Economic effects of wild boar damage to crops in protected areas of Nepal

IF 3.5 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Yamuna Gharti Magar , Bindu Pant , Sandeep Regmi , Hem Bahadur Katuwal , Jerrold L. Belant , Hari Prasad Sharma
{"title":"Economic effects of wild boar damage to crops in protected areas of Nepal","authors":"Yamuna Gharti Magar ,&nbsp;Bindu Pant ,&nbsp;Sandeep Regmi ,&nbsp;Hem Bahadur Katuwal ,&nbsp;Jerrold L. Belant ,&nbsp;Hari Prasad Sharma","doi":"10.1016/j.gecco.2024.e03301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Human wild-boar conflict is one of the prominent issues in Nepal, especially in areas adjacent to protected areas. Wild boars cause substantial damage to the agricultural crops and affect the lives of rural farmers through economic loss. However, the extent of this loss varies across protected areas. Thus, this study aims to compare the economic loss due to crop damage by wild boar between two protected areas with different management regimes; Shuklaphanta National Park (ShNP) and Dhorpatan Hunting Reserve (DHR). We used a questionnaire survey and descriptive statistics to characterize and compare the pattern of human wild boar conflicts between ShNP and DHR. Altogether, the two protected areas experienced a crop damage of 87,035.78 kg with an estimated economic loss of 26,389 USD within a year in our study. The most damaged crop in the ShNP was paddy whereas that in DHR was potato. We recorded a higher crop damage and economic loss in ShNP than in DHR. However, the severity of conflict is higher in DHR with around 8 % of the total production damaged by wild boar. Although the government declared wild boar an agricultural menace in 2023 and permitted killing on private lands, local communities should also apply other mitigation measures to prevent wild boars from entering crop fields. Additionally, the potential introduction of trophy hunting in ShNP (already permitted in DHR), following comprehensive studies, could help reduce economic losses associated with human-wild boar conflicts. Such combined efforts could create a more sustainable approach to managing wild boar populations while safeguarding local agriculture and livelihoods.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54264,"journal":{"name":"Global Ecology and Conservation","volume":"56 ","pages":"Article e03301"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Ecology and Conservation","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2351989424005055","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Human wild-boar conflict is one of the prominent issues in Nepal, especially in areas adjacent to protected areas. Wild boars cause substantial damage to the agricultural crops and affect the lives of rural farmers through economic loss. However, the extent of this loss varies across protected areas. Thus, this study aims to compare the economic loss due to crop damage by wild boar between two protected areas with different management regimes; Shuklaphanta National Park (ShNP) and Dhorpatan Hunting Reserve (DHR). We used a questionnaire survey and descriptive statistics to characterize and compare the pattern of human wild boar conflicts between ShNP and DHR. Altogether, the two protected areas experienced a crop damage of 87,035.78 kg with an estimated economic loss of 26,389 USD within a year in our study. The most damaged crop in the ShNP was paddy whereas that in DHR was potato. We recorded a higher crop damage and economic loss in ShNP than in DHR. However, the severity of conflict is higher in DHR with around 8 % of the total production damaged by wild boar. Although the government declared wild boar an agricultural menace in 2023 and permitted killing on private lands, local communities should also apply other mitigation measures to prevent wild boars from entering crop fields. Additionally, the potential introduction of trophy hunting in ShNP (already permitted in DHR), following comprehensive studies, could help reduce economic losses associated with human-wild boar conflicts. Such combined efforts could create a more sustainable approach to managing wild boar populations while safeguarding local agriculture and livelihoods.
野猪对尼泊尔保护区农作物造成的经济影响
人类与野猪的冲突是尼泊尔的一个突出问题,尤其是在保护区附近地区。野猪对农作物造成严重破坏,并通过经济损失影响农村农民的生活。然而,在不同的保护区,这种损失的程度也不尽相同。因此,本研究旨在比较舒克拉潘塔国家公园(ShNP)和多尔帕坦狩猎保护区(DHR)这两个具有不同管理制度的保护区因野猪破坏农作物而造成的经济损失。我们通过问卷调查和描述性统计来描述和比较舒克拉潘塔国家公园和多尔帕坦狩猎保护区之间的人类野猪冲突模式。在我们的研究中,两个保护区在一年内共造成农作物损失 87,035.78 千克,经济损失约为 26,389 美元。在 ShNP,受损最严重的作物是水稻,而在 DHR,受损最严重的作物是马铃薯。我们在 ShNP 记录到的作物损害和经济损失均高于 DHR。然而,在 DHR,冲突的严重程度更高,约 8% 的总产量被野猪破坏。虽然政府在 2023 年宣布野猪为农业威胁,并允许在私人土地上捕杀野猪,但当地社区也应采取其他缓解措施,防止野猪进入庄稼地。此外,在进行全面研究后,可能在 ShNP 引入战利品狩猎(DHR 已允许),这将有助于减少人与野猪冲突造成的经济损失。通过这些综合努力,可以在保护当地农业和生计的同时,创造一种更可持续的野猪种群管理方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Ecology and Conservation
Global Ecology and Conservation Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
8.10
自引率
5.00%
发文量
346
审稿时长
83 days
期刊介绍: Global Ecology and Conservation is a peer-reviewed, open-access journal covering all sub-disciplines of ecological and conservation science: from theory to practice, from molecules to ecosystems, from regional to global. The fields covered include: organismal, population, community, and ecosystem ecology; physiological, evolutionary, and behavioral ecology; and conservation science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信