Unmet educational needs and expectations among tracheostomy recipients.

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q2 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Tyler J Gallagher, Oluwatobiloba Ayo-Ajibola, Michelle Koh, Catherine Julien, Kevin Herrera, Jonathan D West, Niels C Kokot
{"title":"Unmet educational needs and expectations among tracheostomy recipients.","authors":"Tyler J Gallagher, Oluwatobiloba Ayo-Ajibola, Michelle Koh, Catherine Julien, Kevin Herrera, Jonathan D West, Niels C Kokot","doi":"10.1016/j.amjoto.2024.104510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study seeks to better understand unmet educational needs and treatment expectations in individuals with a tracheostomy.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective, cross-sectional survey.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey was distributed to individuals who received a tracheostomy at a tertiary care center in the last five years as well as in Facebook support groups for tracheostomy and head and neck cancer patients. The survey focused on tracheostomy education, satisfaction with care, and gaps in treatment plan understanding. Primary outcome was rate of tracheostomy peri-operative experience being on-par with expectations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 83 respondents, only report of pre-operative speech (p = 0.024) and swallow (p = 0.019) discussions were associated with peri-operative experience being on-par with expectations. Respondents were more likely to report importance of counseling regarding psychological well-being (p < 0.001) and post-operative social integration/interaction (p < 0.001) than they were to report receiving focused counseling about these topics. Qualitative analysis demonstrated the most frequently missing components of understanding of treatment plans included post-operative care and the post-operative experience (n = 19, 40.4 % each). Reasons for treatment not meeting expectations included lack of communication/education (n = 15, 39.5 %) and experience being worse than expected (n = 8, 21.1 %). Individuals frequently wanted more details of the experience of living with a tracheostomy (n = 25, 42.6 %) and details about tracheostomy care (n = 10, 16.4 %).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates significant gaps in informational needs for individuals receiving a tracheostomy, emphasizing the importance of guideline-directed tracheostomy counseling. Specifically, more information is needed regarding expected post-surgical experience, tracheostomy care and maintenance, psychosocial wellbeing, and communication support.</p>","PeriodicalId":7591,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Otolaryngology","volume":" ","pages":"104510"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Otolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjoto.2024.104510","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study seeks to better understand unmet educational needs and treatment expectations in individuals with a tracheostomy.

Study design: Retrospective, cross-sectional survey.

Methods: A survey was distributed to individuals who received a tracheostomy at a tertiary care center in the last five years as well as in Facebook support groups for tracheostomy and head and neck cancer patients. The survey focused on tracheostomy education, satisfaction with care, and gaps in treatment plan understanding. Primary outcome was rate of tracheostomy peri-operative experience being on-par with expectations.

Results: Among 83 respondents, only report of pre-operative speech (p = 0.024) and swallow (p = 0.019) discussions were associated with peri-operative experience being on-par with expectations. Respondents were more likely to report importance of counseling regarding psychological well-being (p < 0.001) and post-operative social integration/interaction (p < 0.001) than they were to report receiving focused counseling about these topics. Qualitative analysis demonstrated the most frequently missing components of understanding of treatment plans included post-operative care and the post-operative experience (n = 19, 40.4 % each). Reasons for treatment not meeting expectations included lack of communication/education (n = 15, 39.5 %) and experience being worse than expected (n = 8, 21.1 %). Individuals frequently wanted more details of the experience of living with a tracheostomy (n = 25, 42.6 %) and details about tracheostomy care (n = 10, 16.4 %).

Conclusion: This study demonstrates significant gaps in informational needs for individuals receiving a tracheostomy, emphasizing the importance of guideline-directed tracheostomy counseling. Specifically, more information is needed regarding expected post-surgical experience, tracheostomy care and maintenance, psychosocial wellbeing, and communication support.

气管造口术受术者未得到满足的教育需求和期望。
研究目的本研究旨在更好地了解气管造口术患者未得到满足的教育需求和治疗期望:研究设计:回顾性横断面调查:向过去五年中在一家三级医疗中心接受过气管造口术的患者以及气管造口术和头颈部癌症患者 Facebook 支持小组的成员发放了一份调查问卷。调查的重点是气管切开术教育、护理满意度以及治疗计划理解方面的差距。主要结果是气管造口术围手术期体验与预期相符的比率:在 83 位受访者中,只有术前言语(p = 0.024)和吞咽(p = 0.019)讨论报告与围手术期体验与预期相符相关。受访者更倾向于报告有关心理健康咨询的重要性(p 结论:受访者更倾向于报告有关心理健康咨询的重要性(p 结论:受访者更倾向于报告有关心理健康咨询的重要性(p 结论):本研究表明,接受气管造口术的患者在信息需求方面存在很大差距,这强调了以指南为指导的气管造口术咨询的重要性。具体而言,需要更多有关预期手术后体验、气管造口护理和维护、社会心理健康和沟通支持的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Otolaryngology
American Journal of Otolaryngology 医学-耳鼻喉科学
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
378
审稿时长
41 days
期刊介绍: Be fully informed about developments in otology, neurotology, audiology, rhinology, allergy, laryngology, speech science, bronchoesophagology, facial plastic surgery, and head and neck surgery. Featured sections include original contributions, grand rounds, current reviews, case reports and socioeconomics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信