Incremental clinical value of intraplaque neovascularization in predicting recurrent ischemic stroke.

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Liuping Cui, Ran Liu, Fubo Zhou, Bing Tian, Ying Chen, Yingqi Xing
{"title":"Incremental clinical value of intraplaque neovascularization in predicting recurrent ischemic stroke.","authors":"Liuping Cui, Ran Liu, Fubo Zhou, Bing Tian, Ying Chen, Yingqi Xing","doi":"10.1002/acn3.52255","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Carotid intraplaque neovascularization (IPN) detected by contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is a risk factor for recurrent ischemic stroke. However, it is still unclear whether IPN can be used to accurately identify patients with recurrent ischemic stroke in clinical practice. Herein, we investigated the clinical predictive value of IPN for recurrent ischemic stroke in a real-world setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We enrolled 200 patients with ischemic stroke and atherosclerotic carotid stenosis who were followed up for 2 years. The endpoint was recurrent ischemic stroke. Cox regression and subgroup analyses were employed to assess whether treatment affected the relationship between IPN and recurrent ischemic stroke. The net classification index (NRI) and integrated discriminant improvement index (IDI) were used to validate the additional clinical value of IPN in identifying recurrent ischemic stroke.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the 2-year follow-up, 36 patients experienced recurrent ischemic stroke. Cox regression analyses showed that IPN (grade 2), hypoechoic plaque, high homocysteine levels, and smoking were independent risk factors for recurrent ischemic stroke. Additional IPN evaluation may increase the NRI (0.512; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.083-0.624) and IDI (0.151; 95% CI: 0.010-0.213) for identifying high-risk patients with recurrent ischemic stroke. In addition, in the subgroup undergoing revascularization, the proportion of IPN (grade 2) was significantly higher in patients with recurrent ischemic stroke than in patients with nonrecurrent ischemic stroke (p = 0.001).</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>In clinical settings, IPN, assessed by CEUS, may provide additional clinical value for predicting recurrent ischemic stroke, helping to identify patients with ischemic stroke who require close follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":126,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/acn3.52255","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Carotid intraplaque neovascularization (IPN) detected by contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) is a risk factor for recurrent ischemic stroke. However, it is still unclear whether IPN can be used to accurately identify patients with recurrent ischemic stroke in clinical practice. Herein, we investigated the clinical predictive value of IPN for recurrent ischemic stroke in a real-world setting.

Methods: We enrolled 200 patients with ischemic stroke and atherosclerotic carotid stenosis who were followed up for 2 years. The endpoint was recurrent ischemic stroke. Cox regression and subgroup analyses were employed to assess whether treatment affected the relationship between IPN and recurrent ischemic stroke. The net classification index (NRI) and integrated discriminant improvement index (IDI) were used to validate the additional clinical value of IPN in identifying recurrent ischemic stroke.

Results: During the 2-year follow-up, 36 patients experienced recurrent ischemic stroke. Cox regression analyses showed that IPN (grade 2), hypoechoic plaque, high homocysteine levels, and smoking were independent risk factors for recurrent ischemic stroke. Additional IPN evaluation may increase the NRI (0.512; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.083-0.624) and IDI (0.151; 95% CI: 0.010-0.213) for identifying high-risk patients with recurrent ischemic stroke. In addition, in the subgroup undergoing revascularization, the proportion of IPN (grade 2) was significantly higher in patients with recurrent ischemic stroke than in patients with nonrecurrent ischemic stroke (p = 0.001).

Interpretation: In clinical settings, IPN, assessed by CEUS, may provide additional clinical value for predicting recurrent ischemic stroke, helping to identify patients with ischemic stroke who require close follow-up.

斑块内新生血管在预测缺血性脑卒中复发方面的临床增量价值。
目的:造影剂增强超声(CEUS)检测到的颈动脉斑块内新生血管(IPN)是缺血性卒中复发的一个危险因素。然而,在临床实践中,IPN 能否用于准确识别复发性缺血性脑卒中患者仍不清楚。在此,我们研究了 IPN 在真实世界中对复发性缺血性卒中的临床预测价值:方法:我们招募了 200 名缺血性脑卒中和颈动脉粥样硬化性狭窄患者,对他们进行了为期 2 年的随访。终点是复发性缺血性中风。采用 Cox 回归和亚组分析评估治疗是否会影响 IPN 与复发性缺血性中风之间的关系。净分类指数(NRI)和综合判别改进指数(IDI)用于验证 IPN 在识别复发性缺血性卒中方面的额外临床价值:结果:在2年的随访期间,36名患者出现了复发性缺血性卒中。Cox回归分析显示,IPN(2级)、低回声斑块、高同型半胱氨酸水平和吸烟是导致复发性缺血性卒中的独立危险因素。额外的 IPN 评估可提高 NRI(0.512;95% 置信区间 [CI]:0.083-0.624)和 IDI(0.151;95% 置信区间:0.010-0.213),用于识别复发性缺血性卒中的高危患者。此外,在接受血管再通的亚组中,复发性缺血性卒中患者的 IPN(2 级)比例明显高于非复发性缺血性卒中患者(P = 0.001):在临床中,CEUS 评估的 IPN 可为预测缺血性卒中复发提供额外的临床价值,有助于识别需要密切随访的缺血性卒中患者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
1.90%
发文量
218
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology is a peer-reviewed journal for rapid dissemination of high-quality research related to all areas of neurology. The journal publishes original research and scholarly reviews focused on the mechanisms and treatments of diseases of the nervous system; high-impact topics in neurologic education; and other topics of interest to the clinical neuroscience community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信