Quality of life among obstructive sleep apnoea patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of EQ-5D studies.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
P Shirisha, Bhavani Shankara Bagepally, S Sajith Kumar, Bhanupriya Raghu
{"title":"Quality of life among obstructive sleep apnoea patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of EQ-5D studies.","authors":"P Shirisha, Bhavani Shankara Bagepally, S Sajith Kumar, Bhanupriya Raghu","doi":"10.1007/s11136-024-03828-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Obstructive Sleep Apnoea (OSA) is a chronic condition which is associated with extreme daytime sleepiness, cognitive impairment, and other comorbidities and, hence, decreased quality of life (QoL). EQ-5D is one of the most widely used preference-based measures of QoL in patients with different diseases worldwide. This study aims to review the EQ-5D utility value of OSA across primary studies and perform a meta-analysis to derive pooled utility scores for OSA.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis of the EQ-5D scores of OSA patients adhering to PRISMA guidelines was conducted. Studies reporting EQ-5D utility scores among adult OSA patients were systematically searched across PubMed-Medline, Scopus, and Embase. Selected studies were systematically reviewed and we have assessed the studies for their quality. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effect model with subgroup analysis to explore heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The search yielded 9,121 articles, of which twenty-eight studies were included in the synthesis. The pooled mean EQ-5D utility score was 0.73 (0.69 to 0.78) with high heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup> = 99.6%). The pooled EQ-5D VAS score was 67.14 (63.97 to 70.32) with high heterogeneity (I<sup>2</sup> = 87.04%). Subgroup analyses indicated significant variability in utility scores across different countries, age groups, and disease severities. The variation of utility values for OSA was influenced by the characteristics of patients, the living environment, and the EQ-5D value set.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The synthesis revealed that the QoL is significantly lower in OSA, and the aggregated quantitative estimates of EQ-5D utility scores are essential inputs for economic evaluations.</p>","PeriodicalId":20748,"journal":{"name":"Quality of Life Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality of Life Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-024-03828-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Obstructive Sleep Apnoea (OSA) is a chronic condition which is associated with extreme daytime sleepiness, cognitive impairment, and other comorbidities and, hence, decreased quality of life (QoL). EQ-5D is one of the most widely used preference-based measures of QoL in patients with different diseases worldwide. This study aims to review the EQ-5D utility value of OSA across primary studies and perform a meta-analysis to derive pooled utility scores for OSA.

Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the EQ-5D scores of OSA patients adhering to PRISMA guidelines was conducted. Studies reporting EQ-5D utility scores among adult OSA patients were systematically searched across PubMed-Medline, Scopus, and Embase. Selected studies were systematically reviewed and we have assessed the studies for their quality. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effect model with subgroup analysis to explore heterogeneity.

Results: The search yielded 9,121 articles, of which twenty-eight studies were included in the synthesis. The pooled mean EQ-5D utility score was 0.73 (0.69 to 0.78) with high heterogeneity (I2 = 99.6%). The pooled EQ-5D VAS score was 67.14 (63.97 to 70.32) with high heterogeneity (I2 = 87.04%). Subgroup analyses indicated significant variability in utility scores across different countries, age groups, and disease severities. The variation of utility values for OSA was influenced by the characteristics of patients, the living environment, and the EQ-5D value set.

Conclusion: The synthesis revealed that the QoL is significantly lower in OSA, and the aggregated quantitative estimates of EQ-5D utility scores are essential inputs for economic evaluations.

阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停患者的生活质量:EQ-5D 研究的系统回顾和荟萃分析。
背景:阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)是一种慢性疾病,与白天极度嗜睡、认知障碍和其他合并症有关,因此会降低生活质量(QoL)。EQ-5D 是全球最广泛使用的基于偏好的 QoL 测量方法之一,适用于不同疾病的患者。本研究旨在回顾主要研究中有关 OSA 的 EQ-5D 实用价值,并进行荟萃分析以得出 OSA 的集合实用价值得分:方法:根据PRISMA指南,对OSA患者的EQ-5D评分进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析。我们在PubMed-Medline、Scopus和Embase中系统检索了报告成年OSA患者EQ-5D效用评分的研究。我们对所选研究进行了系统审查,并对研究质量进行了评估。采用随机效应模型进行了元分析,并进行了亚组分析以探讨异质性:结果:搜索结果显示有 9,121 篇文章,其中 28 项研究被纳入综合分析。汇总的 EQ-5D 实用性平均得分为 0.73(0.69 至 0.78),异质性较高(I2 = 99.6%)。汇总的 EQ-5D VAS 得分为 67.14(63.97 至 70.32),异质性较高(I2 = 87.04%)。亚组分析表明,不同国家、年龄组和疾病严重程度的效用值存在显著差异。OSA效用值的变化受患者特征、生活环境和EQ-5D值集的影响:综述显示,OSA 患者的 QoL 明显较低,EQ-5D 实用性评分的综合定量估计值是经济评估的重要输入。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Quality of Life Research
Quality of Life Research 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
8.60%
发文量
224
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Quality of Life Research is an international, multidisciplinary journal devoted to the rapid communication of original research, theoretical articles and methodological reports related to the field of quality of life, in all the health sciences. The journal also offers editorials, literature, book and software reviews, correspondence and abstracts of conferences. Quality of life has become a prominent issue in biometry, philosophy, social science, clinical medicine, health services and outcomes research. The journal''s scope reflects the wide application of quality of life assessment and research in the biological and social sciences. All original work is subject to peer review for originality, scientific quality and relevance to a broad readership. This is an official journal of the International Society of Quality of Life Research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信