Overview of saponin-producing species of Quillajaceae from a global perspective

IF 1.4 4区 生物学 Q4 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Ageu da Silva Monteiro Freire , Kyvia Pontes Teixeira das Chagas , Fernanda Moura Fonseca Lucas , Jaçanan Eloisa de Freitas Milani , Pedro Henrique Gonzalez de Cademartori , Christopher Thomas Blum
{"title":"Overview of saponin-producing species of Quillajaceae from a global perspective","authors":"Ageu da Silva Monteiro Freire ,&nbsp;Kyvia Pontes Teixeira das Chagas ,&nbsp;Fernanda Moura Fonseca Lucas ,&nbsp;Jaçanan Eloisa de Freitas Milani ,&nbsp;Pedro Henrique Gonzalez de Cademartori ,&nbsp;Christopher Thomas Blum","doi":"10.1016/j.bse.2024.104919","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The search for knowledge about forest species to support their conservation and sustainable use is crucial given the anthropogenic threats faced. The <em>Quillaja</em> genus holds pharmacological and economic relevance but faces risks of extinction. Thus, this study analyzes global scientific studies on the two species of this genus, to identify key scientific advances and conservation gaps concerning <em>Quillaja saponaria</em> and <em>Quillaja lancifolia</em>. A bibliometric review was conducted covering all published research on the topic in the Scopus database until 2022. Only scientific articles focusing on the respective species were considered, resulting in 552 documents involving <em>Q. saponaria</em> and 26 for <em>Q. lancifolia</em>. The country with the highest number of publications on <em>Q. saponaria</em> is the United States, followed by Chile, where the species occurs. With regard to <em>Q. lancifolia</em>, Brazil leads with the highest number of publications, followed by Uruguay. Saponins are the most extensively studied compounds produced by both species, exhibiting various types with different constituents and applications. The bark of <em>Q. saponaria</em> (92%) and the leaves of <em>Q. lancifolia</em> (84%) have been studied the most. The field of health sciences comprises the largest number of publications on both species, which have applications as vaccine adjuvants. However, a gap was identified in the realm of ecological studies, considering the potential of these species for restoring degraded areas. Hence, there is a need to expand silvicultural and conservation research, particularly given the strong demand for saponin production. Additionally, efforts to diversify techniques for sustainable exploitation should be encouraged to ensure the conservation of these species.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8799,"journal":{"name":"Biochemical Systematics and Ecology","volume":"117 ","pages":"Article 104919"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biochemical Systematics and Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305197824001376","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The search for knowledge about forest species to support their conservation and sustainable use is crucial given the anthropogenic threats faced. The Quillaja genus holds pharmacological and economic relevance but faces risks of extinction. Thus, this study analyzes global scientific studies on the two species of this genus, to identify key scientific advances and conservation gaps concerning Quillaja saponaria and Quillaja lancifolia. A bibliometric review was conducted covering all published research on the topic in the Scopus database until 2022. Only scientific articles focusing on the respective species were considered, resulting in 552 documents involving Q. saponaria and 26 for Q. lancifolia. The country with the highest number of publications on Q. saponaria is the United States, followed by Chile, where the species occurs. With regard to Q. lancifolia, Brazil leads with the highest number of publications, followed by Uruguay. Saponins are the most extensively studied compounds produced by both species, exhibiting various types with different constituents and applications. The bark of Q. saponaria (92%) and the leaves of Q. lancifolia (84%) have been studied the most. The field of health sciences comprises the largest number of publications on both species, which have applications as vaccine adjuvants. However, a gap was identified in the realm of ecological studies, considering the potential of these species for restoring degraded areas. Hence, there is a need to expand silvicultural and conservation research, particularly given the strong demand for saponin production. Additionally, efforts to diversify techniques for sustainable exploitation should be encouraged to ensure the conservation of these species.

Abstract Image

从全球角度概述藜科植物中产皂素的物种
鉴于人类面临的威胁,寻找有关森林物种的知识以支持其保护和可持续利用至关重要。Quillaja属植物具有药用和经济价值,但也面临着灭绝的危险。因此,本研究分析了有关该属两个物种的全球科学研究,以确定有关 Quillaja saponaria 和 Quillaja lancifolia 的主要科学进展和保护差距。我们对 Scopus 数据库中截至 2022 年发表的所有相关研究进行了文献计量学审查。只考虑了关注各自物种的科学文章,结果发现涉及箭毒皂苷的文献有 552 篇,涉及青叶箭毒皂苷的文献有 26 篇。关于Q. saponaria的文献数量最多的国家是美国,其次是该物种分布地智利。关于 Q. lancifolia,发表论文数量最多的国家是巴西,其次是乌拉圭。皂苷是对这两种植物所产生的化合物研究得最多的物质,其种类繁多,成分和用途也各不相同。对皂荚树皮(92%)和皂荚叶(84%)的研究最多。健康科学领域关于这两个物种的出版物数量最多,它们都可用作疫苗佐剂。不过,考虑到这些物种在恢复退化地区方面的潜力,生态研究领域还存在空白。因此,有必要扩大造林和保护研究,特别是考虑到对皂素生产的强劲需求。此外,应鼓励努力使可持续开发技术多样化,以确保这些物种得到保护。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biochemical Systematics and Ecology
Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 生物-进化生物学
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
147
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: Biochemical Systematics and Ecology is devoted to the publication of original papers and reviews, both submitted and invited, in two subject areas: I) the application of biochemistry to problems relating to systematic biology of organisms (biochemical systematics); II) the role of biochemistry in interactions between organisms or between an organism and its environment (biochemical ecology). In the Biochemical Systematics subject area, comparative studies of the distribution of (secondary) metabolites within a wider taxon (e.g. genus or family) are welcome. Comparative studies, encompassing multiple accessions of each of the taxa within their distribution are particularly encouraged. Welcome are also studies combining classical chemosystematic studies (such as comparative HPLC-MS or GC-MS investigations) with (macro-) molecular phylogenetic studies. Studies that involve the comparative use of compounds to help differentiate among species such as adulterants or substitutes that illustrate the applied use of chemosystematics are welcome. In contrast, studies solely employing macromolecular phylogenetic techniques (gene sequences, RAPD studies etc.) will be considered out of scope. Discouraged are manuscripts that report known or new compounds from a single source taxon without addressing a systematic hypothesis. Also considered out of scope are studies using outdated and hard to reproduce macromolecular techniques such as RAPDs in combination with standard chemosystematic techniques such as GC-FID and GC-MS.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信