Size and kinematics of the low-ionization broad emission line region from microlensing-induced line profile distortions in gravitationally lensed quasars

IF 5.4 2区 物理与天体物理 Q1 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Damien Hutsemékers, Dominique Sluse, Đorđe Savić
{"title":"Size and kinematics of the low-ionization broad emission line region from microlensing-induced line profile distortions in gravitationally lensed quasars","authors":"Damien Hutsemékers, Dominique Sluse, Đorđe Savić","doi":"10.1051/0004-6361/202452240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Microlensing-induced distortions of broad emission line profiles observed in the spectra of gravitationally lensed quasars can be used to probe the size, geometry, and kinematics of the broad-line region (BLR). To this end, single-epoch Mg II or H<i>α<i/> line profile distortions observed in five gravitationally lensed quasars, J1131-1231, J1226-0006, J1355-2257, J1339+1310, and HE0435-1223, have been compared with simulated ones. The simulations are based on three BLR models, a Keplerian disk (KD), an equatorial wind (EW), and a polar wind (PW), with different sizes, inclinations, and emissivities. The models that best reproduce the observed line profile distortions were identified using a Bayesian probabilistic approach. We find that the wide variety of observed line profile distortions can be reproduced with microlensing-induced distortions of line profiles generated by our BLR models. For J1131, J1226, and HE0435, the most likely model for the Mg II and H<i>α<i/> BLRs is either KD or EW, depending on the orientation of the magnification map with respect to the BLR axis. This shows that the line profile distortions depend on the position and orientation of the isovelocity parts of the BLR with respect to the caustic network, and not only on their different effective sizes. For the Mg II BLRs in J1355 and J1339, the EW model is preferred. For all objects, the PW model has a lower probability. As for the high-ionization C IV BLR, we conclude that disk geometries with kinematics dominated by either Keplerian rotation or equatorial outflow best reproduce the microlensing effects on the low-ionization Mg II and H<i>α<i/> emission line profiles. The half-light radii of the Mg II and H<i>α<i/> BLRs are measured in the range of 3 to 25 light-days. We also confirm that the size of the region emitting the low-ionization lines is larger than the region emitting the high-ionization lines, with a factor of four measured between the sizes of the Mg II and C IV emitting regions in J1339. Unexpectedly, the microlensing BLR radii of the Mg II and H<i>α<i/> BLRs are found to be systematically below the radius-luminosity (<i>R<i/> − <i>L<i/>) relations derived from reverberation mapping, confirming that the intrinsic dispersion of the BLR radii with respect to the <i>R<i/> − <i>L<i/> relations is large, but also revealing a selection bias that affects microlensing-based BLR size measurements. This bias arises from the fact that, if microlensing-induced line profile distortions are observed in a lensed quasar, the BLR radius should be comparable to the microlensing Einstein radius, which varies only weakly with typical lens and source redshifts.","PeriodicalId":8571,"journal":{"name":"Astronomy & Astrophysics","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Astronomy & Astrophysics","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202452240","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Microlensing-induced distortions of broad emission line profiles observed in the spectra of gravitationally lensed quasars can be used to probe the size, geometry, and kinematics of the broad-line region (BLR). To this end, single-epoch Mg II or Hα line profile distortions observed in five gravitationally lensed quasars, J1131-1231, J1226-0006, J1355-2257, J1339+1310, and HE0435-1223, have been compared with simulated ones. The simulations are based on three BLR models, a Keplerian disk (KD), an equatorial wind (EW), and a polar wind (PW), with different sizes, inclinations, and emissivities. The models that best reproduce the observed line profile distortions were identified using a Bayesian probabilistic approach. We find that the wide variety of observed line profile distortions can be reproduced with microlensing-induced distortions of line profiles generated by our BLR models. For J1131, J1226, and HE0435, the most likely model for the Mg II and Hα BLRs is either KD or EW, depending on the orientation of the magnification map with respect to the BLR axis. This shows that the line profile distortions depend on the position and orientation of the isovelocity parts of the BLR with respect to the caustic network, and not only on their different effective sizes. For the Mg II BLRs in J1355 and J1339, the EW model is preferred. For all objects, the PW model has a lower probability. As for the high-ionization C IV BLR, we conclude that disk geometries with kinematics dominated by either Keplerian rotation or equatorial outflow best reproduce the microlensing effects on the low-ionization Mg II and Hα emission line profiles. The half-light radii of the Mg II and Hα BLRs are measured in the range of 3 to 25 light-days. We also confirm that the size of the region emitting the low-ionization lines is larger than the region emitting the high-ionization lines, with a factor of four measured between the sizes of the Mg II and C IV emitting regions in J1339. Unexpectedly, the microlensing BLR radii of the Mg II and Hα BLRs are found to be systematically below the radius-luminosity (R − L) relations derived from reverberation mapping, confirming that the intrinsic dispersion of the BLR radii with respect to the R − L relations is large, but also revealing a selection bias that affects microlensing-based BLR size measurements. This bias arises from the fact that, if microlensing-induced line profile distortions are observed in a lensed quasar, the BLR radius should be comparable to the microlensing Einstein radius, which varies only weakly with typical lens and source redshifts.
引力透镜类星体中微透镜诱发的线剖面畸变所产生的低电离宽发射线区的大小和运动学特征
在引力透镜类星体光谱中观测到的宽发射线剖面微透镜诱发的扭曲可以用来探测宽线区(BLR)的大小、几何形状和运动学。为此,我们将在五颗引力透镜类星(J1131-1231、J1226-0006、J1355-2257、J1339+1310 和 HE0435-1223)中观测到的单波长 Mg II 或 Hα 线剖面变形与模拟的进行了比较。模拟基于三种 BLR 模型,即开普勒盘(KD)、赤道风(EW)和极地风(PW),它们的大小、倾角和发射率各不相同。利用贝叶斯概率方法确定了最能再现观测到的线剖面畸变的模型。我们发现,我们的 BLR 模型生成的微透镜引起的线剖面扭曲可以再现观测到的各种线剖面扭曲。对于 J1131、J1226 和 HE0435,Mg II 和 Hα BLR 最可能的模型是 KD 或 EW,这取决于放大图相对于 BLR 轴的方向。这表明,线剖面畸变取决于BLR相对于苛性网络的等速部分的位置和方向,而不仅仅取决于它们不同的有效尺寸。对于 J1355 和 J1339 中的 Mg II BLR,EW 模式更可取。对于所有天体,PW模型的概率都较低。至于高电离 C IV BLR,我们的结论是,以开普勒自转或赤道外流为主的圆盘几何学最能再现微透镜对低电离 Mg II 和 Hα 辐射线剖面的影响。测量到的 Mg II 和 Hα BLR 的半光半径在 3 到 25 光天之间。我们还证实,发射低电离线区域的大小大于发射高电离线区域的大小,在 J1339 中测量到的 Mg II 和 C IV 发射区域的大小相差四倍。意想不到的是,Mg II 和 Hα BLR 的微透镜 BLR 半径被发现系统地低于从混响绘图中得出的半径-光度(R - L)关系,这证实了 BLR 半径相对于 R - L 关系的内在离散性很大,同时也揭示了影响基于微透镜的 BLR 尺寸测量的选择偏差。产生这种偏差的原因是,如果在透镜类星体中观测到微透镜引起的线剖面畸变,那么BLR半径应该与微透镜爱因斯坦半径相当,而爱因斯坦半径只随典型透镜和源红移的变化而微弱变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Astronomy & Astrophysics
Astronomy & Astrophysics 地学天文-天文与天体物理
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
27.70%
发文量
2105
审稿时长
1-2 weeks
期刊介绍: Astronomy & Astrophysics is an international Journal that publishes papers on all aspects of astronomy and astrophysics (theoretical, observational, and instrumental) independently of the techniques used to obtain the results.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信