Evidence summary on perioperative non-pharmacological prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in patients with pancreatic cancer

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Ni Yang , Yuan Xu , Haoran Shi , Jianhua Sun , Yufen Ma , Shuli Guo , Ying Liu , Ranxun An , Xinyi Zhou
{"title":"Evidence summary on perioperative non-pharmacological prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in patients with pancreatic cancer","authors":"Ni Yang ,&nbsp;Yuan Xu ,&nbsp;Haoran Shi ,&nbsp;Jianhua Sun ,&nbsp;Yufen Ma ,&nbsp;Shuli Guo ,&nbsp;Ying Liu ,&nbsp;Ranxun An ,&nbsp;Xinyi Zhou","doi":"10.1016/j.apjon.2024.100592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To summarize the best evidence related to perioperative non-pharmacologic prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in patients with pancreatic cancer, and improve the quality of clinical practice.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>According to the “6S” evidence pyramid model, we searched guideline networks, professional society websites, and comprehensive databases for clinical decisions, clinical guidelines, expert consensus, evidence summaries, and systematic reviews related to perioperative non-pharmacological prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in patients with pancreatic cancer. The literature quality assessment followed appropriate tools. If there were any conflicts about the conclusions drawn from different sources of evidence, this study followed the principle of high-quality evidence and the latest published authoritative literature priority. The “JBI Evidence Pre-grading and Evidence Recommendation Level System 2014” was adopted for the evidence lacking a grading system.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Nineteen studies were included, including 7 guidelines, 5 expert consensus, 2 clinical decisions, 3 evidence summaries, and 2 systematic reviews. Twenty-three pieces of best evidence were summarized in five aspects: risk assessment, mechanical prophylactic devices, initiation and duration of non-pharmacological prevention, implementation strategies, and health education.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The 23 pieces of evidence in five aspects we summarized provide scientific references for clinical caregivers to develop perioperative venous thromboembolism prophylaxis for pancreatic cancer patients. In addition, in order for evidence to be effectively used to improve the quality of clinical practice, clinical caregivers should consider patient preferences and explore barriers to the evidence translation and application.</div></div><div><h3>Systematic review registration</h3><div>This study has been registered on the Fudan University Centre for Evidence-based Nursing (Registation No. ES20233506).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8569,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Oncology Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2347562524002142","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To summarize the best evidence related to perioperative non-pharmacologic prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in patients with pancreatic cancer, and improve the quality of clinical practice.

Methods

According to the “6S” evidence pyramid model, we searched guideline networks, professional society websites, and comprehensive databases for clinical decisions, clinical guidelines, expert consensus, evidence summaries, and systematic reviews related to perioperative non-pharmacological prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism in patients with pancreatic cancer. The literature quality assessment followed appropriate tools. If there were any conflicts about the conclusions drawn from different sources of evidence, this study followed the principle of high-quality evidence and the latest published authoritative literature priority. The “JBI Evidence Pre-grading and Evidence Recommendation Level System 2014” was adopted for the evidence lacking a grading system.

Results

Nineteen studies were included, including 7 guidelines, 5 expert consensus, 2 clinical decisions, 3 evidence summaries, and 2 systematic reviews. Twenty-three pieces of best evidence were summarized in five aspects: risk assessment, mechanical prophylactic devices, initiation and duration of non-pharmacological prevention, implementation strategies, and health education.

Conclusions

The 23 pieces of evidence in five aspects we summarized provide scientific references for clinical caregivers to develop perioperative venous thromboembolism prophylaxis for pancreatic cancer patients. In addition, in order for evidence to be effectively used to improve the quality of clinical practice, clinical caregivers should consider patient preferences and explore barriers to the evidence translation and application.

Systematic review registration

This study has been registered on the Fudan University Centre for Evidence-based Nursing (Registation No. ES20233506).
胰腺癌患者围手术期静脉血栓栓塞的非药物预防证据摘要
方法根据 "6S "证据金字塔模型,我们检索了指南网络、专业学会网站和综合数据库中与胰腺癌患者围手术期静脉血栓栓塞非药物预防相关的临床决策、临床指南、专家共识、证据摘要和系统综述。文献质量评估采用了适当的工具。如果不同证据来源得出的结论存在冲突,本研究遵循高质量证据和最新发表的权威文献优先的原则。结果共纳入19项研究,包括7项指南、5项专家共识、2项临床决定、3项证据摘要和2项系统综述。从风险评估、机械预防装置、非药物预防的启动和持续时间、实施策略和健康教育五个方面总结了 23 项最佳证据。结论我们总结的五个方面的 23 项证据为临床护理人员制定胰腺癌患者围手术期静脉血栓栓塞预防措施提供了科学参考。系统综述注册本研究已在复旦大学循证护理研究中心注册(注册号:ES20233506)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
11.10%
发文量
136
审稿时长
31 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信