Cardiovascular outcomes among giant cell myocarditis compared with cardiac sarcoidosis: A propensity score-matched analysis.

Vikash Jaiswal, Muhammad Hanif, Yusra Mashkoor, Aanchal Sawhney, Tushar Kumar, Juveriya Yasmeen, F N U Sundas, Jishanth Mattumpuram, Adrija Hajra, Carl J Lavie, Dhrubajyoti Bandyopadhyay
{"title":"Cardiovascular outcomes among giant cell myocarditis compared with cardiac sarcoidosis: A propensity score-matched analysis.","authors":"Vikash Jaiswal, Muhammad Hanif, Yusra Mashkoor, Aanchal Sawhney, Tushar Kumar, Juveriya Yasmeen, F N U Sundas, Jishanth Mattumpuram, Adrija Hajra, Carl J Lavie, Dhrubajyoti Bandyopadhyay","doi":"10.1016/j.pcad.2024.11.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Giant cell myocarditis (GCM) and cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) are rare inflammatory diseases of the myocardium with poor prognosis. Cardiovascular disease outcomes among both diseases have not been well studied with limited literature.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aims to investigate the cardiovascular outcomes among patients with GCM and CS.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We queried the TriNeTX Global Collaborative Network for adult patients with giant cell myocarditis and cardiac sarcoidosis between January 2000 to May 2023 and created two groups: one with giant cell myocarditis and second with cardiac sarcoidosis. Both the groups were followed for 6 months and 12 months.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>After propensity score matched analysis (PSM), among the 4804 patients (2402 patients in each group), the mean age of patients was 57.1 and 57.6 years in GCM and CS groups, respectively. PSM analysis showed that primary outcome i.e., all-cause mortality was significantly higher in GCM group both after 6 months [relative risk (RR) 2.33, 95 % confidence interval (CI): 1.64-3.30, p < 0.01] and 1 year follow up [RR, 1.54 (95 % CI: 1.20-1.98), p < 0.01] as compared with CS group. However, secondary outcomes i.e., heart failure (HF) at 6 month (RR 0.66, 95 % CI: 0.52-0.85, p < 0.01), and at 1 year (RR 0.60, 95 % CI: 0.49-0.73, p < 0.01), ventricular tachycardia (VT) at 6 months (RR 0.34, 95 % CI: 0.25-0.46, p < 0.01), and at 1 year (RR 0.32, 95 % CI: 0.25-0.41, p < 0.01), atrioventricular (AV) node block at 6 month (RR 0.45, 95 % CI: 0.33-0.61, p < 0.01), and at 1 year (RR 0.43, 95 % CI: 0.34-0.55, p < 0.01), and atrial flutter and fibrillation (AF) at 6 months (RR 0.67, 95 % CI: 0.48-0.94, p = 0.02), and at 1 year (RR 0.59, 95 % CI: 0.45-0.76, p < 0.01) were found significantly lower in GCM group as compared to CS group. On the other hand, heart transplant incidence was comparable between both the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that GCM patients have high risk of mortality and lower risk of HF, VT, AV node block, and AF when compared with CS.</p>","PeriodicalId":94178,"journal":{"name":"Progress in cardiovascular diseases","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in cardiovascular diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcad.2024.11.002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Giant cell myocarditis (GCM) and cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) are rare inflammatory diseases of the myocardium with poor prognosis. Cardiovascular disease outcomes among both diseases have not been well studied with limited literature.

Objective: This study aims to investigate the cardiovascular outcomes among patients with GCM and CS.

Method: We queried the TriNeTX Global Collaborative Network for adult patients with giant cell myocarditis and cardiac sarcoidosis between January 2000 to May 2023 and created two groups: one with giant cell myocarditis and second with cardiac sarcoidosis. Both the groups were followed for 6 months and 12 months.

Result: After propensity score matched analysis (PSM), among the 4804 patients (2402 patients in each group), the mean age of patients was 57.1 and 57.6 years in GCM and CS groups, respectively. PSM analysis showed that primary outcome i.e., all-cause mortality was significantly higher in GCM group both after 6 months [relative risk (RR) 2.33, 95 % confidence interval (CI): 1.64-3.30, p < 0.01] and 1 year follow up [RR, 1.54 (95 % CI: 1.20-1.98), p < 0.01] as compared with CS group. However, secondary outcomes i.e., heart failure (HF) at 6 month (RR 0.66, 95 % CI: 0.52-0.85, p < 0.01), and at 1 year (RR 0.60, 95 % CI: 0.49-0.73, p < 0.01), ventricular tachycardia (VT) at 6 months (RR 0.34, 95 % CI: 0.25-0.46, p < 0.01), and at 1 year (RR 0.32, 95 % CI: 0.25-0.41, p < 0.01), atrioventricular (AV) node block at 6 month (RR 0.45, 95 % CI: 0.33-0.61, p < 0.01), and at 1 year (RR 0.43, 95 % CI: 0.34-0.55, p < 0.01), and atrial flutter and fibrillation (AF) at 6 months (RR 0.67, 95 % CI: 0.48-0.94, p = 0.02), and at 1 year (RR 0.59, 95 % CI: 0.45-0.76, p < 0.01) were found significantly lower in GCM group as compared to CS group. On the other hand, heart transplant incidence was comparable between both the groups.

Conclusion: These findings suggest that GCM patients have high risk of mortality and lower risk of HF, VT, AV node block, and AF when compared with CS.

巨细胞心肌炎与心脏肉样瘤病的心血管预后比较:倾向评分匹配分析
背景:巨细胞心肌炎(GCM)和心脏肉样瘤病(CS)是罕见的心肌炎性疾病,预后不良。关于这两种疾病的心血管疾病预后的研究还不多,文献也很有限:本研究旨在调查 GCM 和 CS 患者的心血管疾病预后:我们在 TriNeTX 全球协作网络中查询了 2000 年 1 月至 2023 年 5 月期间巨细胞心肌炎和心脏肉样瘤病的成年患者,并创建了两组:一组为巨细胞心肌炎患者,另一组为心脏肉样瘤病患者。两组患者分别接受了 6 个月和 12 个月的随访:结果:经过倾向得分匹配分析(PSM),在 4804 名患者(每组 2402 名)中,巨细胞性心肌炎组和心脏肉样瘤组患者的平均年龄分别为 57.1 岁和 57.6 岁。PSM 分析表明,6 个月后,GCM 组的主要结果(即全因死亡率)明显高于 CS 组[相对风险 (RR) 2.33,95% 置信区间 (CI):1.64-3.30,P 结论:GCM 组的死亡率明显高于 CS 组]:这些研究结果表明,与 CS 相比,GCM 患者的死亡风险较高,而发生 HF、VT、房室结阻滞和房颤的风险较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信