Mining and influencing factors analysis of sacituzumab govitecan adverse drug event based on FAERS database.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Liu Yang, Xueyu Duan, Shilin Wu, Xiaobo Liu, Hao Fan, Dingcai Zhang, Xuejiao Wu, Peng Hua
{"title":"Mining and influencing factors analysis of sacituzumab govitecan adverse drug event based on FAERS database.","authors":"Liu Yang, Xueyu Duan, Shilin Wu, Xiaobo Liu, Hao Fan, Dingcai Zhang, Xuejiao Wu, Peng Hua","doi":"10.1080/14740338.2024.2430305","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Utilizing the FAERS database, this study aims to analyze the ADE signals of sacituzumab govitecan to provide references for clinical safety.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>By searching the US FAERS database, we applied Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR) and Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR) methods to analyze ADE reports for sacituzumab govitecan from Q2 2020 to Q4 2023, covering 15 quarters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The total number of reports with sacituzumab govitecan as the first suspicion was 2854. A total of 139 signals involving 26 SOCs were obtained. The most reported were general disorders and administration site conditions (2,307 cases, 25.66%), followed by gastrointestinal disorders (1,125 cases, 12.52%), and investigations (810 cases, 9.01%). Frequent ADEs included sepsis and COVID-19 were not listed in the prescribing information. The signal strength analysis highlighted conditions like cholestasis and epilepsy not mentioned in the prescribing information. Furthermore, an analysis of influencing factors revealed differences in infections and infestations by gender and nationality (<i>p</i> < 0.05), and in gastrointestinal disorders and blood and lymphatic system disorders by gender, treatment duration, and nationality (<i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Common ADEs generally correspond with the prescribing information. Clinicians should be vigilant regarding unlisted ADEs about sacituzumab govitecan, and close monitoring of laboratory indicators ensure patient medication safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":12232,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","volume":" ","pages":"1-10"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14740338.2024.2430305","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Utilizing the FAERS database, this study aims to analyze the ADE signals of sacituzumab govitecan to provide references for clinical safety.

Methods: By searching the US FAERS database, we applied Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR) and Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR) methods to analyze ADE reports for sacituzumab govitecan from Q2 2020 to Q4 2023, covering 15 quarters.

Results: The total number of reports with sacituzumab govitecan as the first suspicion was 2854. A total of 139 signals involving 26 SOCs were obtained. The most reported were general disorders and administration site conditions (2,307 cases, 25.66%), followed by gastrointestinal disorders (1,125 cases, 12.52%), and investigations (810 cases, 9.01%). Frequent ADEs included sepsis and COVID-19 were not listed in the prescribing information. The signal strength analysis highlighted conditions like cholestasis and epilepsy not mentioned in the prescribing information. Furthermore, an analysis of influencing factors revealed differences in infections and infestations by gender and nationality (p < 0.05), and in gastrointestinal disorders and blood and lymphatic system disorders by gender, treatment duration, and nationality (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: Common ADEs generally correspond with the prescribing information. Clinicians should be vigilant regarding unlisted ADEs about sacituzumab govitecan, and close monitoring of laboratory indicators ensure patient medication safety.

基于FAERS数据库的sacituzumab govitecan药物不良事件挖掘及影响因素分析。
研究目的本研究旨在利用FAERS数据库,分析sacituzumab govitecan的ADE信号,为临床安全性提供参考:通过检索美国FAERS数据库,采用报告比值比(ROR)和比例报告比(PRR)方法,分析了2020年第二季度至2023年第四季度,共15个季度的sacituzumab govitecan的ADE报告,并从影响因素层面分析了优先系统器官分类(SOC):结果:以sacituzumab govitecan为首要疑点的报告总数为2854份。共获得 139 个信号,涉及 26 个器官分类。报告最多的是一般疾病和用药部位状况(2307 例,25.66%),其次是胃肠道疾病(1125 例,12.52%)和检查(810 例,9.01%)。常见的 ADE 包括疾病进展和中性粒细胞减少症,而败血症和 COVID-19 等情况则未列入处方信息。信号强度分析强调了胆碱能综合征和三阴性乳腺癌等病症,而胆汁淤积症和癫痫等病症则未在处方信息中提及。此外,对影响因素的分析表明,不同性别和国籍的人在感染和侵袭方面存在差异(p p 结论):常见的 ADE 和涉及的器官系统一般与处方信息相符。临床医生在使用sacituzumab govitecan时应警惕未列出的ADEs,并密切监测实验室指标,确保患者用药安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Drug Safety ranks #62 of 216 in the Pharmacology & Pharmacy category in the 2008 ISI Journal Citation Reports. Expert Opinion on Drug Safety (ISSN 1474-0338 [print], 1744-764X [electronic]) is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles on all aspects of drug safety and original papers on the clinical implications of drug treatment safety issues, providing expert opinion on the scope for future development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信