AI Technologies and International Relations: Do We Need New Analytical Frameworks?

IF 0.7 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE
RUSI Journal Pub Date : 2024-08-29 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1080/03071847.2024.2392394
Ingvild Bode
{"title":"AI Technologies and International Relations: Do We Need New Analytical Frameworks?","authors":"Ingvild Bode","doi":"10.1080/03071847.2024.2392394","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>AI technologies are drawing increasing attention among international relations (IR) scholars. Ingvild Bode reviews this literature through considering, in particular, the extent to which such studies continue to use or expand on well-traded analytical frameworks. She finds that scholarship on AI in IR can look back at a longer-than-expected trajectory and centres on four key themes: the balance of power; disinformation; governance; and ethics. Much of this literature works with well-established IR conceptualisations, while studies across three emerging themes - (re)conceptualising technology, beyond the AI arms race, and unpacking relevant actors - push and expand established disciplinary frameworks. ◼.</p>","PeriodicalId":51795,"journal":{"name":"RUSI Journal","volume":"169 5","pages":"66-74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11575148/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RUSI Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03071847.2024.2392394","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AI technologies are drawing increasing attention among international relations (IR) scholars. Ingvild Bode reviews this literature through considering, in particular, the extent to which such studies continue to use or expand on well-traded analytical frameworks. She finds that scholarship on AI in IR can look back at a longer-than-expected trajectory and centres on four key themes: the balance of power; disinformation; governance; and ethics. Much of this literature works with well-established IR conceptualisations, while studies across three emerging themes - (re)conceptualising technology, beyond the AI arms race, and unpacking relevant actors - push and expand established disciplinary frameworks. ◼.

人工智能技术与国际关系:我们需要新的分析框架吗?
人工智能技术越来越受到国际关系(IR)学者的关注。英维尔德-博德(Ingvild Bode)对这些文献进行了回顾,特别是考虑了这些研究在多大程度上继续使用或扩展了成熟的分析框架。她发现,关于人工智能在国际关系中的应用的学术研究可以回顾比预期更长的轨迹,并集中在四个关键主题上:力量平衡、虚假信息、治理和伦理。这些文献中的大部分都采用了成熟的国际关系概念,而对三个新兴主题的研究--(重新)构思技术、超越人工智能军备竞赛以及解读相关行为者--则推动并扩展了既有的学科框架。◼.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
RUSI Journal
RUSI Journal POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
39
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信