Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MRI in Differentiating Focal Nodular Hyperplasia from Hepatocellular Adenoma in Children.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Başak Erdemli Gürsel, Gökhan Öngen, Selman Candan, Nadide Başak Gülleroğlu, Betül Berrin Sevinir, Zeynep Yazıcı
{"title":"Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MRI in Differentiating Focal Nodular Hyperplasia from Hepatocellular Adenoma in Children.","authors":"Başak Erdemli Gürsel, Gökhan Öngen, Selman Candan, Nadide Başak Gülleroğlu, Betül Berrin Sevinir, Zeynep Yazıcı","doi":"10.1093/bjr/tqae222","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the diagnostic performance of Gd-EOB-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for distinguishing focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) from hepatocellular adenoma (HCA) in children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Twenty-two patients (6 with HCA and 16 with FNH) were retrospectively included in this study. After qualitative analyses of MRI, quantitative analyses were performed by calculating the relative signal intensity ratios (SIR) between lesion and liver parenchyma both on precontrast and hepatobiliary phase images. Two equations, SIRpost-pre and liver-to-lesion contrast enhancement ratio (LLCER), using both SIRs of precontrast and hepatobiliary phase (HBP) imaging together were also calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most distinguishing non-contrast-enhanced MRI feature of HCA was intralesional fat since all HCA contained fat but none of FNHs. All FNHs were iso- or hyperintense relative to the adjacent liver on HBP images, but all HCAs except one were hypointense. The mean SIRpost-pre and LLCER of FNH were significantly higher than that of HCA (p < 0,001). SIRpost-pre and LLCER provided sensitivity and specificity values of 100%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although intralesional fat is a strong discriminative feature for distinguishing between HCA and FNH, qualitative properties of these lesions may not be enough for confident diagnosis. Gd-EOB uptake in the HBP provides high diagnostic accuracy, but overlap can be seen. SIRpost-pre and LLCER overcome the difficulties and have the best sensitivity and specificity.</p><p><strong>Advances in knowledge: </strong>Although there are many similar studies in adult group, this is one of the rare studies that will contribute to the literature in the pediatric group.</p>","PeriodicalId":9306,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjr/tqae222","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the diagnostic performance of Gd-EOB-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for distinguishing focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH) from hepatocellular adenoma (HCA) in children.

Methods: Twenty-two patients (6 with HCA and 16 with FNH) were retrospectively included in this study. After qualitative analyses of MRI, quantitative analyses were performed by calculating the relative signal intensity ratios (SIR) between lesion and liver parenchyma both on precontrast and hepatobiliary phase images. Two equations, SIRpost-pre and liver-to-lesion contrast enhancement ratio (LLCER), using both SIRs of precontrast and hepatobiliary phase (HBP) imaging together were also calculated.

Results: The most distinguishing non-contrast-enhanced MRI feature of HCA was intralesional fat since all HCA contained fat but none of FNHs. All FNHs were iso- or hyperintense relative to the adjacent liver on HBP images, but all HCAs except one were hypointense. The mean SIRpost-pre and LLCER of FNH were significantly higher than that of HCA (p < 0,001). SIRpost-pre and LLCER provided sensitivity and specificity values of 100%.

Conclusion: Although intralesional fat is a strong discriminative feature for distinguishing between HCA and FNH, qualitative properties of these lesions may not be enough for confident diagnosis. Gd-EOB uptake in the HBP provides high diagnostic accuracy, but overlap can be seen. SIRpost-pre and LLCER overcome the difficulties and have the best sensitivity and specificity.

Advances in knowledge: Although there are many similar studies in adult group, this is one of the rare studies that will contribute to the literature in the pediatric group.

钆醋酸增强核磁共振成像在鉴别儿童肝细胞腺瘤和局灶性结节性增生症中的应用
目的研究 Gd-EOB 增强磁共振成像(MRI)在区分儿童局灶性结节增生(FNH)和肝细胞腺瘤(HCA)方面的诊断性能:本研究回顾性纳入了 22 名患者(6 名 HCA 患者和 16 名 FNH 患者)。在对核磁共振成像进行定性分析后,通过计算对比前和肝胆相图像上病变与肝实质之间的相对信号强度比(SIR)进行定量分析。此外,还利用对比前和肝胆相(HBP)成像的相对信号强度比(SIR)计算了后-前和肝-病灶对比增强比(LLCER)两个方程:HCA最显著的非造影剂增强 MRI 特征是区内脂肪,因为所有 HCA 都含有脂肪,而 FNHs 却不含脂肪。在 HBP 图像上,所有 FNH 相对于邻近肝脏呈等或高密度,但除一个 HCA 外,所有 HCA 均呈低密度。FNH的平均SIRpost-pre和LLCER均明显高于HCA(p 结论:FNH的平均SIRpost-pre和LLCER均明显高于HCA:虽然椎管内脂肪是区分 HCA 和 FNH 的一个强有力的特征,但这些病变的定性特征可能不足以做出可靠的诊断。HBP 中的 Gd-EOB 摄取具有很高的诊断准确性,但也会出现重叠。SIRpost-pre和LLCER克服了这些困难,具有最佳的灵敏度和特异性:尽管在成人组中有许多类似的研究,但这是为儿科组文献做出贡献的罕见研究之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
British Journal of Radiology
British Journal of Radiology 医学-核医学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.80%
发文量
330
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: BJR is the international research journal of the British Institute of Radiology and is the oldest scientific journal in the field of radiology and related sciences. Dating back to 1896, BJR’s history is radiology’s history, and the journal has featured some landmark papers such as the first description of Computed Tomography "Computerized transverse axial tomography" by Godfrey Hounsfield in 1973. A valuable historical resource, the complete BJR archive has been digitized from 1896. Quick Facts: - 2015 Impact Factor – 1.840 - Receipt to first decision – average of 6 weeks - Acceptance to online publication – average of 3 weeks - ISSN: 0007-1285 - eISSN: 1748-880X Open Access option
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信