Physical activity and sedentary behaviour interventions for people living with both frailty and multiple long-term conditions and their informal carers: a scoping review and stakeholder consultation.

IF 6 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Hannah M L Young, Joseph Henson, Paddy C Dempsey, Scott A Willis, Roseanne E Billany, Ffion Curtis, Laura Gray, Sharlene Greenwood, Louisa Y Herring, Patrick Highton, Ryan J Kelsey, Selina Lock, Daniel S March, Krishna Patel, Jack Sargeant, Harini Sathanapally, Avan A Sayer, Martha Thomas, Noemi Vadaszy, Emma Watson, Tom Yates, Melanie Davies
{"title":"Physical activity and sedentary behaviour interventions for people living with both frailty and multiple long-term conditions and their informal carers: a scoping review and stakeholder consultation.","authors":"Hannah M L Young, Joseph Henson, Paddy C Dempsey, Scott A Willis, Roseanne E Billany, Ffion Curtis, Laura Gray, Sharlene Greenwood, Louisa Y Herring, Patrick Highton, Ryan J Kelsey, Selina Lock, Daniel S March, Krishna Patel, Jack Sargeant, Harini Sathanapally, Avan A Sayer, Martha Thomas, Noemi Vadaszy, Emma Watson, Tom Yates, Melanie Davies","doi":"10.1093/ageing/afae255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This scoping review mapped evidence on physical activity (including structured exercise) and sedentary behaviour interventions (interventions to reduce sedentary behaviour) in people living with both frailty and multiple long-term conditions (MLTCs) and their informal carers.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ten databases and grey literature were searched from 2000 to October 2023. Two reviewers screened studies and one extracted data. Results were shared with three stakeholder groups (n = 21) in a consultation phase.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After screening, 155 papers from 144 studies (1 ongoing) were retained. The majority were randomised controlled trials (86, 55%). Participants' mean age was 73 ± 12 years, and 73% were of White ethnicity. MLTC and frailty measurement varied widely. Most participants were pre-to-moderately frail. Physical health conditions predominated over mental health conditions.Interventions focused on structured exercise (83 studies, 60%) or combined interventions (55 studies, 39%). Two (1%) and one (0.7%) focused solely on habitual physical activity or sedentary behaviour. Adherence was 81% (interquartile range 62%-89%) with goal setting, monitoring and support important to adherence. Carers were only involved in 15 (11%) studies. Most interventions reported positive outcomes, primarily focusing on body functions and structures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A modest volume of evidence exists on multicomponent structured exercise interventions, with less focus on habitual physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Interventions report largely positive effects, but an updated systematic review is required. The field could be advanced by more rigorous characterisation of MLTCs, socioeconomic status and ethnicity, increased informal carer involvement and further evaluation of habitual physical activity and sedentary behaviour interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":7682,"journal":{"name":"Age and ageing","volume":"53 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11574057/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Age and ageing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afae255","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This scoping review mapped evidence on physical activity (including structured exercise) and sedentary behaviour interventions (interventions to reduce sedentary behaviour) in people living with both frailty and multiple long-term conditions (MLTCs) and their informal carers.

Methods: Ten databases and grey literature were searched from 2000 to October 2023. Two reviewers screened studies and one extracted data. Results were shared with three stakeholder groups (n = 21) in a consultation phase.

Results: After screening, 155 papers from 144 studies (1 ongoing) were retained. The majority were randomised controlled trials (86, 55%). Participants' mean age was 73 ± 12 years, and 73% were of White ethnicity. MLTC and frailty measurement varied widely. Most participants were pre-to-moderately frail. Physical health conditions predominated over mental health conditions.Interventions focused on structured exercise (83 studies, 60%) or combined interventions (55 studies, 39%). Two (1%) and one (0.7%) focused solely on habitual physical activity or sedentary behaviour. Adherence was 81% (interquartile range 62%-89%) with goal setting, monitoring and support important to adherence. Carers were only involved in 15 (11%) studies. Most interventions reported positive outcomes, primarily focusing on body functions and structures.

Conclusions: A modest volume of evidence exists on multicomponent structured exercise interventions, with less focus on habitual physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Interventions report largely positive effects, but an updated systematic review is required. The field could be advanced by more rigorous characterisation of MLTCs, socioeconomic status and ethnicity, increased informal carer involvement and further evaluation of habitual physical activity and sedentary behaviour interventions.

针对体弱多病者及其非正式照顾者的体育锻炼和久坐行为干预:范围界定审查和利益相关者咨询。
导言:本范围界定综述对体弱和患有多种长期病症(MLTCs)的患者及其非正式照顾者的体育锻炼(包括有组织的锻炼)和久坐行为干预(减少久坐行为的干预)的证据进行了分析:检索了 2000 年至 2023 年 10 月的 10 个数据库和灰色文献。两名审稿人筛选了研究,一名审稿人提取了数据。在咨询阶段,与三个利益相关者团体(n = 21)分享了结果:经过筛选,保留了来自 144 项研究(1 项正在进行中)的 155 篇论文。大部分为随机对照试验(86 篇,55%)。参与者的平均年龄为 73 ± 12 岁,73% 为白人。MLTC 和虚弱程度的测量结果差异很大。大多数参与者属于前期至中度虚弱。干预的重点是有组织的锻炼(83 项研究,60%)或综合干预(55 项研究,39%)。两项(1%)和一项(0.7%)仅针对习惯性体育锻炼或久坐行为。坚持运动的比例为 81%(四分位间范围为 62%-89%),目标设定、监测和支持对坚持运动非常重要。只有 15 项(11%)研究涉及到了照顾者。大多数干预措施都取得了积极成果,主要集中在身体功能和结构方面:关于多成分结构化运动干预的证据数量不多,但对习惯性体育活动和久坐行为的关注较少。干预措施在很大程度上产生了积极的效果,但还需要进行最新的系统回顾。通过更严格地描述多组分结构化运动疗法的特点、社会经济地位和种族、增加非正规护理者的参与以及进一步评估习惯性体力活动和久坐行为干预措施,可以推动该领域的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Age and ageing
Age and ageing 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
6.00%
发文量
796
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Age and Ageing is an international journal publishing refereed original articles and commissioned reviews on geriatric medicine and gerontology. Its range includes research on ageing and clinical, epidemiological, and psychological aspects of later life.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信