Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy and Endocrine Therapy for Oestrogen Receptor Positive Breast Cancers: The Neo-RT Feasibility Study.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY
S V Lightowlers, A Machin, R Woitek, E Provenzano, I Allajbeu, W Al Sarakbi, N Demiris, P Forouhi, F J Gilbert, A M Kirby, C Towns, N Somaiah, C E Coles
{"title":"Neoadjuvant Radiotherapy and Endocrine Therapy for Oestrogen Receptor Positive Breast Cancers: The Neo-RT Feasibility Study.","authors":"S V Lightowlers, A Machin, R Woitek, E Provenzano, I Allajbeu, W Al Sarakbi, N Demiris, P Forouhi, F J Gilbert, A M Kirby, C Towns, N Somaiah, C E Coles","doi":"10.1016/j.clon.2024.103669","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>To establish the safety and feasibility of delivering neoadjuvant radiotherapy and endocrine therapy for oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancers with palpable size 20mm or greater, for which radiotherapy might facilitate more conservative surgery.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A single-arm feasibility study was conducted. Patients received whole breast radiotherapy with or without radiotherapy to nodal areas. Dose/fractionation was 40Gy in 15 fractions over 3 weeks, with or without either a simultaneous integrated boost to 48Gy or sequential boost to the tumour bed. This was followed by endocrine treatment for 20 weeks, then surgery. The primary endpoint of the study was the proportion of patients successfully completing neoadjuvant radiotherapy and endocrine treatment followed by breast surgery. Response and toxicity endpoints including mastectomy rate, peri/postoperative complications, and pathological response were also evaluated. The primary analysis is descriptive. The study regimen would be considered feasible if more than 70% of patients completed treatment, while it might not be considered feasible if less than 50% did so. With a one-sided 5% significance level and 80% power, a maximum of 43 patients would be required to detect a rate of ≤50% vs ≥70%.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>14 patients were recruited out of the planned 43. Due to slow recruitment, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic, the decision was made to stop the trial in October 2021. One registered patient was found to be ineligible before starting treatment. 13/13 patients (100%, 90% CI: 75.3%, 100%) who received any trial treatment successfully completed all trial treatments. The lower bound of the Clopper-Pearson (exact) 90% confidence interval was 79%, indicating that the primary endpoint would have been met if the planned recruitment had been achieved. 3/13 patients underwent mastectomy. 7/13 had more conservative surgery than had been planned at baseline. 4/13 patients experienced any peri/postoperative complication. The only acute radiotherapy toxicities reported were grade 1/2 dermatitis and grade 1 fatigue. Long-term breast outcomes were clinician assessed as none/mild at all timepoints in 12/13 patients. All tumours showed evidence of some pathological response to treatment, but none had a pathological complete response.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This treatment schedule is likely feasible. It is difficult to draw strong conclusions on safety/toxicity given the small numbers, but these seem in keeping with other recent reports of neoadjuvant breast radiotherapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":10403,"journal":{"name":"Clinical oncology","volume":"37 ","pages":"103669"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clon.2024.103669","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: To establish the safety and feasibility of delivering neoadjuvant radiotherapy and endocrine therapy for oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancers with palpable size 20mm or greater, for which radiotherapy might facilitate more conservative surgery.

Materials and methods: A single-arm feasibility study was conducted. Patients received whole breast radiotherapy with or without radiotherapy to nodal areas. Dose/fractionation was 40Gy in 15 fractions over 3 weeks, with or without either a simultaneous integrated boost to 48Gy or sequential boost to the tumour bed. This was followed by endocrine treatment for 20 weeks, then surgery. The primary endpoint of the study was the proportion of patients successfully completing neoadjuvant radiotherapy and endocrine treatment followed by breast surgery. Response and toxicity endpoints including mastectomy rate, peri/postoperative complications, and pathological response were also evaluated. The primary analysis is descriptive. The study regimen would be considered feasible if more than 70% of patients completed treatment, while it might not be considered feasible if less than 50% did so. With a one-sided 5% significance level and 80% power, a maximum of 43 patients would be required to detect a rate of ≤50% vs ≥70%.

Results: 14 patients were recruited out of the planned 43. Due to slow recruitment, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic, the decision was made to stop the trial in October 2021. One registered patient was found to be ineligible before starting treatment. 13/13 patients (100%, 90% CI: 75.3%, 100%) who received any trial treatment successfully completed all trial treatments. The lower bound of the Clopper-Pearson (exact) 90% confidence interval was 79%, indicating that the primary endpoint would have been met if the planned recruitment had been achieved. 3/13 patients underwent mastectomy. 7/13 had more conservative surgery than had been planned at baseline. 4/13 patients experienced any peri/postoperative complication. The only acute radiotherapy toxicities reported were grade 1/2 dermatitis and grade 1 fatigue. Long-term breast outcomes were clinician assessed as none/mild at all timepoints in 12/13 patients. All tumours showed evidence of some pathological response to treatment, but none had a pathological complete response.

Conclusion: This treatment schedule is likely feasible. It is difficult to draw strong conclusions on safety/toxicity given the small numbers, but these seem in keeping with other recent reports of neoadjuvant breast radiotherapy.

雌激素受体阳性乳腺癌的新辅助放疗和内分泌治疗:新辅助放疗可行性研究》。
目的:确定对雌激素受体阳性、可触及大小为20毫米或更大的乳腺癌进行新辅助放疗和内分泌治疗的安全性和可行性:进行了一项单臂可行性研究。患者接受全乳腺放疗,同时接受或不接受结节区放疗。剂量/分次为40Gy,分15次,疗程3周,可选择是否同时进行48Gy的综合增强或对肿瘤床进行连续增强。随后进行为期20周的内分泌治疗,然后进行手术。研究的主要终点是成功完成新辅助放疗和内分泌治疗后再进行乳腺手术的患者比例。研究还评估了反应和毒性终点,包括乳房切除率、围手术期/术后并发症和病理反应。主要分析是描述性的。如果超过 70% 的患者完成了治疗,研究方案就被认为是可行的,而如果只有不到 50% 的患者完成了治疗,研究方案就可能被认为是不可行的。在单侧 5%显著性水平和 80% 功率下,最多需要 43 名患者才能检测到≤50% 与≥70% 的比率:计划招募 43 名患者,实际招募了 14 名。由于招募缓慢,尤其是在 COVID-19 大流行期间,决定于 2021 年 10 月停止试验。一名注册患者在开始治疗前被发现不符合条件。接受任何试验治疗的 13/13 名患者(100%,90% CI:75.3%,100%)成功完成了所有试验治疗。Clopper-Pearson(精确)90%置信区间的下限为79%,表明如果实现了计划招募,主要终点就会达到。3/13的患者接受了乳房切除术。7/13的患者接受了比基线计划更保守的手术。4/13的患者出现了任何术前/术后并发症。报告的急性放疗毒性反应仅有1/2级皮炎和1级疲劳。12/13例患者在所有时间点的长期乳腺疗效均被临床医生评估为无/轻度。所有肿瘤都显示出对治疗有一定的病理反应,但没有一个肿瘤出现病理完全反应:结论:这种治疗方案可能是可行的。结论:这种治疗方案可能是可行的,但由于患者人数较少,很难对其安全性/毒性得出有力的结论,但这些结论似乎与近期其他关于新辅助乳腺放射治疗的报告一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical oncology
Clinical oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.80%
发文量
332
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Oncology is an International cancer journal covering all aspects of the clinical management of cancer patients, reflecting a multidisciplinary approach to therapy. Papers, editorials and reviews are published on all types of malignant disease embracing, pathology, diagnosis and treatment, including radiotherapy, chemotherapy, surgery, combined modality treatment and palliative care. Research and review papers covering epidemiology, radiobiology, radiation physics, tumour biology, and immunology are also published, together with letters to the editor, case reports and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信