Outpatient Simultaneous Bilateral Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasties: Safe with Positive Patient-Reported Outcomes.

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
Andrew Steffensmeier, Elijah Auch, Henry Haley, Kevin Farley, Donald Knapke
{"title":"Outpatient Simultaneous Bilateral Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasties: Safe with Positive Patient-Reported Outcomes.","authors":"Andrew Steffensmeier, Elijah Auch, Henry Haley, Kevin Farley, Donald Knapke","doi":"10.1016/j.arth.2024.11.030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Bilateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (bUKA) done on the same day (simultaneous) (sbUKA) has been shown to be safe and cost-effective in hospital settings. Given the popularity and increased use of ambulatory surgery centers (ASC), the purpose of this study was to compare safety and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of sbUKA done at the hospital versus ASC.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive primary sbUKAs over 5 years done by a single surgeon were retrospectively collected. Surgeries were done at a hospital or ASC. Baseline demographics, intraoperative and postoperative results, and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS-jr) patient-reported outcome scores were collected between the two groups. Groups were compared utilizing Student's unpaired t-tests for continuous variables and χ2 tests for categorical variables.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 146 patients (292 knees) who underwent sbUKA, 90 were done at a hospital, and 56 were done at an ASC. Length of stay was longer (53 versus five hours, P < 0.001), and operative time was longer (82 versus 68 minutes, P < 0.001) in the hospital group. In the hospital group, 11 (12.2%) were discharged to subacute rehab (SAR) and nine (10%) returned to the emergency department (ED) within 120 days compared to zero patients in the ASC group (P = 0.007 and 0.015, respectively). There was no significant difference in the final range of motion nor KOOS-jr scores postoperatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Outpatient SbUKA can safely be performed in selected patients. There is no difference in functional outcomes between outpatient and inpatient SbUKA.</p>","PeriodicalId":51077,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Arthroplasty","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Arthroplasty","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2024.11.030","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Bilateral unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (bUKA) done on the same day (simultaneous) (sbUKA) has been shown to be safe and cost-effective in hospital settings. Given the popularity and increased use of ambulatory surgery centers (ASC), the purpose of this study was to compare safety and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of sbUKA done at the hospital versus ASC.

Methods: Consecutive primary sbUKAs over 5 years done by a single surgeon were retrospectively collected. Surgeries were done at a hospital or ASC. Baseline demographics, intraoperative and postoperative results, and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS-jr) patient-reported outcome scores were collected between the two groups. Groups were compared utilizing Student's unpaired t-tests for continuous variables and χ2 tests for categorical variables.

Results: Of 146 patients (292 knees) who underwent sbUKA, 90 were done at a hospital, and 56 were done at an ASC. Length of stay was longer (53 versus five hours, P < 0.001), and operative time was longer (82 versus 68 minutes, P < 0.001) in the hospital group. In the hospital group, 11 (12.2%) were discharged to subacute rehab (SAR) and nine (10%) returned to the emergency department (ED) within 120 days compared to zero patients in the ASC group (P = 0.007 and 0.015, respectively). There was no significant difference in the final range of motion nor KOOS-jr scores postoperatively.

Conclusion: Outpatient SbUKA can safely be performed in selected patients. There is no difference in functional outcomes between outpatient and inpatient SbUKA.

门诊同步双侧单室膝关节置换术:安全且患者报告结果良好
背景:在医院环境中,当天(同时)完成的双侧单髁膝关节置换术(sbUKA)已被证明是安全且具有成本效益的。鉴于非卧床手术中心(ASC)的普及和使用的增加,本研究的目的是比较在医院和非卧床手术中心进行的膝关节置换术(sbUKA)的安全性和患者报告的结果指标(PROMs):方法:回顾性地收集了5年来由一名外科医生完成的连续性初级sbUKA手术。手术在医院或 ASC 进行。收集了两组患者的基线人口统计学资料、术中和术后结果以及膝关节损伤和骨关节炎关节置换术结果评分(KOOS-jr)患者报告结果评分。对连续变量采用学生非配对 t 检验,对分类变量采用 χ2 检验:在146名接受sbUKA的患者(292个膝关节)中,90名在医院完成,56名在ASC完成。医院组的住院时间更长(53小时对5小时,P<0.001),手术时间更长(82分钟对68分钟,P<0.001)。在医院组中,有11人(12.2%)在120天内出院到亚急性康复中心(SAR),有9人(10%)返回急诊科(ED),而在ASC组中没有患者(P = 0.007和0.015,分别为0.007和0.015)。术后最终活动范围和KOOS-jr评分无明显差异:结论:SbUKA可以在门诊安全地为选定的患者实施。结论:门诊 SbUKA 可安全地用于特定患者,门诊 SbUKA 和住院 SbUKA 在功能结果上没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Arthroplasty
Journal of Arthroplasty 医学-整形外科
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
734
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Arthroplasty brings together the clinical and scientific foundations for joint replacement. This peer-reviewed journal publishes original research and manuscripts of the highest quality from all areas relating to joint replacement or the treatment of its complications, including those dealing with clinical series and experience, prosthetic design, biomechanics, biomaterials, metallurgy, biologic response to arthroplasty materials in vivo and in vitro.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信