Short and long-term clinical results of a minimally invasive syringe adapter for catheter free instillation of intravesical treatments

Ria Pothoven , Judith A.M. Derks , Erik Arendsen , Dick A.W. Janssen
{"title":"Short and long-term clinical results of a minimally invasive syringe adapter for catheter free instillation of intravesical treatments","authors":"Ria Pothoven ,&nbsp;Judith A.M. Derks ,&nbsp;Erik Arendsen ,&nbsp;Dick A.W. Janssen","doi":"10.1016/j.cont.2024.101723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction:</h3><div>Intravesical treatment is currently dependent on catheterization which can cause urethral discomfort and risk of urinary tract infections in selected patient groups such as interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS), overactive bladder syndrome (OAB) and recurrent urinary tract infections (rUTI). This study describes real-life clinical experience of a minimally invasive syringe adapter (Ialuadapter®) for catheter-free instillation of intravesical treatment.</div></div><div><h3>Methods:</h3><div>A retrospective study from a single center was performed. Quantitative and qualitative data was obtained on the use of the syringe adapter (Ialuadapter®) in 61 patients with IC/BPS (n=48), rUTI (n=6) and mixed /other diagnoses (including OAB; n= 7) who were receiving intravesical therapy. The evaluation period was 6 months during 2018–2019. Reasons for trying the syringe adapter, reasons for continuing with it and occurrence of UTIs before and during the evaluation period were recorded. In addition, 3 year follow-up data were obtained to assess long-term usage of the syringe adapter.</div></div><div><h3>Results:</h3><div>Mean follow-up was 4 months. The use of the syringe adapter was successful in 75% and a positive experience in 74% with the latter continuing to use the syringe adapter. Long-term (&gt;3 yrs) adherence of 40% was observed. The patients reported less pain (41%) while 23% reported that it was easier to use compared to conventional catheters. Only 6 UTIs were observed in the follow-up period.</div></div><div><h3>Discussion and conclusions:</h3><div>This retrospective study shows that the Ialuadapter® is a good, safe alternative to conventional catheterization for intravesical treatment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72702,"journal":{"name":"Continence (Amsterdam, Netherlands)","volume":"13 ","pages":"Article 101723"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Continence (Amsterdam, Netherlands)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772973724009986","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction:

Intravesical treatment is currently dependent on catheterization which can cause urethral discomfort and risk of urinary tract infections in selected patient groups such as interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS), overactive bladder syndrome (OAB) and recurrent urinary tract infections (rUTI). This study describes real-life clinical experience of a minimally invasive syringe adapter (Ialuadapter®) for catheter-free instillation of intravesical treatment.

Methods:

A retrospective study from a single center was performed. Quantitative and qualitative data was obtained on the use of the syringe adapter (Ialuadapter®) in 61 patients with IC/BPS (n=48), rUTI (n=6) and mixed /other diagnoses (including OAB; n= 7) who were receiving intravesical therapy. The evaluation period was 6 months during 2018–2019. Reasons for trying the syringe adapter, reasons for continuing with it and occurrence of UTIs before and during the evaluation period were recorded. In addition, 3 year follow-up data were obtained to assess long-term usage of the syringe adapter.

Results:

Mean follow-up was 4 months. The use of the syringe adapter was successful in 75% and a positive experience in 74% with the latter continuing to use the syringe adapter. Long-term (>3 yrs) adherence of 40% was observed. The patients reported less pain (41%) while 23% reported that it was easier to use compared to conventional catheters. Only 6 UTIs were observed in the follow-up period.

Discussion and conclusions:

This retrospective study shows that the Ialuadapter® is a good, safe alternative to conventional catheterization for intravesical treatment.
用于无导管膀胱内治疗的微创注射器适配器的短期和长期临床效果
导言:膀胱内治疗目前依赖于导尿管插入术,这可能会引起尿道不适,并有可能导致特定患者群体的尿路感染,如间质性膀胱炎/膀胱疼痛综合征(IC/BPS)、膀胱过度活动综合征(OAB)和复发性尿路感染(rUTI)。本研究介绍了微创注射器适配器(Ialuadapter®)用于无导管膀胱内灌注治疗的实际临床经验。获得了61名接受膀胱内治疗的IC/BPS(48人)、rUTI(6人)和混合/其他诊断(包括OAB;7人)患者使用注射器适配器(Ialuadapter®)的定量和定性数据。评估期为 2018-2019 年的 6 个月。记录了试用注射器适配器的原因、继续使用的原因以及评估期之前和期间的尿毒症发生情况。此外,还获得了 3 年的随访数据,以评估注射器适配器的长期使用情况。75%的患者成功使用了注射器适配器,74%的患者体验良好,后者继续使用注射器适配器。长期(3 年)坚持使用的比例为 40%。患者表示疼痛较轻(41%),23%的患者表示与传统导管相比更容易使用。讨论与结论:这项回顾性研究表明,Ialuadapter® 是替代传统导尿管进行膀胱内治疗的一种良好、安全的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
60 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信