Implant-supported fixed prostheses with cantilever: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Yusuke Kondo, Kiyoshi Sakai, Hajime Minakuchi, Takuya Horimai, Takuo Kuboki
{"title":"Implant-supported fixed prostheses with cantilever: a systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Yusuke Kondo, Kiyoshi Sakai, Hajime Minakuchi, Takuya Horimai, Takuo Kuboki","doi":"10.1186/s40729-024-00573-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This systematic review (SR) aimed to investigate whether the presence of a cantilever affects the results of implant treatment for partial edentulism, including an analysis of the anterior and posterior regions of the dental arches.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An electronic search was performed, and original articles published between 1995 and November 2023 were included. The outcomes were the implant survival rate, patient satisfaction, occurrence of mechanical complications, and marginal bone loss around the implants. Two SR members independently examined the validity of the studies, extracted evidence from the included studies, and performed risk of bias assessment, comprehensive evidence evaluation, and meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine studies met our inclusion criteria. Implant survival rate tended to be lower in the cantilever group, and marginal bone loss tended to be higher in the cantilever group; however, there was no significant difference. There was no significant difference in patient satisfaction based on the presence or absence of a cantilever. Moreover, the incidence of mechanical complications was significantly higher in the cantilever group. According to the analysis of anterior and posterior regions, implant survival rate tended to be lower in the cantilever group of the posterior region, and marginal bone loss around the implants tended to be higher in the cantilever group of the anterior region.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Implant-supported fixed prostheses with cantilevers did not negatively affect implant survival rate, marginal bone loss, or patient satisfaction. However, the incidence of mechanical complications significantly increased in the cantilever group.</p>","PeriodicalId":14076,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Implant Dentistry","volume":"10 1","pages":"57"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11582258/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Implant Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-024-00573-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This systematic review (SR) aimed to investigate whether the presence of a cantilever affects the results of implant treatment for partial edentulism, including an analysis of the anterior and posterior regions of the dental arches.

Methods: An electronic search was performed, and original articles published between 1995 and November 2023 were included. The outcomes were the implant survival rate, patient satisfaction, occurrence of mechanical complications, and marginal bone loss around the implants. Two SR members independently examined the validity of the studies, extracted evidence from the included studies, and performed risk of bias assessment, comprehensive evidence evaluation, and meta-analysis.

Results: Nine studies met our inclusion criteria. Implant survival rate tended to be lower in the cantilever group, and marginal bone loss tended to be higher in the cantilever group; however, there was no significant difference. There was no significant difference in patient satisfaction based on the presence or absence of a cantilever. Moreover, the incidence of mechanical complications was significantly higher in the cantilever group. According to the analysis of anterior and posterior regions, implant survival rate tended to be lower in the cantilever group of the posterior region, and marginal bone loss around the implants tended to be higher in the cantilever group of the anterior region.

Conclusion: Implant-supported fixed prostheses with cantilevers did not negatively affect implant survival rate, marginal bone loss, or patient satisfaction. However, the incidence of mechanical complications significantly increased in the cantilever group.

采用悬臂的种植体支撑固定义齿:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
目的:本系统综述(SR)旨在研究悬臂的存在是否会影响部分义齿缺失的种植治疗效果,包括对牙弓前部和后部区域的分析:方法:进行电子检索,纳入 1995 年至 2023 年 11 月间发表的原创文章。结果包括种植体存活率、患者满意度、机械并发症发生率以及种植体周围边缘骨质流失。两名工作人员代表独立审查了研究的有效性,从纳入的研究中提取证据,并进行了偏倚风险评估、综合证据评估和荟萃分析:九项研究符合我们的纳入标准。悬臂组的种植体存活率往往较低,而悬臂组的边缘骨流失率往往较高,但两者并无显著差异。有无悬臂对患者的满意度没有明显差异。此外,悬臂组的机械并发症发生率明显更高。根据前后区的分析,后区悬臂组的种植体存活率往往较低,而前区悬臂组种植体周围的边缘骨损失往往较高:结论:带有悬臂的种植体支持固定义齿不会对种植体存活率、边缘骨质流失和患者满意度产生负面影响。然而,悬臂组的机械并发症发生率明显增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Implant Dentistry
International Journal of Implant Dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
7.40%
发文量
53
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Implant Dentistry is a peer-reviewed open access journal published under the SpringerOpen brand. The journal is dedicated to promoting the exchange and discussion of all research areas relevant to implant dentistry in the form of systematic literature or invited reviews, prospective and retrospective clinical studies, clinical case reports, basic laboratory and animal research, and articles on material research and engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信