Percutaneous and endoscopic transpapillary cholecystoduodenal stenting in acute cholecystitis-A viable long-term option in high-risk patients?

IF 2.9 2区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Dias Argandykov, Mohamad El Moheb, Ikemsinachi C Nzenwa, Sanjeeva P Kalva, Shams Iqbal, Sara Smolinski-Zhao, Kumar Krishnan, George C Velmahos, Charudutt Paranjape
{"title":"Percutaneous and endoscopic transpapillary cholecystoduodenal stenting in acute cholecystitis-A viable long-term option in high-risk patients?","authors":"Dias Argandykov, Mohamad El Moheb, Ikemsinachi C Nzenwa, Sanjeeva P Kalva, Shams Iqbal, Sara Smolinski-Zhao, Kumar Krishnan, George C Velmahos, Charudutt Paranjape","doi":"10.1097/TA.0000000000004468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The prolonged use of percutaneous cholecystostomy tubes (PCTs) in patients with acute cholecystitis, deemed inoperable, is fraught with complications. Transpapillary cholecystoduodenal stenting (TCDS) is an alternative technique that restores the physiologic outflow of bile, avoiding the need for an external drain. However, the long-term safety and efficacy of this approach remain unclear. We sought to prospectively assess the safety and efficacy of this procedure, performed via percutaneous or endoscopic approach, in high-risk patients presenting with acute cholecystitis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This prospective study included consecutive patients with acute cholecystitis and long-lasting, prohibitive surgical risk, in whom TCDS was offered at two partnering tertiary care centers between August 1, 2018, and December 31, 2022. Patients with a need for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) underwent ERCP-guided TCDS. In patients without a need for ERCP, a temporary PCT was followed by fluoroscopic-guided TCDS 4 weeks to 6 weeks later. Interval cholecystectomy was performed in patients who became surgical candidates later. All patients were followed up until January 1, 2023.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Transpapillary cholecystoduodenal stenting was successful in 67 (percutaneous in 45/50; endoscopic in 22/23) of 73 patients (92%) attempted. Over a median follow-up period of 17 months (7, 26), 10 patients (15%) developed stent blockage or migration; all but two had their stent successfully replaced. Five patients (7%) developed mild, self-limited pancreatitis. Five (7%) patients underwent interval cholecystectomy at a median time of 7 months.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Transpapillary cholecystoduodenal stenting is a safe and promising definitive alternative to chronic PCT in high-risk patients with acute cholecystitis that eliminates the discomfort and complications of long-term external drainage.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>Therapeutic/Care Management; Level II.</p>","PeriodicalId":17453,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"319-326"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0000000000004468","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/11/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The prolonged use of percutaneous cholecystostomy tubes (PCTs) in patients with acute cholecystitis, deemed inoperable, is fraught with complications. Transpapillary cholecystoduodenal stenting (TCDS) is an alternative technique that restores the physiologic outflow of bile, avoiding the need for an external drain. However, the long-term safety and efficacy of this approach remain unclear. We sought to prospectively assess the safety and efficacy of this procedure, performed via percutaneous or endoscopic approach, in high-risk patients presenting with acute cholecystitis.

Methods: This prospective study included consecutive patients with acute cholecystitis and long-lasting, prohibitive surgical risk, in whom TCDS was offered at two partnering tertiary care centers between August 1, 2018, and December 31, 2022. Patients with a need for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) underwent ERCP-guided TCDS. In patients without a need for ERCP, a temporary PCT was followed by fluoroscopic-guided TCDS 4 weeks to 6 weeks later. Interval cholecystectomy was performed in patients who became surgical candidates later. All patients were followed up until January 1, 2023.

Results: Transpapillary cholecystoduodenal stenting was successful in 67 (percutaneous in 45/50; endoscopic in 22/23) of 73 patients (92%) attempted. Over a median follow-up period of 17 months (7, 26), 10 patients (15%) developed stent blockage or migration; all but two had their stent successfully replaced. Five patients (7%) developed mild, self-limited pancreatitis. Five (7%) patients underwent interval cholecystectomy at a median time of 7 months.

Conclusion: Transpapillary cholecystoduodenal stenting is a safe and promising definitive alternative to chronic PCT in high-risk patients with acute cholecystitis that eliminates the discomfort and complications of long-term external drainage.

Level of evidence: Therapeutic/Care Management; Level II.

急性胆囊炎经皮和内镜胆囊十二指肠支架置入术--高危患者可行的长期选择?
背景:被认为无法手术的急性胆囊炎患者长期使用经皮胆囊造口管(PCT)会导致并发症。经乳头胆囊十二指肠支架置入术(TCDS)是一种替代技术,可恢复胆汁的生理性流出,避免外引流。然而,这种方法的长期安全性和有效性仍不明确。我们试图通过经皮或内窥镜方法对急性胆囊炎高危患者进行前瞻性评估:这项前瞻性研究纳入了急性胆囊炎和长期存在手术风险的连续患者,2018 年 8 月 1 日至 2022 年 12 月 31 日期间,两家合作的三级医疗中心为这些患者提供了 TCDS。需要进行内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)的患者接受了ERCP引导下的TCDS。对于不需要ERCP的患者,则在4周至6周后进行临时PCT,然后在透视引导下进行TCDS。对后来成为手术候选者的患者进行了间歇性胆囊切除术。所有患者均接受随访至2023年1月1日:在 73 例尝试经胆囊十二指肠支架置入术的患者中,67 例(经皮置入 45/50;内镜置入 22/23)(92%)获得成功。在中位 17 个月的随访期间(7-26 个月),10 名患者(15%)出现支架阻塞或移位;除两名患者外,其余患者均成功更换了支架。五名患者(7%)出现了轻微的自限性胰腺炎。5名患者(7%)在中位7个月时接受了间歇性胆囊切除术:结论:对于急性胆囊炎高危患者来说,经胆囊十二指肠支架植入术是一种安全、有前途的慢性 PCT 的最终替代方案,可消除长期外引流带来的不适和并发症:预后和流行病学;V 级。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
11.80%
发文量
637
审稿时长
2.7 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery® is designed to provide the scientific basis to optimize care of the severely injured and critically ill surgical patient. Thus, the Journal has a high priority for basic and translation research to fulfill this objectives. Additionally, the Journal is enthusiastic to publish randomized prospective clinical studies to establish care predicated on a mechanistic foundation. Finally, the Journal is seeking systematic reviews, guidelines and algorithms that incorporate the best evidence available.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信