked perioperative morbidity. We report an alternative primary and salvage treatment technique for high-risk lumbar spondylolisthesis through posterior lumbar element reinforcement using interspinous fixation (ISF) and decompression alone without interbody fusion.

Methods: Plain radiographs, computed tomography scans, and magnetic resonance imaging, taken at different intervals, were used to measure local disc height (DH), vertebral body slippage (BS), and segmental motion angle (SMA). A visual analogue scale (VAS) and the Oswestry disability index (ODI) were applied pre-operation and at the last follow-up.

Results: The local SMA decreased significantly by 3.46±3.07°, from 10.61±3.42° preoperatively to 7.15±3.70 at the last follow-up (p<0.001). The DH decreased from 8.61±2.88 mm preoperatively to 8.41±2.48 mm at the last follow-up (p=0.074). The BS decreased from 3.49±4.29 mm preoperatively to 3.41±4.91 mm at the last follow-up (p=0.092). None of the patients reported worsening pain or an increased ODI after surgery, and there were no surgery-related complications.

Conclusion: Posterior lumbar element reinforcement by decompression alone with SPIRE™ fixation is an alternative primary and salvage treatment option for select patients with spondylolisthesis.

在腰椎滑脱症的手术治疗中,通过单纯减压和无椎间融合的棘突间固定来加固腰椎后部。
目的:对于退行性腰椎间盘突出症,椎体间融合手术(IFS)一直被推荐为手术治疗的金标准。然而,由于椎体间融合术涉及的手术范围广、手术时间长、失血量大,导致围手术期发病率明显增高,因此较少被推荐用于老年等高风险患者。我们报告了一种针对高风险腰椎滑脱症的替代性初级和挽救性治疗技术,即通过使用棘间固定(ISF)进行腰椎后路元件加固,并在不进行椎间融合的情况下单独进行减压:采用不同时间间隔拍摄的平片、计算机断层扫描和磁共振成像来测量局部椎间盘高度(DH)、椎体滑移(BS)和节段运动角度(SMA)。在手术前和最后一次随访时使用了视觉模拟量表(VAS)和Oswestry残疾指数(ODI):结果:局部SMA从术前的10.61±3.42°到最后一次随访时的7.15±3.70°,明显下降了3.46±3.07°(p结论:腰椎后路加固器的作用是将腰椎后路的活动角度从术前的10.61±3.42°减少到最后一次随访时的7.15±3.70°:通过单纯减压和 SPIRE™ 固定术进行腰椎后路元件加固,是脊柱滑脱症患者的另一种主要和挽救性治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.20%
发文量
109
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society (J Korean Neurosurg Soc) is the official journal of the Korean Neurosurgical Society, and published bimonthly (1st day of January, March, May, July, September, and November). It launched in October 31, 1972 with Volume 1 and Number 1. J Korean Neurosurg Soc aims to allow neurosurgeons from around the world to enrich their knowledge of patient management, education, and clinical or experimental research, and hence their professionalism. This journal publishes Laboratory Investigations, Clinical Articles, Review Articles, Case Reports, Technical Notes, and Letters to the Editor. Our field of interest involves clinical neurosurgery (cerebrovascular disease, neuro-oncology, skull base neurosurgery, spine, pediatric neurosurgery, functional neurosurgery, epilepsy, neuro-trauma, and peripheral nerve disease) and laboratory work in neuroscience.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信