Efficacy and safety of RET-TKI in advanced RET-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer in China: a real-world retrospective chart review.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
Siyu Lei, Linyan Tian, Lu Yang, Yaning Yang, Junling Li, Xingsheng Hu, Xuezhi Hao, Haiyan Xu, Yan Wang
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of RET-TKI in advanced RET-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer in China: a real-world retrospective chart review.","authors":"Siyu Lei, Linyan Tian, Lu Yang, Yaning Yang, Junling Li, Xingsheng Hu, Xuezhi Hao, Haiyan Xu, Yan Wang","doi":"10.1186/s12885-024-13155-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Selective RET inhibitors have been approved by the Chinese government for the treatment of RET-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer. This study aimed to illustrate the efficacy and safety of selective RET inhibitors in a real-world clinical context in China.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring RET rearrangement and receiving RET tyrosine kinase inhibitors (RET-TKI) in the real world were enrolled in this retrospective study. Clinical data, including baseline clinicopathological information, efficacy parameters such as objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse events (AEs), were collected from the electronic medical record system. The pattern of treatment failure of first-line RET-TKI was also described.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-one patients were enrolled in this study. RET-TKI induced an ORR of 73.1% and a median PFS (mPFS) of 22.7 months (95%CI, 11.7-33.7) in the first-line setting. The ORR and mPFS were 58.3% and 17.7 months (95%CI, 9.1-26.2), 55.6% and 14.7 months (95%CI, 12.6-16.8) in the second-line and later-line settings, respectively. No significant difference was observed among different application lines with respect to the ORR (P = 0.534) or PFS (P = 0.795). In the first-line setting, RET-TKI significantly prolonged PFS compared to other regimens including chemotherapy-based regimens, multikinase inhibitors and other systemic regimens without chemotherapy (P < 0.05). Poor ECOG performance status was related to shorter PFS (P = 0.018). The most common AEs of grade 3 or worse were a decreased neutrophil count (11.4%) and anemia (11.4%). No new AEs or grade 5 AEs were observed. Brain metastasis was one of the most common patterns of treatment failure. In patients with baseline brain metastasis, the intracranial ORR was 50%, and the DCR was 100%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RET-TKI had favorable efficacy and safety in real-world contexts in China and should be considered the preferred choice for first-line treatment in RET-rearranged NSCLC patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":9131,"journal":{"name":"BMC Cancer","volume":"24 1","pages":"1427"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11577726/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-024-13155-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Selective RET inhibitors have been approved by the Chinese government for the treatment of RET-rearranged non-small cell lung cancer. This study aimed to illustrate the efficacy and safety of selective RET inhibitors in a real-world clinical context in China.

Methods: Patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring RET rearrangement and receiving RET tyrosine kinase inhibitors (RET-TKI) in the real world were enrolled in this retrospective study. Clinical data, including baseline clinicopathological information, efficacy parameters such as objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse events (AEs), were collected from the electronic medical record system. The pattern of treatment failure of first-line RET-TKI was also described.

Results: Fifty-one patients were enrolled in this study. RET-TKI induced an ORR of 73.1% and a median PFS (mPFS) of 22.7 months (95%CI, 11.7-33.7) in the first-line setting. The ORR and mPFS were 58.3% and 17.7 months (95%CI, 9.1-26.2), 55.6% and 14.7 months (95%CI, 12.6-16.8) in the second-line and later-line settings, respectively. No significant difference was observed among different application lines with respect to the ORR (P = 0.534) or PFS (P = 0.795). In the first-line setting, RET-TKI significantly prolonged PFS compared to other regimens including chemotherapy-based regimens, multikinase inhibitors and other systemic regimens without chemotherapy (P < 0.05). Poor ECOG performance status was related to shorter PFS (P = 0.018). The most common AEs of grade 3 or worse were a decreased neutrophil count (11.4%) and anemia (11.4%). No new AEs or grade 5 AEs were observed. Brain metastasis was one of the most common patterns of treatment failure. In patients with baseline brain metastasis, the intracranial ORR was 50%, and the DCR was 100%.

Conclusions: RET-TKI had favorable efficacy and safety in real-world contexts in China and should be considered the preferred choice for first-line treatment in RET-rearranged NSCLC patients.

RET-TKI在中国晚期RET重组非小细胞肺癌中的疗效和安全性:真实世界回顾性图表回顾。
背景:中国政府已批准选择性RET抑制剂用于治疗RET重组非小细胞肺癌。本研究旨在说明选择性RET抑制剂在中国实际临床环境中的疗效和安全性:这项回顾性研究招募了携带RET重排并接受RET酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(RET-TKI)治疗的局部晚期或转移性非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者。临床数据包括基线临床病理信息、客观反应率(ORR)和无进展生存期(PFS)等疗效参数以及不良事件(AEs),均从电子病历系统中收集。此外,还描述了一线RET-TKI治疗失败的模式:本研究共纳入51例患者。在一线治疗中,RET-TKI的ORR为73.1%,中位PFS(mPFS)为22.7个月(95%CI,11.7-33.7)。在二线和后线治疗中,ORR 和 mPFS 分别为 58.3% 和 17.7 个月(95%CI,9.1-26.2),55.6% 和 14.7 个月(95%CI,12.6-16.8)。在 ORR(P = 0.534)或 PFS(P = 0.795)方面,不同应用线之间未观察到明显差异。在一线治疗中,与其他方案(包括化疗方案、多激酶抑制剂和其他无化疗的全身方案)相比,RET-TKI能明显延长患者的生存期(P 结论:RET-TKI在一线治疗中具有良好的疗效:在中国的实际治疗中,RET-TKI具有良好的疗效和安全性,应被视为RET重组NSCLC患者一线治疗的首选方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Cancer
BMC Cancer 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.60%
发文量
1204
审稿时长
6.8 months
期刊介绍: BMC Cancer is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of cancer research, including the pathophysiology, prevention, diagnosis and treatment of cancers. The journal welcomes submissions concerning molecular and cellular biology, genetics, epidemiology, and clinical trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信